Reviews Reviews of specific modifications, posted by members

Weapon-R secret weapon Intake.A+++

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Mar 25, 2006 | 10:19 AM
  #76  
RebelinRI's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 753
Likes: 0
Why is everyone crazy about HEAT for intakes. Yes it does take away A BIT but don't get all bent out of shape about it!!!!!
 
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2006 | 12:07 PM
  #77  
Gdup35sedan's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
ENVautoDetailing.com
iTrader: (47)
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 9,257
Likes: 136
From: San Diego/Redondo Beach
Premier Member

Originally Posted by jersey-G
Would any of you think that it's probably best just to do the intake and plenum spacer mods at the same time?
I put on th spacer 4 days after i did the intake, but you can def. put them on at the same time.
-GP-
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2006 | 03:46 AM
  #78  
jersey-G's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,975
Likes: 4
From: Jersey
I just figured it would be logical to do this cuz you have to take off the CAI, or WAI as some people are claiming, to take off the plenum anyway. I guess it would save from doing the install twice. Oh and I checked and if I'm looking in the right spot I believe I have a Black MAF plug. Now if only I can get someone at Weapon-R to write me back I can give them my money!
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2006 | 11:31 AM
  #79  
g35rcr's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,080
Likes: 1
what part do you need jersey...pm me ill help
 
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2006 | 01:22 AM
  #80  
Gdup35sedan's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
ENVautoDetailing.com
iTrader: (47)
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 9,257
Likes: 136
From: San Diego/Redondo Beach
Premier Member

jersey, i think you'd be better off calling them to order.
-GP-
 
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2006 | 11:24 AM
  #81  
Endless G's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
From: GTA, Canada
ummm, anyone heard or have done the Blitz SUS Filter?!? How are they compared to the other ones!!
 
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2006 | 01:05 PM
  #82  
g35rcr's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,080
Likes: 1
ive heard good things about their filter
 
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2006 | 01:27 PM
  #83  
jersey-G's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,975
Likes: 4
From: Jersey
Finally ordered my Wepon-R intake yesterday! It should be here sometime next week and ready for a weekend install.
 
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2006 | 02:48 PM
  #84  
g35rcr's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,080
Likes: 1
what did you end up paying and which setup did you get
 
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2006 | 03:24 PM
  #85  
codeflux's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (26)
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,105
Likes: 4
From: San Francisco, CA
haha this thread is still alive! i am *still* very happy with my 3.5" Weapon-R
 
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2006 | 04:29 PM
  #86  
jersey-G's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,975
Likes: 4
From: Jersey
$285 for the 3.5" pipe and 4" filter. It's a bit high, but at least it's what I wanted. Now onto the plenum spacer, I'll save a little bit and not get the iso thermal.
 
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2006 | 02:53 AM
  #87  
Jeff92se's Avatar
Red Card Crew
iTrader: (24)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 37,810
Likes: 585
From: ɐʍ 'ǝlʇʇɐǝs
Premier Member

Is the rest of the tract 3.5" or does this 3.5" version feature couplers that neck it down? Why would an intake pipe that's larger than the oem maf/tb work better? What purpose of the "inner" chamber that I saw in some pics?
 
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2006 | 02:56 AM
  #88  
Gdup35sedan's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
ENVautoDetailing.com
iTrader: (47)
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 9,257
Likes: 136
From: San Diego/Redondo Beach
Premier Member

the inner chamber flows air through at a different rate than the outer tube so when they meet they create a velocity stack that forces more air into the plenum.
-GP-
 
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2006 | 11:34 AM
  #89  
ballisticus's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 923
Likes: 0
The whole intake is really a series of velocity stacks. The external end of the conical filter is stack #1, then inside the base of the filter is stack #2, then the pipe itself is a type of velocity stack, but really more of a venturi effect.

What I find the main advantage to be is that the pipe within a pipe design keeps the intake charge velocity higher at low RPM for better throttle response and low-mid torque. Then the larger 3.5" pipe allows for greater overall flow capacity for high RPM power. Kind of the best of both worlds.

Some engine designers use this technique as a variable tune intake manifold. When combined with variable cam timing, it can really flatten the torque curve.
 
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2006 | 10:24 AM
  #90  
amg35's Avatar
Florida G35 Club
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,126
Likes: 1
From: New Port Richey, Florida
Thanks for the input, Secret Weapon on the way.
 
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:20 PM.