MLB Conspires against Angels!

Subscribe
Oct 16, 2005 | 12:14 AM
  #1  
Isn't It SICK all the Calls That are BLOWN!!!! And Go Against the Angels??? 3 Blown Calls WTF???!!!! I Know that the sox haven't been in the World Series since 1916 But This is Mother F*CKen Chicken $hit
Reply 0
Oct 16, 2005 | 03:30 AM
  #2  
Please it happens to every team, the Angel's got calls against the Yankees, quit your complaining.
Reply 0
Oct 16, 2005 | 05:48 AM
  #3  
game 2 was something to complain about.....but games 3 & 4 yankees had good and angels had bad pitching. angels are done IMO.
Reply 0
Oct 16, 2005 | 06:05 AM
  #4  
goodbye angels
Reply 0
Oct 16, 2005 | 06:06 AM
  #5  
Red *****
Reply 0
Oct 16, 2005 | 06:10 AM
  #6  
It gives you wings!
Reply 0
Oct 17, 2005 | 05:44 PM
  #7  
FUC* THE WHITE SOX! Pieces of SHIZ!
Reply 0
Oct 17, 2005 | 05:55 PM
  #8  
Quote: Please it happens to every team, the Angel's got calls against the Yankees, quit your complaining.

CANO WAS SAFE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply 0
Oct 17, 2005 | 06:56 PM
  #9  
Fawk them Yankee lover Umpires! Fawkin haterz! Go SOCAL!
Reply 0
Oct 17, 2005 | 07:05 PM
  #10  
I think the Angels need a new batting coach, because they couldn't hit a softball. Maybe next year?
Reply 0
Oct 17, 2005 | 07:08 PM
  #11  
angels got lots of bad calls, none of them were reversed, but when white soxs get 1 bad call, you can count on it being reversed

angels didn't have their best game but having every call going against them certainly helped the white soxs
Reply 0
Oct 18, 2005 | 03:06 AM
  #12  
they were robbed.
Reply 0
Oct 18, 2005 | 11:05 PM
  #13  
+1 to that. Angels were robbed. FAWK CHICAGO!
Reply 0
Oct 19, 2005 | 04:15 AM
  #14  
did anyone catch that Houston/STL game, i swear the announcers sounded like they were jynxing the crap out of the Astros.

They were like houston in thier history has never made it to the world series. They were up at the time then everything goes wrong. If Houston plays Chi town i think its all rigged.

Lets go STL, even though im a dodgers fan
Reply 0
Oct 19, 2005 | 01:43 PM
  #15  
Yep...I hear you on that Rashman!
Reply 0