302.4 whp

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Sep 25, 2011 | 02:59 PM
  #16  
Algy's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,281
Likes: 79
Originally Posted by Texasscout
I think what he's asking here is, why would you bump your rev limiter up so high on a valve train that not designed to handle it? Only the "Rev Up" motors were designed to run over 7k.

I mean, your Toruqe curve is already rolling off at 6K and your HP peak is about 6350, there's not much point in going past that.

Nice numbers anyway. I would love to get mine tuned too. At least get all I can get, like you have.
That is what I'm trying to say but also that I'm trying to figure out how he's able to go above 6750rpm without dropping a valve or busting something?! I mean it's awesome that he has that much rev rpm. I want that too but when I got my tune on my 5at, the tuner was afraid of raising the rev limiter bc I "was" going to drop a valve or bust something bc I didn't have new valves or cams that would suppOrt the high rev...
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2011 | 03:07 PM
  #17  
Algy's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,281
Likes: 79
Also from the looks of the chart, the rpm drops at 6900-7000 and ends there. I'm guessing and I could be wrong, but it seems like the tuner only bumped it up to 7k.. That sounds normal for a 5at but passed that it would detonating for the engine IMO. Unless you have new springs, valves, cams and all to support that high rpm.
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2011 | 06:49 PM
  #18  
butkiss1's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (34)
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,186
Likes: 60
From: Sherman Oaks CA
Originally Posted by Texasscout
I think what he's asking here is, why would you bump your rev limiter up so high on a valve train that not designed to handle it? Only the "Rev Up" motors were designed to run over 7k.

I mean, your Toruqe curve is already rolling off at 6K and your HP peak is about 6350, there's not much point in going past that.

Nice numbers anyway. I would love to get mine tuned too. At least get all I can get, like you have.
Shawn says that Infiniti bumps up the tach. It reads low. If its at 7200 the real engine rpm is more like 7000.

I never pull to 7600 .I shift at 7000
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2011 | 07:05 PM
  #19  
PAIXAO's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (14)
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 8,338
Likes: 445
From: The Commonwealth
What gear were you tuned in?
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2011 | 07:12 PM
  #20  
butkiss1's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (34)
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,186
Likes: 60
From: Sherman Oaks CA
Originally Posted by PAIXAO
What gear were you tuned in?
5AT 3rd
6MT 4t
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2011 | 07:54 PM
  #21  
Algy's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,281
Likes: 79
Originally Posted by butkiss1
Shawn says that Infiniti bumps up the tach. It reads low. If its at 7200 the real engine rpm is more like 7000.

I never pull to 7600 .I shift at 7000
That's awesome man! I wish my tuner would've let me bump it up pass 6800rpm bc with our newer year model.. Once we hit the limiter.. It's a fuel cutoff and it takes a while to get going again once you change the gears. That's what I hate about our year. With the 03-04 it's a limiter and you can bounce off of it as much as u want and there is no lag from hitting the limiter to shifting.. 06+ the computer stops throttle and once the gears are changed it will get back on to the gas. I want a higher rev so I don't make that mistake when I got passed the shifting point a little. I just want to make sure once I get anoter tune that it is ok for us to bump the rev limit a little higher without internals (valves,valve springs, cams etc.) without breaking something in the engine.
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2011 | 07:58 PM
  #22  
Algy's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,281
Likes: 79
I'm not hatting at all. I think it's awesome you have a high rev. I think the autos have a crappy rev... 7500 sounds perfect, but it is pointless if we are losing power up there. It's just cool having it. I'm sure others can agree with what I'm trying to say. 302 whp is awesome too! That means if you were in a dynojet you be hitting around the 260-270s. That's where I'm at 265whp. Thumbs up man!!
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2011 | 08:31 PM
  #23  
Xet's Avatar
Xet
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 4,197
Likes: 171
From: sj
Most definitely wayyyyy to high to be accurate, but congratulations none the less. We all know the feeling of dropping so much money (short of sc/t setup) and getting such small returns.
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2011 | 08:44 PM
  #24  
butkiss1's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (34)
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,186
Likes: 60
From: Sherman Oaks CA
Originally Posted by SE5spd
well one thing that does not make sense to me, ive seen him run at the track and he ran and trapped better then your listed times (unless you have new PB that you did not update?) so thats why im asking.

His loss can be attributed to
1.Traction
2.Long shifts
3.Lack of respect for a 5AT
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2011 | 08:49 PM
  #25  
bigc's Avatar
Wings Nation
iTrader: (59)
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,931
Likes: 626
From: SoCal
Premier Member

Originally Posted by butkiss1
Big C thank u for the helpful information.
Let me explain to you what's important to me.
Today I posted 303.2 at the dyno day.
Boosted4life posted 316.4 (he's got a revup motor
I'm just a 5 AT Non revup) we ran em and .......
He got owned . Or should I say crushed. ........ .....
That's what matters to me Big C.....
bro, there's no hate here. i'm glad you're happy with your number, but a dynapack number is useless for comparison or bragging rights. if you want a number worth a thread, head over to hb speed or specialty z up in chatsworth for a few pulls on a dynojet.

again, enjoy your car
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2011 | 08:53 PM
  #26  
SE5spd's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 837
Likes: 15
From: NORCAL/SOCAL
Originally Posted by butkiss1
His loss can be attributed to
1.Traction
2.Long shifts
3.Lack of respect for a 5AT:bowrofl:
how was he disrespecting autos?
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2011 | 08:54 PM
  #27  
butkiss1's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (34)
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,186
Likes: 60
From: Sherman Oaks CA
Originally Posted by bigc
bro, there's no hate here. i'm glad you're happy with your number, but a dynapack number is useless for comparison or bragging rights. if you want a number worth a thread, head over to hb speed or specialty z up in chatsworth for a few pulls on a dynojet.

again, enjoy your car
Oh Big C no offence taken.
All good big homie
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2011 | 08:57 PM
  #28  
butkiss1's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (34)
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,186
Likes: 60
From: Sherman Oaks CA
Originally Posted by SE5spd
how was he disrespecting autos?
It was a joke man.
But its just nice when the 5AT triumphs over a 6MT.
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2011 | 09:03 PM
  #29  
Jairen's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,544
Likes: 150
From: Bremerton, Wa
Nice numbers man! Keep it going for more HP!

I will just say that I have hung with auto sedans who were way more modded than I am at the track.
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2011 | 09:06 PM
  #30  
chink-ah-saur's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (13)
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,942
Likes: 297
From: AsiaSF,ca
Bet yall wont foot race tho..lol
 
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:43 PM.