Thinking of running 245-35-19 on all 4 coupe wheels for my sedan
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 37,810
Likes: 585
From: ɐʍ 'ǝlʇʇɐǝs

Pilot sport max summer tire. Would have been nicer to have the PS2s but can't be too choosey.
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires....el=Pilot+Sport.
I was also looking at the RE050s in 245-35-19 all around (nice tire but 140 UTOG) or the Dunlop direzza 101s in the same size (but their wet performance was horrible). I can't have **** wet performance up here.
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires....el=Pilot+Sport.
I was also looking at the RE050s in 245-35-19 all around (nice tire but 140 UTOG) or the Dunlop direzza 101s in the same size (but their wet performance was horrible). I can't have **** wet performance up here.
lol ^ im running the yokohama S drive and they are awsome, took 500 miles or so to brake them in , they replaced the oem re050.
for the 255 40 19 you WILL need to roll the fenders in the rear.
for the 255 40 19 you WILL need to roll the fenders in the rear.
I also went with 225/40/19 and 255/35/19 with my G coupes. Ride is still good and it keeps it pretty damn close to spec. No rubbing issues either with my Z front springs and G coupe rear suspension.
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 37,810
Likes: 585
From: ɐʍ 'ǝlʇʇɐǝs

Awesome. That's the 2nd person to mention no rubbing issues w/ the 255-35 combo. Other guy was running Kumhos in that size.
Who thinks we should have a tire test sticky in our little section? I could post a 2005 R&T tire test and I found a tire test from Europe that looks at the Verdenstien tires (rated #1 on that test).
Who thinks we should have a tire test sticky in our little section? I could post a 2005 R&T tire test and I found a tire test from Europe that looks at the Verdenstien tires (rated #1 on that test).
Awesome. That's the 2nd person to mention no rubbing issues w/ the 255-35 combo. Other guy was running Kumhos in that size.
Who thinks we should have a tire test sticky in our little section? I could post a 2005 R&T tire test and I found a tire test from Europe that looks at the Verdenstien tires (rated #1 on that test).
Who thinks we should have a tire test sticky in our little section? I could post a 2005 R&T tire test and I found a tire test from Europe that looks at the Verdenstien tires (rated #1 on that test).

Pic for reference... Z front springs, G coupe shocks/springs
225/40/18F / 255/35/19R BOTH TIRES are TOYO Proxes T1-R
Last edited by blklude98; Mar 10, 2009 at 11:39 AM.
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 37,810
Likes: 585
From: ɐʍ 'ǝlʇʇɐǝs

Finally got them mounted. And just because I'm a weight *****:
oem RE050s:
225-40-19 = 25 lbs.
245-40-19 = 30 lbs.
Michelin Pilot Sports:
225-40-19 = 21 lbs.
255-35-19 = 24 lbs.
I saved 4 lbs off the fronts. 19s & tires = 43 lbs. vs 47 lbs.
I saved 6 lbs of the rears. 19s & tires = 47 lbs. vs 53 lbs.
All weights are probably +/- 1 lb or so.
Not bad for a 220 utog vs 140 and a better tire review.
For reference, my oem 17 wheel and blizzak 215-55-17 came in at 45lbs each. I'm lighter them oem in front and just a tad heavier in the rear. Not bad for going +2 and 10mm / 40mm wider!
oem RE050s:
225-40-19 = 25 lbs.
245-40-19 = 30 lbs.
Michelin Pilot Sports:
225-40-19 = 21 lbs.
255-35-19 = 24 lbs.
I saved 4 lbs off the fronts. 19s & tires = 43 lbs. vs 47 lbs.
I saved 6 lbs of the rears. 19s & tires = 47 lbs. vs 53 lbs.
All weights are probably +/- 1 lb or so.
Not bad for a 220 utog vs 140 and a better tire review.
For reference, my oem 17 wheel and blizzak 215-55-17 came in at 45lbs each. I'm lighter them oem in front and just a tad heavier in the rear. Not bad for going +2 and 10mm / 40mm wider!
Last edited by Jeff92se; Jan 6, 2010 at 08:49 PM.
Finally got them mounted. And just because I'm a weight *****:
oem RE050s:
225-40-19 = 25 lbs.
245-40-19 = 30 lbs.
Michelin Pilot Sports:
225-40-19 = 21 lbs.
255-35-19 = 24 lbs.
I saved 4 lbs off the fronts. 19s & tires = 43 lbs. vs 47 lbs.
I saved 6 lbs of the rears. 10x & tires = 47 lbs. vs 53 lbs.
All weights are probably +/- 1 lb or so.
Not bad for a 220 utog vs 140 and a better tire review.
oem RE050s:
225-40-19 = 25 lbs.
245-40-19 = 30 lbs.
Michelin Pilot Sports:
225-40-19 = 21 lbs.
255-35-19 = 24 lbs.
I saved 4 lbs off the fronts. 19s & tires = 43 lbs. vs 47 lbs.
I saved 6 lbs of the rears. 10x & tires = 47 lbs. vs 53 lbs.
All weights are probably +/- 1 lb or so.
Not bad for a 220 utog vs 140 and a better tire review.
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 37,810
Likes: 585
From: ɐʍ 'ǝlʇʇɐǝs

Here's a pic with the oem 225-40 and 245-40 19s on. Coupe rear/Z front springs.
I'll post pics of the new setup when I actually mount these on the G. Still a slight threat of snow here.

The rear 255s aren't nearly as wide as I would have thought. And the 225 fronts seem narrower then the bridgestones.
I'll post pics of the new setup when I actually mount these on the G. Still a slight threat of snow here.

The rear 255s aren't nearly as wide as I would have thought. And the 225 fronts seem narrower then the bridgestones.
Finally got them mounted. And just because I'm a weight *****:
oem RE050s:
225-40-19 = 25 lbs.
245-40-19 = 30 lbs.
Michelin Pilot Sports:
225-40-19 = 21 lbs.
255-35-19 = 24 lbs.
I saved 4 lbs off the fronts. 19s & tires = 43 lbs. vs 47 lbs.
I saved 6 lbs of the rears. 10x & tires = 47 lbs. vs 53 lbs.
All weights are probably +/- 1 lb or so.
Not bad for a 220 utog vs 140 and a better tire review.
oem RE050s:
225-40-19 = 25 lbs.
245-40-19 = 30 lbs.
Michelin Pilot Sports:
225-40-19 = 21 lbs.
255-35-19 = 24 lbs.
I saved 4 lbs off the fronts. 19s & tires = 43 lbs. vs 47 lbs.
I saved 6 lbs of the rears. 10x & tires = 47 lbs. vs 53 lbs.
All weights are probably +/- 1 lb or so.
Not bad for a 220 utog vs 140 and a better tire review.



