Intake & Exhaust Questions and info regarding various aftermatket exhaust systems for the G35 (Headers,Y-Pipes, and Cat-Back Systems)

TB spacer

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jun 8, 2009 | 05:38 PM
  #46  
redlude97's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (25)
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,911
Likes: 8
From: Seattle, WA
Originally Posted by OCG35
But an extended flange of a revup airbox does wonders
:bowr ofl:
Instead of misdirecting the thread like you keep accusing others of doing, can you please answer the question I posed above?
 
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2009 | 05:52 PM
  #47  
OCG35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (33)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 17,181
Likes: 154
From: OC - So Cal
Originally Posted by Jeff92se
Besides, I distinctly remember YOU not only asking but purchasing a revup 1/2 airbox.
Yep – even had it painted with the rest of my engine bay stuff… I plan to test the diff between Stillen airbox and OEM so I figured I might as well use the “wonder box” – even though I’ve stated many times I don’t expect to notice any gains.

Redlude, read the history – I have told the entire facts from beginning to end many, many times… I’m simply not going to reiterate all the detail yet again (its extremely long and involved)… I said that from the beginning of this thread – and of course the yahoos insist on tacking the thread OT – and yes, I’m going to correct the wrong.

Read the history – or simply install one yourself and post respectable opinions of the thing – instead of the nonsense that keeps getting posted in every single tbs thread.

OP – its too bad you couldn’t get your simple question simply answered… the “preachers” that want everyone to believe they are doing worldly duties for the community insist on keeping the entire thread OT.
 
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2009 | 05:58 PM
  #48  
Jeff92se's Avatar
Red Card Crew
iTrader: (24)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 37,810
Likes: 585
From: ɐʍ 'ǝlʇʇɐǝs
Premier Member

Wait, you just took ALL this time trashing two members but you don't have the time to clarify one of the most ON TOPIC questions poised to you?

Who's preaching (except for yourself)? I merely posted exactly what a well respected vendor has said (more than once) about this particular mod.

And BTW. The V-stack mod probably won't "gain" you anything. Expecially in terms of a dyno run. But if the dyno run can accurately read down to 2,000 and up, it "might" show something. Then again, I don't think anyone actually claimed it would do anything but what it's actually touted as doing. You should know this as you purchased it on the same premise.

But since you clipped the other 2/3 of my post, I'm guessing you won't have a reply to those more on topic related questions.
 
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2009 | 10:56 PM
  #49  
DaveB's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,573
Likes: 72
From: Kansas City
Originally Posted by OCG35
Yep – even had it painted with the rest of my engine bay stuff… I plan to test the diff between Stillen airbox and OEM so I figured I might as well use the “wonder box” – even though I’ve stated many times I don’t expect to notice any gains.

Redlude, read the history – I have told the entire facts from beginning to end many, many times… I’m simply not going to reiterate all the detail yet again (its extremely long and involved)… I said that from the beginning of this thread – and of course the yahoos insist on tacking the thread OT – and yes, I’m going to correct the wrong.

Read the history – or simply install one yourself and post respectable opinions of the thing – instead of the nonsense that keeps getting posted in every single tbs thread.

OP – its too bad you couldn’t get your simple question simply answered… the “preachers” that want everyone to believe they are doing worldly duties for the community insist on keeping the entire thread OT.
Is this guy for real Now this thread is just funny. Thanks for the laugh, OC.
 
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2009 | 10:57 PM
  #50  
xXHotelCrazyXx's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (21)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 8,664
Likes: 221
From: five oh two
You should have seen him try to tell me about cams I gave up on dude and lost all hope for him at that point!
 
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2009 | 03:06 AM
  #51  
redlude97's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (25)
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,911
Likes: 8
From: Seattle, WA
Originally Posted by OCG35
Yep – even had it painted with the rest of my engine bay stuff… I plan to test the diff between Stillen airbox and OEM so I figured I might as well use the “wonder box” – even though I’ve stated many times I don’t expect to notice any gains.

Redlude, read the history – I have told the entire facts from beginning to end many, many times… I’m simply not going to reiterate all the detail yet again (its extremely long and involved)… I said that from the beginning of this thread – and of course the yahoos insist on tacking the thread OT – and yes, I’m going to correct the wrong.

Read the history – or simply install one yourself and post respectable opinions of the thing – instead of the nonsense that keeps getting posted in every single tbs thread.

OP – its too bad you couldn’t get your simple question simply answered… the “preachers” that want everyone to believe they are doing worldly duties for the community insist on keeping the entire thread OT.
I just went back and read all of the relevant threads fromt the beginning, so let me get this straight. After lecturing us all on making claims about something we've never used before, your claims about this product are based on other people's dynos and opinions, since your own results weren't conclusive? You have not addressed why your car made the same hp after removing the spacer in any of the threads, and even admit that it is contradictory to Shawn Church's results that showed gains. Wow.
 
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2009 | 03:19 PM
  #52  
OCG35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (33)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 17,181
Likes: 154
From: OC - So Cal
Originally Posted by xXHotelCrazyXx
You should have seen him try to tell me about cams I gave up on dude and lost all hope for him at that point!
Really?... how about you post up a link to the threads we’ve discussed cams and headers in and show which one of us was full of crap…
 
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2009 | 03:46 PM
  #53  
DaveB's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,573
Likes: 72
From: Kansas City
Originally Posted by OCG35
Really?... how about you post up a link to the threads we’ve discussed cams and headers in and show which one of us was full of crap…
Really?.... how about you answer redlube97's questions.
 
