ok for about the same price the 05 is a little cheaper than the 03

theres a 2003 g35 coupe going for 16.9k with 26k miles, is that fishy?

or a 2005 g35 coupe going for 15.9k with 50k miles.

Which one would you go for?

Probably the 05.

Need more info.

Where is that 05 at if you don't mind me asking? I'm working with some dealers now I would love to put that agaisnt them

carfax on both vehicles?

It's in dallas texas, but you cant really use that price because my friends a car dealer so he's giving me a better deal on it.



And both cars are clean titles, and have about the same features. 03 has navi though.

Sounds like a coin-flip to me.

2003 has navigation (which I could care less about) but also has older interior. UNLESS it was owned by a grandma who never used it much, then this would be a great deal.

2005 has the updated interior, but also has more miles per year put on its engine.

Coin-flip.

I would go with 2005.. It has a lot better interior and rev-up engine

+1 i'd go with 05 too.

something is fishy with the 2003 because of the low price price and low miles. Also, Carfax is a bunch of bullS***. If you don't report damage or a wreck (no cops on scene) and have it fixed 3rd party IE: body shop, there will be no reports and therefor, no car fax. You can get each car checked by a 3rd party mechanic. I would have been screwed if i just relied on car fax when i was looking for my G..

All in all, go take both of them to a mechanic to have them inspected. And i have a good place for you to have them looked if you need at since we both live in the DFW area.

Throw me a PM if you need.

Def go with the 05.. Even the 05/06 isn't as luxury as it should be for a car built in 06 but the 03/04 is bad. Ive been in more luxury budget cars, My 2000 JETTA VR6 was 1000x more luxury. Im sure with that little mileage both would be more than fine. I love my 06 but I wish it was a little more upscale ( the interior )

i will pick 05. if the 03 is AT, i heard that they have transmission issues.