OFFICIAL: Aggressive Wheel fitment FLUSH/STRETCH sedan

Subscribe
Apr 7, 2010 | 02:48 PM
  #331  
Quote: Congrats.. i wish i could run those specs but a 245 35 on a 10.5 and running
-3.5 camber was a lil too much for me.

I think i can get some used 20x11 +15 HRE's locally but man that's just too aggressive for me on coils. If i was on bags and really stretched tire i think i could pull it off.
Im not gonna lie, Im a little nervous about the +20 LOL, but im not opposed to a fender pull. I was gonna get +24 in the rear originally, but at the time of ordering, something in me was like "FAK iT!... do +20" lol.. oh well.
Reply 0
Apr 7, 2010 | 02:48 PM
  #332  
Quote:
And here is the result.
please please please tell me you are going to lower it
Reply 0
Apr 7, 2010 | 02:52 PM
  #333  
can we have some side shots on the car
Reply 0
Apr 7, 2010 | 04:59 PM
  #334  
in all honestly you gonna atleast tuck some tire if your gonna have some poke. you cant claim to be aggressive just cause your offsets are low you still gonna dump your car.
Reply 0
Apr 7, 2010 | 05:04 PM
  #335  
Thought about going lower but i would lose my poke and it wouldnt match the rear poke with the current spacers. Also i wanted to wait and see how much clearance i would have with my new FG nismo front. I already scrap a lot at the current height so kinda leaning towars the height im at but we shall see.

Side shots.

Name:  SDC10431.jpg
Views: 454
Size:  136.8 KB

Name:  SDC10406.jpg
Views: 448
Size:  144.2 KB


Reply 0
Apr 7, 2010 | 05:10 PM
  #336  
this is how a 9+4 215/35 looked upfront with -3 camber


10-1 225/35 -4 camber with a pull


my car is stock now but trying to save up to come back with an even more aggressive fitment.
Reply 0
Apr 7, 2010 | 05:12 PM
  #337  
Quote: in all honestly you gonna atleast tuck some tire if your gonna have some poke. you cant claim to be aggressive just cause your offsets are low you still gonna dump your car.
I claimed to be semi aggressive, I can only think of a handfull of a sedans that are running more aggressive setup than me..

What classifies as dumped? I think this is pretty low...
Name:  SDC10391-1.jpg
Views: 453
Size:  72.0 KB


Reply 0
Apr 7, 2010 | 05:14 PM
  #338  
low.
Reply 0
Apr 7, 2010 | 05:16 PM
  #339  
it just doesnt looks right when you have so much tire sticking out and not tucking some of it. like my first pic i have tire tucked rim poked
Reply 0
Apr 7, 2010 | 05:18 PM
  #340  
yah gtrefever was the lowest sedan

no one can compete
Reply 0
Apr 7, 2010 | 05:23 PM
  #341  
thanks dre. ima make your proud when i come back hopefully by the next gtg in long beach hehe
Reply 0
Apr 7, 2010 | 05:25 PM
  #342  
you mean by hellaflush 5 and/or the huntington beach g35 gtg in the summer right?
Reply 0
Apr 7, 2010 | 05:33 PM
  #343  
You better bro!
Reply 0
Apr 7, 2010 | 05:36 PM
  #344  
Quote: it just doesnt looks right when you have so much tire sticking out and not tucking some of it. like my first pic i have tire tucked rim poked
I agree it that it doesnt look the best with the poke and not tucking the some of the tire. As stated i was gonna see how much clearance i had with the new front and adjust from there.

I love that pic you posted and would love to be that low but i plan on driving about 50k miles this year.
Reply 0
Apr 7, 2010 | 05:43 PM
  #345  
Quote: this is how a 9+4 215/35 looked upfront with -3 camber


10-1 225/35 -4 camber with a pull


my car is stock now but trying to save up to come back with an even more aggressive fitment.

clean G ... thats how i want mine but not that crazy for now i want a mild aggressive look till i save up some more cash ... im going in the morning to get my fenders done and lowering it saturday ill deff post up some pics
Reply 0