Motordyne Spacer dyno test results
#22
Originally Posted by Randys_G
Steve, I don't know if that is true. So when you added the Z-tube, you didn't notice a dif? That's only about 5-7 ponies.
Anyway, a mod that adds power throughout most of the RPM range is a welcome addition.
#25
#28
Originally Posted by THX723
Dizz,
It's up to you ... send it if you'd like (it was already cut-off when you sent it to me).
As for the dyno run, yes you wouldn't have made more power past peak but you'd still be insterested to see how your engine behaves all the way to just shy of fuel cut (@ 6600rpm).
It's up to you ... send it if you'd like (it was already cut-off when you sent it to me).
As for the dyno run, yes you wouldn't have made more power past peak but you'd still be insterested to see how your engine behaves all the way to just shy of fuel cut (@ 6600rpm).
I don't know man, revving that high kinda freaks me out.
#29
#30
G Kreuzer
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,812
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I agree and that's because there is no appreciable power gain (if any at all) from the Z-tube. If you're feeling is "I think I feel something" ... then chances are ... there's NOTHING. In the case of the plenum or spacer ... the sensation is readily apparent (for me at least w. the Kinetix plenum). There was no doubt there was a power gain. Dyno results later verified such. I can't say this is true for the others, but can only assume the same for the spacer people. If you can at least believe that plenums work, then there's absolutely no reason why a spacer wouldn't achieve the same result.
Here's the missing page from Dizz ....
Here's the missing page from Dizz ....
Last edited by THX723; 02-21-2005 at 08:53 PM.