G35S - Replacing front stock rims with rear stock

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jun 8, 2009 | 12:24 PM
  #16  
Wes_888's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,904
Likes: 1
From: Toronto, Canada
Originally Posted by InTgr8r
I used to thing the same as you....
The newer hubcentric spacers with built in studs are quite good.
Even Porsche uses them on their OE setup.


e.g. the Ichiba V2
Ian would u say, in terms of safety...

are spacers with seperate longer studs safer than the ones with the built in studs?
 
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2009 | 01:40 AM
  #17  
aozmaxed's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 107
Likes: 2
From: Chino Hills, CA
Need pics of this set up, guys. Let's post them to help decide, with or without spacers. Thx!!
 
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2009 | 09:33 PM
  #18  
MojoKidd's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
From: Spring, Tx
Originally Posted by aozmaxed
Need pics of this set up, guys. Let's post them to help decide, with or without spacers. Thx!!
Save your money, I'm running OEM 8.5" x 18" with 245/45-r18 on all four corners without spacers, no rubs. I can't even tell the fronts stick out 8mm more. I like the fact that I can rotate my tires every oil change.
 
Attached Thumbnails G35S - Replacing front stock rims with rear stock-g35s-259.jpg   G35S - Replacing front stock rims with rear stock-g35s-258.jpg  
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2009 | 02:40 PM
  #19  
ampsucker's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 101
Likes: 3
From: Southeast Kansas
i'm approaching this from a slightly different angle.

i was thinking of getting a second set of "front" rims and running them on the rear to achieve rotation ability. so, i would have 18x7.5 rims all around with 45 mm offset.

i suspect a lot of you will cry foul, that this isn't a good idea due to looks or traction, but i was wondering if there would really be all that much differnce.

i see 5mm difference in offset (the rears would not be quite as close to the outside of the fender) which is barely noticeable.

as far as traction, i think the tire design and compounds make more difference than the size.

i see more tire options in the 225/50-18 range and more affordable as well as the option of going to a 55 series tire that rides more like a grand touring tire than a sport model.

narrower tires are safer in the rain - less prone to hydroplaning.

narrower tires offer slightly improvemed mileage.

anybody see a problem with doing this? i'm going to see the dealer this weekend for an alignment and was going to price rims while there.

thanks for your input!

amp
 
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2009 | 02:45 PM
  #20  
popcornten's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Originally Posted by ampsucker
i'm approaching this from a slightly different angle.

i was thinking of getting a second set of "front" rims and running them on the rear to achieve rotation ability. so, i would have 18x7.5 rims all around with 45 mm offset.

i suspect a lot of you will cry foul, that this isn't a good idea due to looks or traction, but i was wondering if there would really be all that much differnce.

i see 5mm difference in offset (the rears would not be quite as close to the outside of the fender) which is barely noticeable.

as far as traction, i think the tire design and compounds make more difference than the size.

i see more tire options in the 225/50-18 range and more affordable as well as the option of going to a 55 series tire that rides more like a grand touring tire than a sport model.

narrower tires are safer in the rain - less prone to hydroplaning.

narrower tires offer slightly improvemed mileage.

anybody see a problem with doing this? i'm going to see the dealer this weekend for an alignment and was going to price rims while there.

thanks for your input!

amp
I have my full set of stock wheels waiting for a new home. If you wanted the front's and we could find someone who needs rears I'd split them up no prob, maybe?


And to add to the thread - I've run rear 350z rims 245/45-18 on the fronts and they look/fit just fine.... well they look like sh*t, but they fit fine hahah
 
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2009 | 02:46 PM
  #21  
snowcrossmxz's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 847
Likes: 3
From: NH
Originally Posted by ampsucker
i'm approaching this from a slightly different angle.

i was thinking of getting a second set of "front" rims and running them on the rear to achieve rotation ability. so, i would have 18x7.5 rims all around with 45 mm offset.

i suspect a lot of you will cry foul, that this isn't a good idea due to looks or traction, but i was wondering if there would really be all that much differnce.

i see 5mm difference in offset (the rears would not be quite as close to the outside of the fender) which is barely noticeable.

as far as traction, i think the tire design and compounds make more difference than the size.

i see more tire options in the 225/50-18 range and more affordable as well as the option of going to a 55 series tire that rides more like a grand touring tire than a sport model.

narrower tires are safer in the rain - less prone to hydroplaning.

narrower tires offer slightly improvemed mileage.

anybody see a problem with doing this? i'm going to see the dealer this weekend for an alignment and was going to price rims while there.

thanks for your input!

amp
amp, i don't see any "problems" going ether way.

its all about what you are looking for.

as u stated going with 7.5 on all 4's has some benefits. i mean the XS does it right?

the only thing i can thing of is the looks of how far the wheels stick out in the rear
and thats just a personal preference thing.

if ur above stated beni's are what you are looking for then i say go for it
how much do you want for your 8.5 rears?
 
