Good low end, no top end? true or false?
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 841
Likes: 1
From: GTA - Ontario Canada
Good low end, no top end? true or false?
Hey, upcomming g35 owner, what i've been told by some test drivers is that the car has a really good low end punch, but the top end isn't there at all, true, false, takes?
Some have said that the accord v6 6speed feels or could faster then the g35 because of the bad top end
Some have said that the accord v6 6speed feels or could faster then the g35 because of the bad top end
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 13,068
Likes: 101
From: Southern Cali --> 818
Please dont mention Honda and G35 coupe in the same sentence; they are in 2 different leagues. It its offensive to [me] and many other coupe owners. But if you have to compare a Honda to a G35 coupe, atleast let it be an s2000, not an accord
.
.
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 30,341
Likes: 9
From: Cambridge, Ont. Canada
Originally Posted by netcbc
Hey, upcomming g35 owner, what i've been told by some test drivers is that the car has a really good low end punch, but the top end isn't there at all, true, false, takes?
Some have said that the accord v6 6speed feels or could faster then the g35 because of the bad top end
Some have said that the accord v6 6speed feels or could faster then the g35 because of the bad top end
...and according to my brother, his new accord V6 is not as quick as the G-Coupe he had.
C.
Eh. The top end isn't excellent, but it's decent. But then again, I'm coming from two turbo cars... one being Supra with big T-78 single turbo
The low end torque is awesome, though. Makes daily driving very easy and you don't have to shift as much.
The low end torque is awesome, though. Makes daily driving very easy and you don't have to shift as much.
Trending Topics
Originally Posted by Rookie84
Eh. The top end isn't excellent, but it's decent. But then again, I'm coming from two turbo cars... one being Supra with big T-78 single turbo
The low end torque is awesome, though. Makes daily driving very easy and you don't have to shift as much.
The low end torque is awesome, though. Makes daily driving very easy and you don't have to shift as much.
Dont get it because you think its fast. Its not
, but the looks make up for that.
Its not slow either just wouldn't brag about speed. For the price you can get faster cars, but most of us wanted more than say an sti with no stereo or leather, navi, etc...
, but the looks make up for that.
Its not slow either just wouldn't brag about speed. For the price you can get faster cars, but most of us wanted more than say an sti with no stereo or leather, navi, etc...
I thought our G's has a lot of top end speed, from what i hear from people racing the STi at least. Forumers says that they can slowly catch up after after a certain speed. Thats what i thought at least!
And most of us, G owners, certainly bought it because it is sexy as hell! but still retain decent performance! Not everyone likes STi or Evos, those performance monsters!
cheers!
And most of us, G owners, certainly bought it because it is sexy as hell! but still retain decent performance! Not everyone likes STi or Evos, those performance monsters!
cheers!
Originally Posted by jackygor
I thought our G's has a lot of top end speed, from what i hear from people racing the STi at least. Forumers says that they can slowly catch up after after a certain speed. Thats what i thought at least!
And most of us, G owners, certainly bought it because it is sexy as hell! but still retain decent performance! Not everyone likes STi or Evos, those performance monsters!
cheers!
And most of us, G owners, certainly bought it because it is sexy as hell! but still retain decent performance! Not everyone likes STi or Evos, those performance monsters!
cheers!
Last edited by phenom1011; Jun 30, 2006 at 08:33 PM.
Originally Posted by phenom1011
Dont get it because you think its fast. Its not
, but the looks make up for that.
Its not slow either just wouldn't brag about speed. For the price you can get faster cars, but most of us wanted more than say an sti with no stereo or leather, navi, etc...
, but the looks make up for that.
Its not slow either just wouldn't brag about speed. For the price you can get faster cars, but most of us wanted more than say an sti with no stereo or leather, navi, etc...
Originally Posted by netcbc
Hey, upcomming g35 owner, what i've been told by some test drivers is that the car has a really good low end punch, but the top end isn't there at all, true, false, takes?
Some have said that the accord v6 6speed feels or could faster then the g35 because of the bad top end
Some have said that the accord v6 6speed feels or could faster then the g35 because of the bad top end
You're not considering buying an Accord are you?
ENVautoDetailing.com
iTrader: (47)
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 9,257
Likes: 136
From: San Diego/Redondo Beach

Honda = no torque
G35 = torque
i dont know about everyone elses but my low end is pretty quick and the top end performance isnt far behind it, my car shines above 5500rpm's.
-GP-
G35 = torque
i dont know about everyone elses but my low end is pretty quick and the top end performance isnt far behind it, my car shines above 5500rpm's.
-GP-
ENVautoDetailing.com
iTrader: (47)
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 9,257
Likes: 136
From: San Diego/Redondo Beach

Originally Posted by FIDDY
Very true. Sheer performance is definitely not it's forte. I've been noticing too lately that the top end is not really there. The low end grunt is useful for daily driving but the power seems to die down after about 5.5k or so. I'm coming from an rsx-s which is prolly the opposite with an 8.6k rev limit. The top end on that was way more potent and fun than the g, but it's low end was a hassle for daily driving. Even though the lack of torque, i'm sure it would've given G's a run for their money. *sniff* i miss that car......
just a thought........ its still a honda...
-GP-



