Northern California San Francisco, Oakland, Sacramento, San Jose, Pleasanton, etc.

Osiris Install

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jan 18, 2008 | 06:27 PM
  #16  
Kris79's Avatar
battle froggy
iTrader: (56)
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 11,991
Likes: 4
yeah over lean = bad. but anyways whats the point of sobering up when ur gonig to get chit faced again?
 
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2008 | 06:50 PM
  #17  
dofu's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 10,822
Likes: 242
From: Silicon Valley
Originally Posted by kris79
yeah over lean = bad. but anyways whats the point of sobering up when ur gonig to get chit faced again?
Hell no... I don't drink anymore... but I will be at dinner!
 
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2008 | 07:00 PM
  #18  
Kris79's Avatar
battle froggy
iTrader: (56)
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 11,991
Likes: 4
when u decide not to drink anymore 4 mins ago?
 
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2008 | 07:11 PM
  #19  
ja3n3ss's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
From: bay area/sacto
overlean is a killer, rasing the rpm cutoff is def where the gains are comming from.
 
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2008 | 07:13 PM
  #20  
Klubbheads's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 17,039
Likes: 14
From: LA, North Holly
^rasing the rev limiter has no benefit on our motors, unless u have aftermarket cams.
 
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2008 | 07:20 PM
  #21  
Driver Elite's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 327
Likes: 2
From: Bay Area
Dude, Kris, the name is worth 10hp alone to the wheels. The extra 10 is tuning the car to spec.
 
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2008 | 07:25 PM
  #22  
ja3n3ss's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
From: bay area/sacto
Originally Posted by Klubbheads
^rasing the rev limiter has no benefit on our motors, unless u have aftermarket cams.
higher rev=staying boosted longer... its not just reliant on a/m cams. the higher you go up the more the motor pushes... =T
 
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2008 | 10:35 AM
  #23  
Kris79's Avatar
battle froggy
iTrader: (56)
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 11,991
Likes: 4
but in dons case he has no boost
 
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2008 | 11:04 AM
  #24  
ja3n3ss's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
From: bay area/sacto
Originally Posted by kris79
but in dons case he has no boost
not yet right... i thought he was seriously thinkin of pickin up tu's
 
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2008 | 04:12 PM
  #25  
koolaid80's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
Baseline test and install today, not too bad. Put down 198 rwhp & 196 tq on the base Osiris map.

Mustang 4wd Dyno, ambient temp: ~55, 91 octane.

Turns out my 2006 ECU is different than most g35 ECUs, so I'm going back to EIP next Saturday for a better map and hopefully more power.
 
Attached Thumbnails Osiris Install-dyno.jpg  

Last edited by koolaid80; Jan 19, 2008 at 04:24 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2008 | 05:10 PM
  #26  
sfgr415's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,219
Likes: 3
From: San Francisco
I though G35's were putting out around 235 rwhp.
 
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2008 | 05:27 PM
  #27  
dofu's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 10,822
Likes: 242
From: Silicon Valley
Not on this dyno... correctly calibrated AWD Mustang dynos have been known to read really low, this one reads a bit lower for some reason. But that is a good thing for tuning.

BTW, I don't think I raised the rev limiter... if I did, it was only a few thousand RPMs.

Koolaid, by the looks of your numbers, I'm guessing you don't have a revup? That looks like just a baseline and flash, no tune yet... I think that's why they want you back next Sat.
 
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2008 | 06:02 PM
  #28  
koolaid80's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
I do not have a rev-up engine, it's a 5AT Sedan. There's definitely no tune yet; Paul had to grab all the data off the Cipher datalogger and send it to Uprev so they can make a map for my car. Hopefully after the tune I'll be near 220, but we'll see. That increase in torque is definitely noticeable on the low end.
 
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2008 | 09:24 PM
  #29  
Kris79's Avatar
battle froggy
iTrader: (56)
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 11,991
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by dofu
Not on this dyno... correctly calibrated AWD Mustang dynos have been known to read really low, this one reads a bit lower for some reason. But that is a good thing for tuning.

BTW, I don't think I raised the rev limiter... if I did, it was only a few thousand RPMs.

Koolaid, by the looks of your numbers, I'm guessing you don't have a revup? That looks like just a baseline and flash, no tune yet... I think that's why they want you back next Sat.

wow only and a few thousand rpm shouldnt be int eh same sentence lol
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2008 | 03:55 AM
  #30  
koolaid80's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
I assumed the meant "a few hundred"

Also forgot to mention above that Paul didn't charge me the full amount, despite doing the dyno runs and Osiris install (only charged half, so $350).
 

Last edited by koolaid80; Jan 20, 2008 at 02:32 PM.
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:36 PM.