pop charger and z tube?
#1
#6
#7
Trending Topics
#10
#11
#12
#13
Your obviously a retard, do some searching about jwt and heat soak issues. I run the setup myself but I realize that in hot weather and/or in non-continuous motion I will lose out due to heat soak. Stop spreading your bull**** without doing some reading tard.
#14
Clown, thank you proving my point. IAT is what causes the power loss. If you provide the element adequate thermal protection from the heat coming from the engine you can elevate the initial lag in performance. If you have an 06 box....use it, but if not the pop charger is the next best option IMO.
Since you seem a little slow......here is a PDF for you to read:
http://cjbfire.com/Heatsoak.pdf
Since you seem a little slow......here is a PDF for you to read:
http://cjbfire.com/Heatsoak.pdf
#15
Clown, thank you proving my point. IAT is what causes the power loss. If you provide the element adequate thermal protection from the heat coming from the engine you can elevate the initial lag in performance. If you have an 06 box....use it, but if not the pop charger is the next best option IMO.
Since you seem a little slow......here is a PDF for you to read:
http://cjbfire.com/Heatsoak.pdf
Since you seem a little slow......here is a PDF for you to read:
http://cjbfire.com/Heatsoak.pdf
And show me dynos that show the jwt popcharger even with the shield makes more power than any of the stock boxes, or stock boxes with k&n filters. Nobody tries to deny the fact that the oem boxes are the best for performance, with the 06 ones being the top but not much better than the others. The power difference may not be that great but the jwt system definitely does not make more power than the stock boxes. Add in the intake of hot air (does phrasing it like that help you?) on hot days and in more idle conditions and there is a greater loss of power.
But go ahead and try to tell me the jwt makes more power, but please include dyno proof.