Engine, Drivetrain & Forced-Induction Have Technical Questions or Done Modifications to the G35? Find out the answer in here! (View All Posts)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

300 hp NA V35??

Old Jan 20, 2010 | 04:02 PM
  #31  
4DGS's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (69)
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,524
Likes: 981
From: Ontario, Canada
Do you have an ongoing build thread?

I know BBS350z has his stripped Z that's going to be a track dedicated N/A car. He has a 500something hp street Z and a G sedan for DD. ****in guy lol

Check out his....unbuild on my350.

Do you plan on stripping the car? is it a G or a Z?
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2010 | 04:07 PM
  #32  
Jeff92se's Avatar
Red Card Crew
iTrader: (24)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 37,810
Likes: 585
From: ɐʍ 'ǝlʇʇɐǝs
Premier Member

I 300rwhp is one of those things that if you have to ask, you are going to have a pretty difficult time actually achieving it.
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2010 | 04:17 PM
  #33  
zackt69's Avatar
rarejdm.com
iTrader: (43)
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,140
Likes: 36
From: Pasadena, Ca
I have a G - it's completely gutted, seam welded, and a cage is in the works. I still daily it, but by the time it's a full dedicated track car I'll have something else to daily. I have a thread that shows some of the progress, but I'll probably start a build thread up when it's all finished.
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2010 | 04:21 PM
  #34  
4DGS's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (69)
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,524
Likes: 981
From: Ontario, Canada
Cool, can't wait to see it all!

Back to OPs question though ahah.
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2010 | 04:25 PM
  #35  
tragedycat's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,333
Likes: 7
Originally Posted by zackt69
I have a G - it's completely gutted, seam welded, and a cage is in the works. I still daily it, but by the time it's a full dedicated track car I'll have something else to daily. I have a thread that shows some of the progress, but I'll probably start a build thread up when it's all finished.
I find it amazing how people like you, ShanesG, etc. still use your cars to daily drive.
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2010 | 04:27 PM
  #36  
scareyourpassenger's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
This is a dynapack dyno. Yes they read higher but I don't care. The OP wanted to know about 300crank and our car does that. If HP was a standard then all dynos would probably read wrong!

Certain items are worth doing. In this case I am pointing out the easy hp is in an exhaust and a tune. I am not going to toss any more money for an extra 3hp.

FYI, all dynos are real unless you are talking about gtec meters I will stick to dynapack because it is the right type of dyno to tune on. I don't want to tune my car on a roller dyno to find that the load was enough to reproduce the limits of the car on the street.

Originally Posted by 4DGS
^what the hell kind of dyno is that? That thing is out to lunch! These cars DO NOT make 280hp stock. Get you car dyno'd on a real dyno and you'll see you're probably closer to 260.

Mustang; do we ever talk about crank power on here lol

Jotsuka; I like you based on your ability to search, high five.

AZt108;

OP; The best way to do this is going to be a Procharger, stillen stage 1 or 2. Basically just supercharge it. Turbos are nice but SC is a more reliable source of power and usually a cheaper install, not to mention most of the SC kits them self are cheaper to begin with.
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2010 | 04:31 PM
  #37  
4DGS's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (69)
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,524
Likes: 981
From: Ontario, Canada
He didn't ask about power at the crank. He asked about power. Power is the power to the wheels, people that calculate their power at the crank are guys in civics trying to hit 200hp.

No offense to anyone that might take it, but dynapacks are crap. Your reading is off.
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2010 | 04:33 PM
  #38  
Invalid_User's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (23)
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 9,738
Likes: 217
From: Tampa,Florida
Originally Posted by 4DGS
Zack, reason for not just going FI?
I would think going boosted you tend to run into more problems, having a built motor and staying NA trying to achieve 300whp you dont run into that many problems. It would be awesome to have a 300whp NA setup not having to wait for boost to build but to always have all that power when stepping on the gas pedal.
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2010 | 04:37 PM
  #39  
Invalid_User's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (23)
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 9,738
Likes: 217
From: Tampa,Florida
Here is the Florida G Club Presidents G35 coupe.

As you can see wasnt easy reaching this:






https://g35driver.com/forums/engine-...g35-coupe.html
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2010 | 04:48 PM
  #40  
dofu's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 10,822
Likes: 242
From: Silicon Valley
Originally Posted by GreenGoblin
I would say that dyno reads a tad high... lol you baselines 280 before the tune? Picking up 14hp in a tune is not impossible.
OK, I'd have to say that up to 20hp gains from a tune is very possible if you have the right bolt-ons or mods to go with it. but that dyno does seem more than a bit high...
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2010 | 06:11 PM
  #41  
STCLAIRWEST's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (14)
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 24
From: TORONTO
4DGS That Z is from a shop call SG motorsports ive read the thread about it over on my350z and im sure there is a dyno sheet too.
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2010 | 07:12 PM
  #42  
scareyourpassenger's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Would you like to explain why dynapacks are crap? I would like to hear why you think this.

Originally Posted by 4DGS
He didn't ask about power at the crank. He asked about power. Power is the power to the wheels, people that calculate their power at the crank are guys in civics trying to hit 200hp.

No offense to anyone that might take it, but dynapacks are crap. Your reading is off.
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2010 | 08:54 PM
  #43  
hyunkoon's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
^^^
I want to know it too.

Wouldn't reading directly from the hubs be better than reading from the tires?
 

Last edited by hyunkoon; Jan 20, 2010 at 08:58 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2010 | 10:57 PM
  #44  
4DGS's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (69)
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,524
Likes: 981
From: Ontario, Canada
I trust a roller dyno, majority of cars dyno'd are done on them. Dynapacks have been proven to be off in the past.

That's just my opinion, not really to say they are a lesser quality. If you want to get high reads, dynapack ftw. If you want a legit reading of what your car is actually putting to the ground. You need something on rollers.

Hyunkoon; you would think that, but it really doesn't matter how fast the hub spins, it's how fast the wheels turn on a surface.

Again IMHO
 
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2010 | 12:12 AM
  #45  
Tollboothwilley's Avatar
Former G35driver Vendor
iTrader: (32)
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,684
Likes: 28
From: Vegas
Originally Posted by 4DGS
He didn't ask about power at the crank. He asked about power. Power is the power to the wheels, people that calculate their power at the crank are guys in civics trying to hit 200hp.

No offense to anyone that might take it, but dynapacks are crap. Your reading is off.

No offense, but you're an idiot when it comes to knowledge about dyno's then.

EVERY DYNO can bet set to show you big numbers. Dynopacks can bet set to show you low numbers.

When it comes to tuning the majority of good tuners will use a dynopack or mustang dyno. There is a reason it is 4x more expensive than the dynojet.

We all know that Church's dyno reads high but he does a great job tuning. That is the important thing. That is what a dynopack will allow.
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:43 AM.