Care & Detailing Washing, waxing, cleaning, caring.

Menzerna IP

Old Jun 23, 2008 | 03:44 PM
  #1  
Blk6MT's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Menzerna IP

Has anyone here used Menzerna IP for light scratches? How did it work on G35 paint?
 
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2008 | 08:10 PM
  #2  
Scrooge's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,265
Likes: 0
From: Palmdale Ca
On my Diamond graphite. It remove them with easy leaving the paint lsp ready. Used it with any orange pad.
 
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2008 | 08:56 PM
  #3  
redlude97's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (25)
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,911
Likes: 8
From: Seattle, WA
Anyone use both IP and optimum compound? I was using the OC this weekend, and while it does a decent job removing the majority of scratches, it just takes too long to break down, looking for something a bit faster, either IP or SIP
 
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2008 | 09:03 PM
  #4  
SCoupe's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 544
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
Haven't used IP but if it's near as good as 106ff it should be good stuff. I would like to hear your opinion after.
 
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2008 | 09:16 PM
  #5  
SpecC's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
106FF is enough for light swirls

IP is for heavier ones. Let me show you what i'm talking about on this MR2

Before



After

 
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2008 | 10:34 PM
  #6  
mtodde's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
^ that is a nice improvement...are you using a pc or a rotary?
 
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2008 | 10:56 PM
  #7  
TheIvoryG's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,242
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento, Ca
Originally Posted by redlude97
Anyone use both IP and optimum compound? I was using the OC this weekend, and while it does a decent job removing the majority of scratches, it just takes too long to break down, looking for something a bit faster, either IP or SIP
I can't speak highly enough for SIP. Has great bite, but good working time and little dusting. To top it off, it finishes off with a great shine. Even with DG I doubt you will need another finishing polish because the shine will be great. I have 106FF too, but rarely use it because SIP finishes off so nicely.
 
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2008 | 11:13 PM
  #8  
SpecC's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by mtodde
^ that is a nice improvement...are you using a pc or a rotary?
was done on a hitachi rotary on 1700 RPM and orange pad
 
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2008 | 11:35 PM
  #9  
Scrooge's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,265
Likes: 0
From: Palmdale Ca
Originally Posted by SCoupe
Haven't used IP but if it's near as good as 106ff it should be good stuff. I would like to hear your opinion after.
IP is not as good as 106ff. 106ff breaks down nicer then IP.
 
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2008 | 06:41 AM
  #10  
TOGWT's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 170
Likes: 4
From: London, UK / Ponte Vedra Beach, FL
a) The use of a duel level foam pad (primary / secondary) / single polish correction system; will change the way each polish works in accordance to which pad you use (i.e. use a polishing pad followed by a finishing pad) and will really heighten the paint finish shine.

b) For most paint correction use *PO 106 FA / 106 FF a Lake County (LC) White or Orange and PO 85 D3.01 polish with a (LC) Blue foam pad at 1000 RPM should be all you need.

c) For paint renovation use PO S34A Power Gloss (LC Purple wool pad 1500 – 1800 RPM). It has a short work time, slow cut but tends to ‘dust’


Coating Repair Product Summery - http://www.menzerna.de/fileadmin/be_...e/e_polish.pdf
 
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2008 | 12:11 PM
  #11  
Cassman's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 373
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by Scrooge
IP is not as good as 106ff. 106ff breaks down nicer then IP.
You are talking about two different levels of polishing. IP has more cutting than 106ff. You would use IP and then 106ff or FPII to finish the job.
 
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2008 | 02:55 PM
  #12  
Scrooge's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,265
Likes: 0
From: Palmdale Ca
Originally Posted by Cassman
You are talking about two different levels of polishing. IP has more cutting than 106ff. You would use IP and then 106ff or FPII to finish the job.
I know that. But I was asking the guys question. Don't you see my post.
 
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2008 | 04:01 PM
  #13  
Cassman's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 373
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by Scrooge
I know that. But I was asking the guys question. Don't you see my post.
Yeah, I assumed you know that. But I don't agree that it is better. It is made for a different purpose. It is different but not necessarily better. Better at final finishing - yes. Better at removing marks - no. I am not arguing with you in any way. I just think that those of us who know something about detailing should be careful in saying what is better or worse. I know you know that and maybe I am just reading too much into it. If so, I am sorry.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Detailed Image
Care & Detailing
4
Jul 16, 2008 12:05 PM
jtrudeau
Care & Detailing
4
Jun 22, 2007 07:14 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:23 AM.