DC Sports Header & Fujitsubo Exhaust, Y-Pipe Install
Originally Posted by roneski
Glad to hear that you're happy with it. I need to look at getting some headers next.
Your're posts on the fuji contributed to my decision. Thank You! Get the headers! They make a huge difference. The engine is much smoother as your're shifting through the gears under hard acceleration. It changes the whole feel of the car.
I'm also interested in getting a header. but which one should I get? the price range varies alot. crawford is $1000 and DC header i think is only $500. why is the price different alot?
by the way, which one is better, the ceramic one or the steinlessteel?
by the way, which one is better, the ceramic one or the steinlessteel?
Originally Posted by Vic
I'm also interested in getting a header. but which one should I get? the price range varies alot. crawford is $1000 and DC header i think is only $500. why is the price different alot?
by the way, which one is better, the ceramic one or the steinlessteel?
by the way, which one is better, the ceramic one or the steinlessteel?
It's funny everyone says headers help out a lot because months back SCC magazine tested three 350Zs, one was stock, one had a CAI and after y-pipe exhaust, and the other had the CAI, exhaust including NISMO headers, and NISMO cams. When it came down to it, the dynos showed very little increase in power and the fully modded 350Z was only fractionally quicker than the stock 350Z. I have yet to see a before and after dyno of any G with headers.
http://www.my350z.com/forum/showthre...mo+header+dyno
"Nismo header independent dyno...u will be surprised"
daytona350z
Daytona Blue Comin Thru!!
huntington beach.orange county
Report post | IP: Logged
hey guys, i was just able to dyno my headers. my results were very good.
run 002-my base was 237.7hp and 230.9tq
run 3(1) was 249.2hp and 246tq
run 4(2) was negated cuz it was a mistake of 4th gear..still, 246.6 and 243.4tq though
run 5(3) was 249.3 and 249.4 tq.
peak gain of 11.6hp and 18.5lbs of tq
edit: conditions were about the same, being in favor of the baseline dyno... thursday was about 66* and stock dyno was 62* and on the first run, the fan turned off midway through the pull.
would post a bigger pic to see more clear, but had to resize it for forum purposes..would need a host to load larger file
btw..look at the fat torque gain all throughout the rpm band, especially at 4k

http://www.ssheaders.com/header.htm
http://www.burnsstainless.com/TechAr...ry/theory.html
"Nismo header independent dyno...u will be surprised"
daytona350z
Daytona Blue Comin Thru!!
huntington beach.orange county
Report post | IP: Logged
hey guys, i was just able to dyno my headers. my results were very good.
run 002-my base was 237.7hp and 230.9tq
run 3(1) was 249.2hp and 246tq
run 4(2) was negated cuz it was a mistake of 4th gear..still, 246.6 and 243.4tq though
run 5(3) was 249.3 and 249.4 tq.
peak gain of 11.6hp and 18.5lbs of tq
edit: conditions were about the same, being in favor of the baseline dyno... thursday was about 66* and stock dyno was 62* and on the first run, the fan turned off midway through the pull.
would post a bigger pic to see more clear, but had to resize it for forum purposes..would need a host to load larger file
btw..look at the fat torque gain all throughout the rpm band, especially at 4k

http://www.ssheaders.com/header.htm
http://www.burnsstainless.com/TechAr...ry/theory.html
Last edited by Gsedan35; Feb 24, 2005 at 05:44 PM.
Gsedan35-
Good post. Shortly after I posted, I searched my350Z.com and saw the same thing. What's sad is that seems to be the ONLY legitiment header dyno on that whole site.
In the May 04 issue of Sport Compact car, they tested a stock 350Z Track, an S-Tune 350Z (Nismo catback), and then the R-Tune 350Z (Nismo headers, Nismo cams, Nismo CAI, Nismo catback, Nismo clutch, Nismo lightened flywheel).
Track
239whp/237wtq 14.2@98.5mph
S-Tune
243whp/238wtq 14.1@98.4mph
R-Tune
249whp/242wtq <----oddly close to the dyno graph you posted above. They're almost exact. 14.1@99.3mph
All cars ran 18" rims.
Good post. Shortly after I posted, I searched my350Z.com and saw the same thing. What's sad is that seems to be the ONLY legitiment header dyno on that whole site.
In the May 04 issue of Sport Compact car, they tested a stock 350Z Track, an S-Tune 350Z (Nismo catback), and then the R-Tune 350Z (Nismo headers, Nismo cams, Nismo CAI, Nismo catback, Nismo clutch, Nismo lightened flywheel).
Track
239whp/237wtq 14.2@98.5mph
S-Tune
243whp/238wtq 14.1@98.4mph
R-Tune
249whp/242wtq <----oddly close to the dyno graph you posted above. They're almost exact. 14.1@99.3mph
All cars ran 18" rims.
Originally Posted by 1Z TWO Z
Those Dyno Plot lines match the lines on my grinning mug while I'm driving my header equipted G 

Originally Posted by DaveB
Gsedan35-
Good post. Shortly after I posted, I searched my350Z.com and saw the same thing. What's sad is that seems to be the ONLY legitiment header dyno on that whole site.
In the May 04 issue of Sport Compact car, they tested a stock 350Z Track, an S-Tune 350Z (Nismo catback), and then the R-Tune 350Z (Nismo headers, Nismo cams, Nismo CAI, Nismo catback, Nismo clutch, Nismo lightened flywheel).
Track
239whp/237wtq 14.2@98.5mph
S-Tune
243whp/238wtq 14.1@98.4mph
R-Tune
249whp/242wtq <----oddly close to the dyno graph you posted above. They're almost exact. 14.1@99.3mph
All cars ran 18" rims.
Good post. Shortly after I posted, I searched my350Z.com and saw the same thing. What's sad is that seems to be the ONLY legitiment header dyno on that whole site.
In the May 04 issue of Sport Compact car, they tested a stock 350Z Track, an S-Tune 350Z (Nismo catback), and then the R-Tune 350Z (Nismo headers, Nismo cams, Nismo CAI, Nismo catback, Nismo clutch, Nismo lightened flywheel).
Track
239whp/237wtq 14.2@98.5mph
S-Tune
243whp/238wtq 14.1@98.4mph
R-Tune
249whp/242wtq <----oddly close to the dyno graph you posted above. They're almost exact. 14.1@99.3mph
All cars ran 18" rims.
Originally Posted by Gsedan35
I have that SCC issue, they felt that the reason they did not test gains is because the ECU conspired to not allow them because they were using 91 octane gas vs 93. Jeff's car at performance nissan has those mods and he's dynoed well above oem.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
StreetStandard
Exhaust-Vendor
11
Jan 12, 2016 03:21 PM
poktanG35
Engine - Exhaust
23
Oct 26, 2015 03:32 AM




