Has anyone tried this....
#1
Has anyone tried this....
Hey guys...has anyone tried to install both a 5/16" or 1/2" Plenum spacer and a Crawford Plenum at the same time? Is it even possible? Im looking for the most possible things i can do to the engine that are pretty easy installs. Aka: intake (Z-tube + stillen airbox), spacer, hypergrounding kit, plenum, test pipes (Oh yea...how much power are you supposed to get from test pipes?)...etc
Are there any other mods that you guys would recommend other than exhaust, turbo, or SC? I dont want to do either of those 3. Im in love with the sound of the stock exhaust...and its going to be loud enough once i do the intake and spacer. Any help would be appreciated...
Khal
Are there any other mods that you guys would recommend other than exhaust, turbo, or SC? I dont want to do either of those 3. Im in love with the sound of the stock exhaust...and its going to be loud enough once i do the intake and spacer. Any help would be appreciated...
Khal
#5
Now wait a minute guys,
I'm glad this was asked, b/c I was eventually going to ask the same exact question...
**The Spacer is there as the "Middle Man" to allow more AIR in from pushing the top plenum up, right...?
**The OEM Upper Plenum has a "tilted" front b/c it's the same used for the Z and the 350Z has the bar which they had to make the front more SQUISHED to allow for the bar, right....?
Well, if the Crawford Upper Plenum makes the front more open and the volume all around inside the Plenum more even, then WHY could you not use BOTH???
Esentially you should get better power from the spacer and even better power from the Crawford Plenum sitting on top of the Spacer........No?
Let's discuss.
I'm glad this was asked, b/c I was eventually going to ask the same exact question...
**The Spacer is there as the "Middle Man" to allow more AIR in from pushing the top plenum up, right...?
**The OEM Upper Plenum has a "tilted" front b/c it's the same used for the Z and the 350Z has the bar which they had to make the front more SQUISHED to allow for the bar, right....?
Well, if the Crawford Upper Plenum makes the front more open and the volume all around inside the Plenum more even, then WHY could you not use BOTH???
Esentially you should get better power from the spacer and even better power from the Crawford Plenum sitting on top of the Spacer........No?
Let's discuss.
#7
I doubt that stacking an aftermarket plenum on top of an aftermarket plenum spacer will yield any additional gains. I surmise this because, if it were true . . . Two things would have already happened . . . 1) The plenum spacers being offered would be much much thicker or 2) The plenums being offered would be much much taller.
Trending Topics
#10
Take a look at these two links, particularly the second:
http://www.motordyneengineering.com/dynos.asp
http://www.motordyneengineering.com/techinfo.asp
The gist of the two pages is that increasing the spacing has diminishing returns beyond 5/16" or 1/2". There's even a pretty significant performance difference between 5/16" and 1/2", as the smaller spacer adds more power throughout the entire rev range, while the 1/2" mostly adds power at the high end.
What you're suggesting seems feasible, but I seriously doubt that you'll see any gains. PM Hydrazine (Tony @ ME) and ask him directly.
http://www.motordyneengineering.com/dynos.asp
http://www.motordyneengineering.com/techinfo.asp
The gist of the two pages is that increasing the spacing has diminishing returns beyond 5/16" or 1/2". There's even a pretty significant performance difference between 5/16" and 1/2", as the smaller spacer adds more power throughout the entire rev range, while the 1/2" mostly adds power at the high end.
What you're suggesting seems feasible, but I seriously doubt that you'll see any gains. PM Hydrazine (Tony @ ME) and ask him directly.
#11
They were fixing a specific design flaw that only applied to two cylinders due to engine hood clearence issues. Once you fix that the cylinder flow is limited an equal amount........primarily by intake valve area and cam lift [curtain area].
The standard SAE flow bench uses 25" WC as a reference, yet they are referencing 0.75 psi x 28 = 21" WC ????
Would be nice to see [flow bench data] the various heads with plenum attach to prove the flow improvement.......instead of some variable dyno assertation.
The standard SAE flow bench uses 25" WC as a reference, yet they are referencing 0.75 psi x 28 = 21" WC ????
Would be nice to see [flow bench data] the various heads with plenum attach to prove the flow improvement.......instead of some variable dyno assertation.
#13
I doubt that stacking an aftermarket plenum on top of an aftermarket plenum spacer will yield any additional gains. I surmise this because, if it were true . . . Two things would have already happened . . . 1) The plenum spacers being offered would be much much thicker or 2) The plenums being offered would be much much taller.
I personally think that the Crawford is just getting the plenum back to where it should have been in the first place, since the G35 does NOT need the added room for the tie bar, like the 350Z, but with COST CUTTING measures, I see that they used the plenum for both sets of cars.
Now,,,with that being said, adding a plenum spacer to the mix *SHOULD* only get you more gains. We all agree with that. Now, the question really is...with a plenum spacer in place...do we need or not need the crawford (corrected version of the Z)??
I agree with the member that said too much air will HURT more than help.
SO.......
Maybe with the Plenum Spacer, even with the OEM *Squished* front, is giving plenty of added "Air Space".....? Maybe it's all our car needs..??
Any more opinions Guys....
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
youngdip631
V36 Interior, Exterior & Lighting
2
09-28-2015 03:55 AM
|| Vitty ||
Brakes & Suspension (DIY)
18
04-26-2009 11:07 AM