Injen CAI vs Fujita CAI

Subscribe
View Poll Results: Fujita CAI vs Injen CAI
Fujita CAI
3
33.33%
Injen CAI
6
66.67%
Voters: 9. You may not vote on this poll
Feb 15, 2011 | 01:54 AM
  #1  
So i have two guys that wants to sell me their intakes, they are pretty much the same price. I have googled for days and found only 1 comparison, but the conclusion was unclear.

The Injen CAI was made for the 350z, but the seller said it would fit in the g35 as well and it could be converted to a short ram.

The fujita came from another g35, so no worries about fitting it for this intake.

So guys, which one do you think i should get? (Im interested in both the sound and the performance, but the look of it under my hood is useless to me )
Reply 0
Feb 15, 2011 | 02:41 AM
  #2  
INJEN.
1. I have heard this thing in person and it is way louder than a fujita.
2. You have the option to convert between short and CAI with the INJEN.
3. The built quality is a lot better with the INJEN than the Fujita IMO.

I dont have an intake but a Z-tube and drop in K&N. But if i wanted i would get the INJEN.
Reply 0
Feb 15, 2011 | 05:01 PM
  #3  
INJEN all the way!!!! Fujita is gay!
Reply 0
Feb 16, 2011 | 12:04 AM
  #4  
So i ended up buying both just so i could try them both and see which one is better.

Currently trying out the Fujita since the majority picks the Injen, so when i switch to Injen i can just keep it like that

My friend that works at the shop looked at the 350z injen intake and said he needs to do an extension some where to install it properly.

With the Fujita atm, i def hear more growl than before.
Reply 0
Feb 16, 2011 | 11:30 AM
  #5  
sweet, let us know the difference!
Reply 0
Feb 17, 2011 | 05:25 AM
  #6  
To me, there were no difference. They were both short ram intakes, maybe thats why.
Car feels exactly the same with either intakes.
Reply 0
Feb 17, 2011 | 12:22 PM
  #7  
^any difference sound wise?
Reply 0
Subscribe