My morning at . GTM!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #631  
Old 12-17-2008, 11:04 AM
IvoryPearl07G's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
Posts: 1,127
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
i am gonna guess thats its a small discaimer incase a turbo goes to pot.

i say you can run them, it might only marginally mess with the lifespan of the turbo(s). I say run the cats when you need to pass a sniffer test, then replace with testpipes the rest of the time.



I also went straight out the back when i turboed my other car. the most flow is always best for a turbo. any lil backpressure puts stress on the exhaust side, which can mess up the whole turbo over time. But if you absolutely need some cats in there, a metallic HFC is fine to run IMO. other problems should show their ugly head before a blown turbo when running 150+rwhp over stock.
 
  #632  
Old 12-17-2008, 11:14 AM
Q8y_drifter's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 2,207
Received 41 Likes on 26 Posts
i see now. i'm still a noob in the FI department Thanks!
 
  #633  
Old 12-17-2008, 11:17 AM
LiquidGx's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Greater Cincinnati
Posts: 1,203
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Without cats, you can run leaded fuel (VP16 is the ****) and really turn up the boost, assuming the block can take it.
 
  #634  
Old 12-17-2008, 11:28 AM
_jb's Avatar
_jb
_jb is offline
Photographer

Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: St.Pete, FL
Posts: 5,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think leaded fuel is still bad for the O2 sensors...

I'd be careful running leaded fuel...
 
  #635  
Old 12-17-2008, 11:58 AM
kool_yaar's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 5,208
Received 184 Likes on 159 Posts
im amazed how this car looks so close to stock even on the underbody and instead packs an extra 150whp, looks like someone just added a few intake pipes and a custom exhaust and thats it....
 
  #636  
Old 12-17-2008, 03:49 PM
terrycs's Avatar
Registered User

Thread Starter
iTrader: (54)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,519
Likes: 0
Received 32 Likes on 27 Posts
The recommendation for not using HFC orignally came from Fast Intentions and from GTM. The thought is the cats would start clogging over time (from melting?). It may be possible to put one further downstream, but that is another project for someone else. FI also mentioned the possibility of using a platinum cat, but it would be big $$.

As far as I know, CA does not have only a sniffer test for emissions, but also a visual test which I'm certain this setup would not legally pass, so I may as well leave the TP on there.

As for running leaded fuel ... IMO, why bother with the trouble of finding it if you can make more than enough WHp (unless big numbers are the goal)? GTM just got their shop HR to about 580 WHp at 14 psi on pump gas ... using UPREV. More than enough power for me from a stock block.
 
  #637  
Old 12-18-2008, 11:28 AM
silver g's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ladera Ranch / San Clemente
Posts: 2,374
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by terrycs
The recommendation for not using HFC orignally came from Fast Intentions and from GTM. The thought is the cats would start clogging over time (from melting?). It may be possible to put one further downstream, but that is another project for someone else. FI also mentioned the possibility of using a platinum cat, but it would be big $$.

As far as I know, CA does not have only a sniffer test for emissions, but also a visual test which I'm certain this setup would not legally pass, so I may as well leave the TP on there.

As for running leaded fuel ... IMO, why bother with the trouble of finding it if you can make more than enough WHp (unless big numbers are the goal)? GTM just got their shop HR to about 580 WHp at 14 psi on pump gas ... using UPREV. More than enough power for me from a stock block.
I would not worry about the visual Terry, your setup is so stealth they will not be able to tell the difference. Also they do not look under the car either, so no worries there.

I think if you were able to put a cat on there at some point you will probably breathe pretty clean as well.

On a lighter note you have quite a while before you have to deal with smog...so have fun with it, and congrats again on it finally being finished.
 
  #638  
Old 12-18-2008, 01:11 PM
ttrank's Avatar
Grocery getter

iTrader: (57)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 27,305
Received 190 Likes on 60 Posts
Yes leaded fuel is not good for O2 sensors. You can run it from time to time but if you do it a lot you will kill them.

IMO the best leaded fuel for the money out there right now is VP Q16. Many are seeing 3-5% more power than C16 because Q16 has more O2 in it and is made to run better in lean conditions. It is also the same price as C16.
Only drawback IMO is you can't find it as easy and you can't run C16 on a Q16 tune.
 
  #639  
Old 12-18-2008, 01:12 PM
ttrank's Avatar
Grocery getter

iTrader: (57)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 27,305
Received 190 Likes on 60 Posts
Terry if you are running test pipes you will be able to smell the difference. I would bet that any decent inspector will be able to tell your car doesn't have cats on it. I would look into getting a set of cats that can be bolted in for inspection time.

If it's like AZ you can test once and if you fail you get a free re-try.
 
  #640  
Old 12-18-2008, 01:13 PM
LiquidGx's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Greater Cincinnati
Posts: 1,203
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Leaded is bad for the O2 sensors, it makes them laggy and slow to react. However, if you are only using it at the track a few times a year, it shouldn't have any long term effect.

As for making enough power, once you have the mod bug, its never enough. Why stop at 14psi, why not 20, etc. I run my DSM to 28psi on c16 but only 18-20 on 93 pump.

Q16 is some kick *** stuff but isn't ~25 a gallon?

Bottom line, looks like your car is quite healthy, enjoy!
 
  #641  
Old 12-18-2008, 01:36 PM
ttrank's Avatar
Grocery getter

iTrader: (57)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 27,305
Received 190 Likes on 60 Posts
I only paid 13.80/gal for Q16 ($138 for 10gal). it was the same price as C16 when we did my race tune.

I agree the mod bug is crazy! I thought my car was so fast when I first got it. Then SC... too slow. Then TT.. weeeeee..... too slow. Now built TT daily tune is 13-14psi and 20 on race gas. No idea what's next. This seems pretty damn fast.
 
  #642  
Old 12-18-2008, 02:18 PM
terrycs's Avatar
Registered User

Thread Starter
iTrader: (54)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,519
Likes: 0
Received 32 Likes on 27 Posts
Originally Posted by ttrank
I only paid 13.80/gal for Q16 ($138 for 10gal). it was the same price as C16 when we did my race tune.

I agree the mod bug is crazy! I thought my car was so fast when I first got it. Then SC... too slow. Then TT.. weeeeee..... too slow. Now built TT daily tune is 13-14psi and 20 on race gas. No idea what's next. This seems pretty damn fast.
Seems like the power is easy to get ... the trick is hooking it up. Sorry, unlike you, I only have stock internals, so I'm not going to turn up the boost anytime soon. Maybe internals after I recover from this phase ...
 

Last edited by terrycs; 12-18-2008 at 02:22 PM.
  #643  
Old 12-18-2008, 03:03 PM
GreenGoblin's Avatar
The goblin resurrection

iTrader: (66)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: In my garage
Posts: 25,863
Received 187 Likes on 95 Posts
I want a q16 tune
 
  #644  
Old 12-18-2008, 03:46 PM
Q8y_drifter's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 2,207
Received 41 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by terrycs
Seems like the power is easy to get ... the trick is hooking it up. Sorry, unlike you, I only have stock internals, so I'm not going to turn up the boost anytime soon. Maybe internals after I recover from this phase ...
any idea how much boost/hp the internals can handle??
 
  #645  
Old 12-18-2008, 04:12 PM
ugaexploder's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: ATL
Posts: 2,288
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
so who's next in line for the GTM TT kit?
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: My morning at . GTM!



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:26 PM.