OFFICIAL: Aggressive Wheel fitment FLUSH/STRETCH sedan - Page 23 - G35Driver

Apr 7, 2010 | 02:48 PM

#331

Fabrikator

Registered User

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Dec 2007

Posts: 365

Likes: 6

From: Vancouver, BC

Quote:

Originally Posted by Johnnyone

Congrats.. i wish i could run those specs but a 245 35 on a 10.5 and running
-3.5 camber was a lil too much for me.

I think i can get some used 20x11 +15 HRE's locally but man that's just too aggressive for me on coils. If i was on bags and really stretched tire i think i could pull it off.

Im not gonna lie, Im a little nervous about the +20 LOL, but im not opposed to a fender pull. I was gonna get +24 in the rear originally, but at the time of ordering, something in me was like "FAK iT!... do +20" lol.. oh well.

Apr 7, 2010 | 02:48 PM

#332

G SEDAN

Registered User

iTrader: (94)

Joined: Jun 2006

Posts: 17,055

Likes: 19

From: Southern California

Quote:

Originally Posted by Johnnyone

And here is the result.

please please please tell me you are going to lower it

Apr 7, 2010 | 02:52 PM

#333

SN00P

CLUB MODERATOR

iTrader: (21)

Joined: Jan 2010

Posts: 8,028

Likes: 118

From: Florida G club

can we have some side shots on the car

Apr 7, 2010 | 04:59 PM

#334

gtrefever

Thread Starter

Registered User

iTrader: (6)

Joined: Apr 2008

Posts: 3,564

Likes: 66

From: san diego, ca

in all honestly you gonna atleast tuck some tire if your gonna have some poke. you cant claim to be aggressive just cause your offsets are low you still gonna dump your car.

Apr 7, 2010 | 05:04 PM

#335

Johnnyone

Registered User

iTrader: (16)

Joined: Sep 2008

Posts: 2,085

Likes: 12

From: 615

Thought about going lower but i would lose my poke and it wouldnt match the rear poke with the current spacers. Also i wanted to wait and see how much clearance i would have with my new FG nismo front. I already scrap a lot at the current height so kinda leaning towars the height im at but we shall see.

Side shots.

Name: SDC10431.jpg
Views: 454
Size: 136.8 KB

Name: SDC10406.jpg
Views: 448
Size: 144.2 KB

Apr 7, 2010 | 05:10 PM

#336

gtrefever

Thread Starter

Registered User

iTrader: (6)

Joined: Apr 2008

Posts: 3,564

Likes: 66

From: san diego, ca

this is how a 9+4 215/35 looked upfront with -3 camber

10-1 225/35 -4 camber with a pull

my car is stock now but trying to save up to come back with an even more aggressive fitment.

Apr 7, 2010 | 05:12 PM

#337

Johnnyone

Registered User

iTrader: (16)

Joined: Sep 2008

Posts: 2,085

Likes: 12

From: 615

Quote:

Originally Posted by gtrefever

in all honestly you gonna atleast tuck some tire if your gonna have some poke. you cant claim to be aggressive just cause your offsets are low you still gonna dump your car.

I claimed to be semi aggressive,

I can only think of a handfull of a sedans that are running more aggressive setup than me..

What classifies as dumped? I think this is pretty low...

Name: SDC10391-1.jpg
Views: 453
Size: 72.0 KB

Apr 7, 2010 | 05:14 PM

#338

gtrefever

Thread Starter

Registered User

iTrader: (6)

Joined: Apr 2008

Posts: 3,564

Likes: 66

From: san diego, ca

low.

Apr 7, 2010 | 05:16 PM

#339

gtrefever

Thread Starter

Registered User

iTrader: (6)

Joined: Apr 2008

Posts: 3,564

Likes: 66

From: san diego, ca

it just doesnt looks right when you have so much tire sticking out and not tucking some of it. like my first pic i have tire tucked rim poked

Apr 7, 2010 | 05:18 PM

#340

eurodre

Registered User

iTrader: (11)

Joined: Oct 2007

Posts: 15,140

Likes: 535

From: Socal 818, CA

yah gtrefever was the lowest sedan

no one can compete

Apr 7, 2010 | 05:23 PM

#341

gtrefever

Thread Starter

Registered User

iTrader: (6)

Joined: Apr 2008

Posts: 3,564

Likes: 66

From: san diego, ca

thanks dre. ima make your proud when i come back hopefully by the next gtg in long beach hehe

Apr 7, 2010 | 05:25 PM

#342

eurodre

Registered User

iTrader: (11)

Joined: Oct 2007

Posts: 15,140

Likes: 535

From: Socal 818, CA

you mean by hellaflush 5 and/or the huntington beach g35 gtg in the summer right?

Apr 7, 2010 | 05:33 PM

#343

ShanesG

Former G35driver Vendor

iTrader: (84)

Joined: Sep 2007

Posts: 23,550

Likes: 335

From: Pasadena

You better bro!

Apr 7, 2010 | 05:36 PM

#344

Johnnyone

Registered User

iTrader: (16)

Joined: Sep 2008

Posts: 2,085

Likes: 12

From: 615

Quote:

Originally Posted by gtrefever

it just doesnt looks right when you have so much tire sticking out and not tucking some of it. like my first pic i have tire tucked rim poked

I agree it that it doesnt look the best with the poke and not tucking the some of the tire. As stated i was gonna see how much clearance i had with the new front and adjust from there.

I love that pic you posted and would love to be that low but i plan on driving about 50k miles this year.

Apr 7, 2010 | 05:43 PM

#345

SN00P

CLUB MODERATOR

iTrader: (21)

Joined: Jan 2010

Posts: 8,028

Likes: 118

From: Florida G club

Quote:

Originally Posted by gtrefever

this is how a 9+4 215/35 looked upfront with -3 camber

10-1 225/35 -4 camber with a pull

my car is stock now but trying to save up to come back with an even more aggressive fitment.

clean G ... thats how i want mine but not that crazy for now i want a mild aggressive look till i save up some more cash ... im going in the morning to get my fenders done and lowering it saturday ill deff post up some pics