Engine, Drivetrain & Forced-Induction Have Technical Questions or Done Modifications to the G35? Find out the answer in here! (View All Posts)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

MREV2 with 5/16 spacer installed with Dyno

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 01:40 PM
  #47  
clokwork's Avatar
Cmon Son!
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,328
Likes: 0
From: NoVA
I have hte 05 6MT as well. I am highly interested in the MREV2 w/spacer, but I dont want to have to worry about running lean. Is the UTEC a must with this to do this safely?
 
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 02:43 PM
  #49  
ATL_Red_G35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 1
From: ATL
Originally Posted by shimmy
Can someone please clarify what the difference is (if any) between:
MREV
MREV2
MREV+

I have an 06 6MT and it looks to be the consensus that the best combo for me is 5/16" spacer and MREV2, correct?

Finally, where are you all purchasing them from? Motordyne directly?

Thanks in advance!
From my understanding correctly.

MREV: For 05-06 Revup motors (300bhp). It includes 03-04 (287bhp)stock Lower Plenum and 5/16" Spacer kit. This was offered as a package.

MREV+: Originally designed for 05-06, an improved version of the MREV. Same as the MREV package but the lower plenum has been modified aka machined to improve better performance. However, Tony from Motordyne tested it on 03-04 cars and they shows good gains as well.

MREV2: A more refined version of the MREV+ where there're extra machining done to the lower plenum. However, not offered as a package anymore. Just only the machined 03-04 lower plenum. This is being offered individual and not a package is because it's suitable for BOTH 03-04 motors and 05-06 motors. Whereas the 03-04 folks already have the spacer kit and just want to get the lower plenum done.


So you have an 05-06, you'd want to get the MREV2 AND the spacer kit if you want to squeeze more power out of it.

Someone please correct me if I'm wrong.
 
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 03:25 PM
  #50  
Ivory05G's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
That's my basic understanding of it as well.

Does anyone know what "machining" was done, or is it a secret...
 
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 03:54 PM
  #51  
KenK2's Avatar
The Pole
iTrader: (2)
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, Az.
Originally Posted by Ivory05G
That's my basic understanding of it as well.

Does anyone know what "machining" was done, or is it a secret...

You can totally tell when you get the plenum back.. Not sure if it is a secret or not but its pretty noticeable.. Makes a huge difference tho!
 
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 08:33 PM
  #52  
Hydrazine's Avatar
Former G35driver Vendor
iTrader: (23)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,054
Likes: 85
From: Los Angeles California
Originally Posted by clokwork
I have hte 05 6MT as well. I am highly interested in the MREV2 w/spacer, but I dont want to have to worry about running lean. Is the UTEC a must with this to do this safely?
If you have a REVUP it won't run lean. The newer ECU adapts more readily than the prior version.
 
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 10:28 PM
  #53  
shimmy's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
Thumbs up Thx for the clarification

Originally Posted by ATL_Red_G35
From my understanding correctly.

MREV: For 05-06 Revup motors (300bhp). It includes 03-04 (287bhp)stock Lower Plenum and 5/16" Spacer kit. This was offered as a package.

MREV+: Originally designed for 05-06, an improved version of the MREV. Same as the MREV package but the lower plenum has been modified aka machined to improve better performance. However, Tony from Motordyne tested it on 03-04 cars and they shows good gains as well.

MREV2: A more refined version of the MREV+ where there're extra machining done to the lower plenum. However, not offered as a package anymore. Just only the machined 03-04 lower plenum. This is being offered individual and not a package is because it's suitable for BOTH 03-04 motors and 05-06 motors. Whereas the 03-04 folks already have the spacer kit and just want to get the lower plenum done.


So you have an 05-06, you'd want to get the MREV2 AND the spacer kit if you want to squeeze more power out of it.

Someone please correct me if I'm wrong.
Thanks for answering my question, the most informative post I have read since joining the forum.
 