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2009 | 04:02 PM
  #54  
xXHotelCrazyXx's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (21)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 8,664
Likes: 221
From: five oh two
Originally Posted by OCG35
Really?... how about you post up a link to the threads we’ve discussed cams and headers in and show which one of us was full of crap…
Thank you. We’re all refreshed and challenged by your unique point of view.

You were wrong then and you still wrong now. Correct me if Im not on the same page, but everybody seems to agree
 
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2009 | 04:10 PM
  #55  
OCG35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (33)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 17,181
Likes: 154
From: OC - So Cal
Originally Posted by xXHotelCrazyXx
Thank you. We’re all refreshed and challenged by your unique point of view.

You were wrong then and you still wrong now. Correct me if Im not on the same page, but everybody seems to agree
"everybody" 3 people in this thread that have never used the tbs and 2 people that have... the 2 that have currently use it. The 3 that don’t - hardly count as "everybody", and none of it is regarding cams...

then there is you - the one that dug himself deeper and deeper into fail regarding cams and headers... feel free to post up the thread to remind everyone how inept you were. The thread tells all - please post the link.
 
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2009 | 04:50 PM
  #56  
xXHotelCrazyXx's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (21)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 8,664
Likes: 221
From: five oh two
Originally Posted by OCG35
"everybody" 3 people in this thread that have never used the tbs and 2 people that have... the 2 that have currently use it. The 3 that don’t - hardly count as "everybody", and none of it is regarding cams...

then there is you - the one that dug himself deeper and deeper into fail regarding cams and headers... feel free to post up the thread to remind everyone how inept you were. The thread tells all - please post the link.
Your a moron. You made it clear in your talk about cams you don't know what the hell is going on when it comes to a reciprocating engine, and you've proven the same theory of yours here as well. Your still a moron. Now why don't you answer some of the questions that have been repeaditdly asked and you seem to keep avoiding. Whats wrong? You seem to be having a really hard time manning up.
 
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2009 | 05:02 PM
  #57  
OCG35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (33)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 17,181
Likes: 154
From: OC - So Cal
from post #11 - ALL THE WAY BACK ON PAGE 1!!!

Originally Posted by OCG35
I don’t know what you mean by "work"... if you are asking if it will fit - It depends... I know I couldn’t use a Samco silicone z-tube or a carbon fiber z-tube because neither have the flex of the accordion ends like the OEM... for what its worth, I did a sh!tlaod of searching for both of those intakes and bought BOTH! and ended up returning both in order to keep the TBS. Trust me, I would never had gone through that if the TBS doesn’t work.

Now, if you are asking if there are gains by using this with CAI - I don’t see why not... however, all the tests I have seen regarding CAI (long tube) vs short ram favor short ram anyway. And all the people I know using this TBS have short ram intake or sc. I don’t have long tube (and wouldn’t) so I can’t tell you for certain first hand. But I'm sure the peanut gallery with all their "theories" can tell you "for sure"

If you've read all the threads (as full of debate as they are) - you would have found that this tbs happens to work on the VQ as a fluke – it was not designed necessarily to work the way it does… it just happens that this design does work on the VQ... I'm not going into the details because it only ends up with yahoos chiming in and wasting time... but the same design has been used on other cars and does not show the same gains... the radius curve at the neck of the plenum is the difference... so for that reason it should not matter whether your induction tube is long or short.

The only thing to consider is how your intake is mounted... if it is fixed at any point (as in bolted stationary) and the install location cant be altered, then you probably wont be able to use it... you need about an inch of clearance to accommodate the width of the spacer – so you either need 1” of collapsible flex, or the ability to mount the intake with the filter and inch farther away.
it ended up EXACTLY the way I said it would. EVERYTHING about this tbs has been posted openly over and over and over again... I'm simply not going to rehash it again. I should have quit after post number 11.

Hotel, you foolish scrub - why are you afraid to post the link regarding cams and headers?... are you worried that everyone will see what a tard you actually are? Its real easy to come in a thread and start squawking - but you had you @ss handed to you in the threads about cams and headers and you know it. If I'm wrong, post up and prove how wrong I am... until then you are as much of a liar here as you were there (and you know I posted numerous quotes of yours to prove it).
 
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2009 | 05:07 PM
  #58  
Jeff92se's Avatar
Red Card Crew
iTrader: (24)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 37,810
Likes: 585
From: ɐʍ 'ǝlʇʇɐǝs
Premier Member

The only one wasting time is you Mike. Especially when you choose to ignore the most on topic of questions.

BTW. If you don't want to chime in, don't. Period. Don't imply something, take a few cheap shots and then complain when people come in and defend themselves.

So Redlude97 is a "yahoo" now too? Interesting.
 
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2009 | 05:18 PM
  #59  
xXHotelCrazyXx's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (21)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 8,664
Likes: 221
From: five oh two
OC, like i told you before, dont know what your trying to prove. I work on aircraft engines (thus which are far more sophisticated than a DOHC VQ35DE) Cams are a piece of cake. Like i told you before, i have nothing to prove to you, you have already shown everyone before and once again in here how your train of thought runs on a daily basis. I mean honestly, a throttle body spacer? You really think that its going to work? Tell me how will it carry the same centrifugal motion of air once it passes through the spacer and separates into each intake port when the valve opens? :bowroflmao: The twirling motion that happens after the spacer will be disrupted while the other valves open and the direction of airflow will change once it enters into each cylinder. If it was such a fabulous product, why the fawk didnt the engineers at NissanJP make them? I rest my case. Your still a fail.
 
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2009 | 05:19 PM
  #60  
xXHotelCrazyXx's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (21)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 8,664
Likes: 221
From: five oh two
BTW feel free to post the thread OC, im here drinking my Blue Moon with a smile on my face! Gotta love your style! Its pure comedy!
 
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:34 AM.