second time at the track =)
#1
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Daly City, Cali
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
second time at the track =)
Hey everyone, I went to Infineon raceway last night and did better than I expected. But I had a horrible time going home, I was stuck in traffic for an hour and a half . My fastest for the night was on my third run 14.386@ 97.57
2004 premium sedan w/ 1/4 gas
Mods: gen 1 stillen catback, kinetix hfc, z-tube, 5/16 motordyne spacer, 17 stock w/ yoko yk520 215/55 30psi.
I got in 5 runs:
brktq 800
2.247 60'
6.159 330'
9.364 @ 76.45 1/8th mi
12.126 1000'
14.449@ 97.22 1/4mi
brktq 1000
2.244 60'
6.168 330'
9.375 @ 76.41 1/8th mi
12.138 1000'
14.456 @ 97.44 1/4mi
brktq 1500
2.239 60'
6.141 330'
9.330 @ 76.81 1/8th mi
12.079 1000'
14.386 @ 97.57 1/4mi
brktq 1200
2.245 60'
6.139 330'
9.344 @ 76.60 1/8th mi
12.098 1000'
14.409 @ 97.58 1/4mi
brktq 1800 too much wheel spin =(
2.328 60'
6.211 330'
9.384 @ 77.34 1/8th mi
12.113 1000'
14.407 @ 98.23 1/4mi
I'd love to do more to the car, but it's my gf's car now. I got an 08 tundra =) and it ran a 14.6 with intake and exhaust. Back on topic, for the last run I think it could be in the 14.2? if I dropped the 60' more. I feel like going again =) with different tires.
Thanks for looking!
2004 premium sedan w/ 1/4 gas
Mods: gen 1 stillen catback, kinetix hfc, z-tube, 5/16 motordyne spacer, 17 stock w/ yoko yk520 215/55 30psi.
I got in 5 runs:
brktq 800
2.247 60'
6.159 330'
9.364 @ 76.45 1/8th mi
12.126 1000'
14.449@ 97.22 1/4mi
brktq 1000
2.244 60'
6.168 330'
9.375 @ 76.41 1/8th mi
12.138 1000'
14.456 @ 97.44 1/4mi
brktq 1500
2.239 60'
6.141 330'
9.330 @ 76.81 1/8th mi
12.079 1000'
14.386 @ 97.57 1/4mi
brktq 1200
2.245 60'
6.139 330'
9.344 @ 76.60 1/8th mi
12.098 1000'
14.409 @ 97.58 1/4mi
brktq 1800 too much wheel spin =(
2.328 60'
6.211 330'
9.384 @ 77.34 1/8th mi
12.113 1000'
14.407 @ 98.23 1/4mi
I'd love to do more to the car, but it's my gf's car now. I got an 08 tundra =) and it ran a 14.6 with intake and exhaust. Back on topic, for the last run I think it could be in the 14.2? if I dropped the 60' more. I feel like going again =) with different tires.
Thanks for looking!
#3
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Daly City, Cali
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#6
According to the National Weather Service you were running under near perfect conditions. Your DA calculates to well below sea level. The track is already only at 177ft at it's highest point.
I used the baro pressure, humidity and temp times from 9pm.
Corrected, your time would actually be slower and ET would be lower.
DA at 8pm was -315 feet
DA at 9pm was -835 feet
The temp dropped by almost 10 degrees in that hour.
I used the baro pressure, humidity and temp times from 9pm.
Corrected, your time would actually be slower and ET would be lower.
DA at 8pm was -315 feet
DA at 9pm was -835 feet
The temp dropped by almost 10 degrees in that hour.
Last edited by PAIXAO; 10-29-2009 at 03:19 PM.
#7
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Daly City, Cali
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Trending Topics
#8
When most people use DA to recalc their times it's because they are in higher elevations. When the relative density is at 100 or above it's like they are running in a lower elevation. Basically it's a way to make sure everyone is playing on the same level. Someone who runs 13's in higher elevation may actually run 12's at sea level.
I adjusted the time for say 5pm at the track and your DA at that time was 430 feet. So your times were actually a little better.
Corrected they would be 14.35 @ 97.77
I adjusted the time for say 5pm at the track and your DA at that time was 430 feet. So your times were actually a little better.
Corrected they would be 14.35 @ 97.77
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
joel extreme
SOCAL Meetings & Events
0
08-07-2015 03:09 AM
joel extreme
SOCAL Meetings & Events
3
07-23-2015 04:13 AM