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2006 | 05:36 PM
  #55  
unfadable's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
From: Northern California
Ok. So I have a 06 Coupe AT (non-revup i presume). According to http://www.g35parts.com/9083/osc/pro...roducts_id=364 the MREV2 does work for non-revup engines. Can anyone verify this?? If indeed this is true, what is the probability of the car running lean with the 5/16" spacer? Finally will the ECU be able to adjust in time without upgrading to a new ECU? Thanks alot guys.
 
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 06:54 AM
  #56  
zebsl2's Avatar
cant wait to be blown!
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 33
Likes: 1
Talking AT LAST....but

Finally this was the thread I have been looking for. I have gathered that the MREV2 plus the 5/16 spacer is the way to go BUT what about the MREV2 and the crawford plenum? Does the crawford hinder the power of the rev-up motors, or will it have the same affect in-terms of power as the spacer?

Oh one more thing I was searching sites and came across the Skunk Works 5/8 spacer.... has anyone tested this this spacer with the MREV2?????

http://www.g35parts.com/9083/osc/pro...roducts_id=298
 

Last edited by zebsl2; Aug 1, 2006 at 07:26 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 12:01 PM
  #57  
Hydrazine's Avatar
Former G35driver Vendor
iTrader: (23)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,054
Likes: 85
From: Los Angeles California
Originally Posted by bb319675
Tony,

Can the ECU adapt enough with my breathing mods?

This is my daily car so I need it to last and be reliable.
Will the car run better if I use a UTEC with my breathing mods? (Stillen intake and exhaust, MREV2 + 5/16")

Thanks
You have several good mods but you can only know if you need a tune by getting a dyno with a A/F readout.

And no matter what it is, you can only improve performance with a UTEC. If you do indeed get a UTEC I will also suggest getting test pipes (if they are acceptable to you). The test pipes are the last good bolt on you can do.

And if you wrap it all up with a UTEC tune, you are as good as it can get without going nuts on internals, N2O or FI.

You are just about done with the NA mod sequence.
Tony
 
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 12:04 PM
  #58  
Hydrazine's Avatar
Former G35driver Vendor
iTrader: (23)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,054
Likes: 85
From: Los Angeles California
Originally Posted by unfadable
Ok. So I have a 06 Coupe AT (non-revup i presume). According to http://www.g35parts.com/9083/osc/pro...roducts_id=364 the MREV2 does work for non-revup engines. Can anyone verify this?? If indeed this is true, what is the probability of the car running lean with the 5/16" spacer? Finally will the ECU be able to adjust in time without upgrading to a new ECU? Thanks alot guys.
You can use the MREV2 no problem.

If you combine it with a spacer, the chance of running lean is approximatly ~1:5.

But you will have a better knowledge of where it will go if you already have a dyno.
 
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 12:09 PM
  #59  
Hydrazine's Avatar
Former G35driver Vendor
iTrader: (23)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,054
Likes: 85
From: Los Angeles California
Originally Posted by zebsl2
Finally this was the thread I have been looking for. I have gathered that the MREV2 plus the 5/16 spacer is the way to go BUT what about the MREV2 and the crawford plenum? Does the crawford hinder the power of the rev-up motors, or will it have the same affect in-terms of power as the spacer?

Oh one more thing I was searching sites and came across the Skunk Works 5/8 spacer.... has anyone tested this this spacer with the MREV2?????

http://www.g35parts.com/9083/osc/pro...roducts_id=298
Performance of the Crawford plenum will be very similar to the spacer. In fact, it is most similar to the 1/2" spacer in terms of performance.

For area under the curve though, I have found there is a optimum plenum volume achieved with the 5/16" spacer.

The 5/16" spacer doesn't make the highest peak power, but it makes the most area under the curve. In other words, it makes the highest "average" gain.

And this is why I recommend the 5/16" spacer with the MREV's. A higher average gain.
Tony
 
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 12:16 PM
  #60  
clokwork's Avatar
Cmon Son!
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,328
Likes: 0
From: NoVA
Thanks for all of those replies Tony. You are a great man and company to deal with.
 
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:12 AM.