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2009 | 02:55 PM
  #22  
popcornten's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Originally Posted by snowcrossmxz
amp, i don't see any "problems" going ether way.

its all about what you are looking for.

as u stated going with 7.5 on all 4's has some benefits. i mean the XS does it right?

the only thing i can thing of is the looks of how far the wheels stick out in the rear
and thats just a personal preference thing.

if ur above stated beni's are what you are looking for then i say go for it
how much do you want for your 8.5 rears?
Me? I was looking maybe 300 rims only for the two rears (the tires are shot). They have minor rash, I can send you pictures. PM me if you're interested so we dont jack his thread
 
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2009 | 11:57 PM
  #23  
MojoKidd's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
From: Spring, Tx
Originally Posted by ampsucker
i'm approaching this from a slightly different angle.

i was thinking of getting a second set of "front" rims and running them on the rear to achieve rotation ability. so, i would have 18x7.5 rims all around with 45 mm offset.

i suspect a lot of you will cry foul, that this isn't a good idea due to looks or traction, but i was wondering if there would really be all that much difference.

i see 5mm difference in offset (the rears would not be quite as close to the outside of the fender) which is barely noticeable.

as far as traction, i think the tire design and compounds make more difference than the size.

i see more tire options in the 225/50-18 range and more affordable as well as the option of going to a 55 series tire that rides more like a grand touring tire than a sport model.
narrower tires are safer in the rain - less prone to hydroplaning.

narrower tires offer slightly improvement mileage.

anybody see a problem with doing this? i'm going to see the dealer this weekend for an alignment and was going to price rims while there.

thanks for your input!

amp
I just don't see that many choices in a 225/50-r18 tire size. I guess if you want to go with an all season touring tire, 225/55-r18 would be the logical choice.

I would be very surprised if you get better gas milelage with a narrower tire. I think driving habits and tire inflation have more of an effect.

Handling is definalty not going to improve if you go with a taller all season. Each to there own.

Let us know how much the dealer wants for two OEM 18x7.5 wheels. That should be good for a chuckle.

Good luck, post some pics when your done.
 
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2009 | 01:59 AM
  #24  
popcornten's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Don't mean to keep jacking - but if anyone's actually looking to go 225 all around I've got two for sale (possibly 4)
 
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2009 | 10:30 AM
  #25  
aozmaxed's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 107
Likes: 2
From: Chino Hills, CA
Originally Posted by MojoKidd
Save your money, I'm running OEM 8.5" x 18" with 245/45-r18 on all four corners without spacers, no rubs. I can't even tell the fronts stick out 8mm more. I like the fact that I can rotate my tires every oil change.
Good pics so far. Do you have more shots showing both front and rear in profile, all 8.5"? If all goes well, I'll have a set of fronts (7.5"), no tires, for sale this weekend. Shoot me a pm if interested. I'll be reasonable.
 
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2009 | 10:33 AM
  #26  
MoJ's Avatar
MoJ
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Well crap. My source for a set of rear wheels fell through. The wheels were damaged in shipment and the supplier is having trouble finding a second set.
 

Last edited by MoJ; Jun 27, 2009 at 10:39 AM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TWASkyliner
G35 Coupe V35 2003 - 07
26
Feb 8, 2020 08:00 PM
CrazyLogic219
G35 Coupe V35 2003 - 07
26
Jul 23, 2015 10:58 AM
Cskeet
New Members Check In
10
Jul 19, 2015 12:38 AM
nascarbuff17
G35 Coupe V35 2003 - 07
5
Jul 16, 2015 10:23 AM
RAVSPEC
Wheels & Tires-Vendor
0
Jul 16, 2015 01:58 AM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:41 AM.