So Cal Dyno Day
Originally Posted by GurgenPB
Hehe, thanks for teh message... I know, I have been holding on to that thing forever now... I will see him, I am sure he was half-joking.
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,054
Likes: 85
From: Los Angeles California
Hi Guys!
I finally have the program needed to open the Dynapack files.
Send me an email or PM with your email adress and I can send you your files with the viewer.
Eldy would you still be interested in exporting it all to excell?
Tony
I finally have the program needed to open the Dynapack files.
Send me an email or PM with your email adress and I can send you your files with the viewer.
Eldy would you still be interested in exporting it all to excell?
Tony
yeah i'll make everyone's chart in excel if they want me to. but y'all have to ask nicely. 
please send my runs (including the ones from '04) to heldridge@hotmail.com.
thanks tony!

please send my runs (including the ones from '04) to heldridge@hotmail.com.
thanks tony!
Hwy Tony,
Yes, having the viewer would be nice, since uou already gave me the runs themselves.
la400@gurgen.com
Thanks very much
Yes, having the viewer would be nice, since uou already gave me the runs themselves.
la400@gurgen.com
Thanks very much
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,846
Likes: 9
From: Toh-rensa,Ahteesia,Ahcadia,Montree Pak, Longa Beacha
Thanks Tony for sending the files.
Has anyone got this to work? When I try and import the runs, it says that it's not a recognized format.
Has anyone got this to work? When I try and import the runs, it says that it's not a recognized format.
Here is a comparison of my baseline from Sep. '04 and the past dyno day on Jul. '05. This data is very flimsy and is only intended to give an estimation of the change in power given by the modifications. PM me if you'd like the full error report.
<img src=https://g35driver.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=17954&stc=1>
There was an increase of approximately 2% area under the curve from the baseline to current from 4000 to 6300 RPM!
<img src=https://g35driver.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=17954&stc=1>
There was an increase of approximately 2% area under the curve from the baseline to current from 4000 to 6300 RPM!
Originally Posted by Hydrazine
Gurgen and Leo,
I sent you the files but it was kicked back as undeliverable. They may have been too large ~6 MB.
I sent you the files but it was kicked back as undeliverable. They may have been too large ~6 MB.
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,846
Likes: 9
From: Toh-rensa,Ahteesia,Ahcadia,Montree Pak, Longa Beacha
Here's my data. I think I managed to fix that exhaust leak that I was having that day. Who knows how much difference it made, but the car feels better in the mid range RPMs.
Each plot is actually the average of 2-3 plots in each configuration. I think that the average gives a better picture of what is going on, rather than just the best run. The runs are in 3rd gear, unless otherwise noted.
So I'm making less HP in the upper RPMs than before. I also had a pretty dramatic change in the air fuel once I added the Y-pipe and B-pipe, but above 4500, the A/F is still essentially the same as before.
Edit* also they shut the car down at 6300 in the previous runs, and at 6400 in this last run. I think it still had some juice left.
Each plot is actually the average of 2-3 plots in each configuration. I think that the average gives a better picture of what is going on, rather than just the best run. The runs are in 3rd gear, unless otherwise noted.
So I'm making less HP in the upper RPMs than before. I also had a pretty dramatic change in the air fuel once I added the Y-pipe and B-pipe, but above 4500, the A/F is still essentially the same as before.
Edit* also they shut the car down at 6300 in the previous runs, and at 6400 in this last run. I think it still had some juice left.
Last edited by E_K; Jul 26, 2005 at 05:49 PM.



