Got pulled over today.
#46
08-21-2008, 05:59 PM
Avoiding potholes
Originally Posted by urban
Well it was bound to happen sometime, going through Sonoma town at the speed limit and I see a motorbike cop looking at me, next thing I know he starts to follow me and then pulls me over, he said it was illegal to have overlays on my back lights and asked me to remove them.
I thought they were legal as long as you could see the red lights when you brake but he said no and I was like ok, I got a fix it ticket which is a $10 fine and was told to enjoy the rest of my day.
Oh well they had to pick on me for something I suppose.
I thought they were legal as long as you could see the red lights when you brake but he said no and I was like ok, I got a fix it ticket which is a $10 fine and was told to enjoy the rest of my day.
Oh well they had to pick on me for something I suppose.
I hope this resolves quickly!
pssst....Rev'd at any old ladies lately?
#47
08-21-2008, 07:33 PM
Registered User
I would say you got off easy. I usually use 26101 VC. This section is NOT correctable. It is not a $10 fix it ticket. You still have to return the taillamps to original, and pay the fine, which last I heard was over $100.
26101. No person shall sell or offer for sale for use upon or as
part of the equipment of a vehicle, nor shall any person use upon a
vehicle, any device that is intended to modify the original design or
performance of any lighting equipment, safety glazing material, or
other device, unless the modifying device meets the provisions of
Section 26104. This section does not apply to a taillamp or stop
lamp in use on or prior to December 1, 1935, or to lamps installed on
authorized emergency vehicles.
26101. No person shall sell or offer for sale for use upon or as
part of the equipment of a vehicle, nor shall any person use upon a
vehicle, any device that is intended to modify the original design or
performance of any lighting equipment, safety glazing material, or
other device, unless the modifying device meets the provisions of
Section 26104. This section does not apply to a taillamp or stop
lamp in use on or prior to December 1, 1935, or to lamps installed on
authorized emergency vehicles.
#48
08-21-2008, 07:40 PM
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by g35 chippie
I would say you got off easy. I usually use 26101 VC. This section is NOT correctable. It is not a $10 fix it ticket. You still have to return the taillamps to original, and pay the fine, which last I heard was over $100.
26101. No person shall sell or offer for sale for use upon or as
part of the equipment of a vehicle, nor shall any person use upon a
vehicle, any device that is intended to modify the original design or
performance of any lighting equipment, safety glazing material, or
other device, unless the modifying device meets the provisions of
Section 26104. This section does not apply to a taillamp or stop
lamp in use on or prior to December 1, 1935, or to lamps installed on
authorized emergency vehicles.
26101. No person shall sell or offer for sale for use upon or as
part of the equipment of a vehicle, nor shall any person use upon a
vehicle, any device that is intended to modify the original design or
performance of any lighting equipment, safety glazing material, or
other device, unless the modifying device meets the provisions of
Section 26104. This section does not apply to a taillamp or stop
lamp in use on or prior to December 1, 1935, or to lamps installed on
authorized emergency vehicles.
lets say you had a friend that was also chp.... would he pull over people just for smoked tails?
#49
08-21-2008, 07:50 PM
Registered User
#50
08-21-2008, 08:01 PM
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#51
08-21-2008, 08:06 PM
Thanks Grace for stepping in and nope no revving at any old ladies lately, just young kids 
g35 chippie- I understand what you may have given but I think every officer uses their own discretion in these situations and I suppose as I was polite enough to listen and acknowledge his input he let me off with this. I have already taken most of the film off so yes it will be a $10 ticket.
g35 chippie- I understand what you may have given but I think every officer uses their own discretion in these situations and I suppose as I was polite enough to listen and acknowledge his input he let me off with this. I have already taken most of the film off so yes it will be a $10 ticket.
#52
08-21-2008, 08:29 PM
Registered User
Originally Posted by matthimself
i was trying to ask would you pull a car over for just smoked tails....
i didnt want to put you on the spot so i was using the whole... i got a friend thing when the friend was really you
#53
08-22-2008, 10:38 AM
made me remember the old forum when they talk shizt about cops
http://www.ubersite.com/m/59960
http://www.ubersite.com/m/59960
Last edited by azng45; 08-22-2008 at 01:00 PM.
#54
08-22-2008, 12:16 PM
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: PNW in Washington
Posts: 3,942
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
7 Posts
6MT Coupe
Chippie,
I know it's still an alteration to tail lights, but all parts of tail lights that illuminate aren't covered. So would these be considered more-or-less legal?
Understand if you can't stick your neck out and answer if borderline on code you posted, but I'd think those would be okay or more-so within legal guidelines.
I know it's still an alteration to tail lights, but all parts of tail lights that illuminate aren't covered. So would these be considered more-or-less legal?
Understand if you can't stick your neck out and answer if borderline on code you posted, but I'd think those would be okay or more-so within legal guidelines.
#56
08-22-2008, 01:01 PM
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Rockville, MD
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#59
08-22-2008, 03:21 PM
Originally Posted by dieselaznrock
I hope they know many cars no longer have red in the rear, ok... I dont know about many, but for sure the lexus' don't have any red int he back of their rx's
#60
08-24-2008, 10:34 PM
Registered User
Originally Posted by V35 Skyline GT
Chippie,
I know it's still an alteration to tail lights, but all parts of tail lights that illuminate aren't covered. So would these be considered more-or-less legal?
Understand if you can't stick your neck out and answer if borderline on code you posted, but I'd think those would be okay or more-so within legal guidelines.
I know it's still an alteration to tail lights, but all parts of tail lights that illuminate aren't covered. So would these be considered more-or-less legal?
Understand if you can't stick your neck out and answer if borderline on code you posted, but I'd think those would be okay or more-so within legal guidelines.
The section I posted says, "nor shall any person use upon a vehicle, any device that is intended to modify the original design OR performance of any lighting equipment" You could ask the officer his training and experience in court as to what is the orginal design of a G35 taillamp design I guess. Careful though, he/she might just know.