Forced Induction Discussion of turbos , superchargers , and nitrous upgrades on the G35

Vortech 500 CluB :)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #31  
Old 06-01-2009 | 02:43 PM
G37Rider92649's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (38)
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,605
Likes: 37
From: SoCal...OC..714..
Its not that you post fake stuff, its you dont know.

In general, props to you for your investment, enjoy your new set up and be safe.

Everything looks good, but best tuner in the world my azzzz lol just dont get me started lol and we drive gz not toyota, who cares about supras here.

nice #s tho, but yeah take it on a different dyno and see what sup, maybe even another dyno-dynamics for comparison.
 
  #32  
Old 06-02-2009 | 12:06 AM
Mr_pharmD's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (77)
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,058
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by G37Rider92649
Its not that you post fake stuff, its you dont know.

In general, props to you for your investment, enjoy your new set up and be safe.

Everything looks good, but best tuner in the world my azzzz lol just dont get me started lol and we drive gz not toyota, who cares about supras here.

nice #s tho, but yeah take it on a different dyno and see what sup, maybe even another dyno-dynamics for comparison.
U really do have issues every time u post. Nenni is one the best and tunes worldwide on any car. I'm sure u heard of Boost logic and they have 1 of the fastest supra which was tuned by Justin Nenni himself. So if u don't know what u are talking about just keep your negative comments to ure self bc most of the advice u give on this forum are crap. As for scaling the intervals incorrectly will NOT alter whp/tq. Keep ure jealously on g37 forum where your BS belongs.
 
  #33  
Old 06-02-2009 | 12:22 AM
GT-ER's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,901
Likes: 2
From: Puerto Rico
Originally Posted by Mr_pharmD
As for scaling the intervals incorrectly will NOT alter whp/tq. Keep ure jealously on g37 forum where your BS belongs.
You are correct that the scaling won't affect the numbers, inproper readings are the dyno pickup will. I read your topic on my350z where you stated "The dyno tach reading was off bc we couldnt get a good connection source but on the VPRO it was tuned to 7000 rpm". This is a HUGE problem because if the dyno cannot read the rpms correct than the numbers are null. The ONLY way a load bearing dyno can calucate proper hp/torque is with the rpm pickup reading correctly.

No hate from me since I want to build a SC setup myself, but I honestly think you should dyno it again an make sure the rpm pickup is correctly clipped on.
 
  #34  
Old 06-02-2009 | 11:12 PM
Mr_pharmD's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (77)
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,058
Likes: 0
Just to clarify they weren't able to get a good tach reading so they ended up doing horse pw to weight ratio instead.

Also, if u look at the old threads of ppl with 2.87 pulleys and SC trim, it shows that they are making 400whp on a DD on average. Then u have str8dum1 who is making 450whp with the 2.87 + s trim on DD BUT when I make 480whp with 2.87 pulley + T trim on DD, my numbers look wierd??? U guys do the math I have a BIGGER blower and my numbers dont look inflat at all. In my opinion I should have gotten more whp with a built motor, cams and a 3.65L motor.

Originally Posted by GT-ER
You are correct that the scaling won't affect the numbers, inproper readings are the dyno pickup will. I read your topic on my350z where you stated "The dyno tach reading was off bc we couldnt get a good connection source but on the VPRO it was tuned to 7000 rpm". This is a HUGE problem because if the dyno cannot read the rpms correct than the numbers are null. The ONLY way a load bearing dyno can calucate proper hp/torque is with the rpm pickup reading correctly.

No hate from me since I want to build a SC setup myself, but I honestly think you should dyno it again an make sure the rpm pickup is correctly clipped on.
 

Last edited by Mr_pharmD; 06-02-2009 at 11:20 PM.
  #35  
Old 06-02-2009 | 11:32 PM
seung012's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 3
From: Maryland
Congrats!
 
  #36  
Old 06-02-2009 | 11:45 PM
GT-ER's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,901
Likes: 2
From: Puerto Rico
Originally Posted by Mr_pharmD
Just to clarify they weren't able to get a good tach reading so they ended up doing horse pw to weight ratio instead.

Also, if u look at the old threads of ppl with 2.87 pulleys and SC trim, it shows that they are making 400whp on a DD on average. Then u have str8dum1 who is making 450whp with the 2.87 + s trim on DD BUT when I make 480whp with 2.87 pulley + T trim on DD, my numbers look wierd??? U guys do the math I have a BIGGER blower and my numbers dont look inflat at all. In my opinion I should have gotten more whp with a built motor, cams and a 3.65L motor.
I'm not disagreeing with you...I'm just pointing out that there is a problem with that dyno sheet. I don't doubt that your car is capable of 500whp...but **I** personally would either hit another dyno or try that one again and make sure they put the rpm pickup correctly.
 
  #37  
Old 06-03-2009 | 05:31 PM
GTM's Avatar
GTM
Former G35driver Vendor
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
From: California
Great numbers bud! Congrats on getting your car wrapped up and back on the road again it must be a blast.

If you have a chance I would love to see a Dynojet graph, if those are uncorrected DynoDynamic numbers this car should be around 560-570rwhp on a Dynojet. You would be the record holder!

You can always come down to SoCal for a pull

-George
GT Motorsports
 
  #38  
Old 06-04-2009 | 01:24 AM
str8dum1's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,241
Likes: 5
From: raleigh-wood NC
ya my best was 460 on a DD, so that 480 looks reasonable. That 520 one is some solid gains for just bumping the timing.
 
  #39  
Old 06-04-2009 | 12:56 PM
jouvert00's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (17)
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 215
Likes: 1
From: Maryland
Good gains, might actually be the vortech record holder.
Anyone knows what happen to senrty, hadn't seen him post in a while?
 

Last edited by jouvert00; 06-04-2009 at 03:59 PM.
  #40  
Old 06-04-2009 | 12:57 PM
rookie's Avatar
Former G35driver Vendor
iTrader: (19)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,420
Likes: 5
From: OC
Premier Member
I think sentry blew his stock bottom end or something.
 
  #41  
Old 06-04-2009 | 02:18 PM
G U LATER's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,062
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
that will do it
 
  #42  
Old 06-04-2009 | 04:00 PM
str8dum1's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,241
Likes: 5
From: raleigh-wood NC
sentry was on a dynojet. I'm way passed Sentry's hp and PharmD is way past mine. he's easily the highest on the forums.
 
  #43  
Old 06-07-2009 | 10:01 PM
Triple8Sol's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (151)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,288
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
Nice! Great to see Vortech S/C's safely surpassing the 500 mark.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
seagrasser
G35 Cars
17
05-03-2022 09:43 AM
ZoominG35
Audio/Video/Electronics
2
10-12-2015 04:53 PM
carsmacked71
New Members Check In
3
09-18-2015 04:13 AM
dorifto7
New Members Check In
1
09-17-2015 04:53 AM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Vortech 500 CluB :)



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:55 PM.