Forced Induction Discussion of turbos , superchargers , and nitrous upgrades on the G35

what kind of engine management should i get??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Aug 23, 2009 | 03:26 PM
  #16  
XKR's Avatar
XKR
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 786
Likes: 8
From: Sugar Land TX/Boca Raton FL/Carefree AZ
F-CON !!!!!
 
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2009 | 05:19 PM
  #17  
rcdash's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 32
From: NC
ANY knowledgable tuner can tune a Haltech. Even one that has never tuned one before - it's software interface is that intuitive. There are numerous builds on this site and on my350z running the Haltech. The support thread has more details, located here: http://my350z.com/forum/product-anno...tandalone.html

To my knowledge, it is the only EMS that interfaces with the car's native CAN communication to allow interaction with stock equipment (such as wheel speed sensors for traction control).
 

Last edited by rcdash; Aug 23, 2009 at 05:24 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2009 | 06:31 PM
  #18  
2006tt guy's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
thanks for the feedback everyone, i should be more specific when i start my thread. there was a question as to what kind of system i should use. i am familiar with what is out there I'm just not sure exactly how much tuning freedom i should allow. i'm looking to get 650-700whp safely. i'm currently at 510whp at 8psi.
 
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2009 | 06:35 PM
  #19  
Chef-j's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
From: Mi/Tx/Ny/s.korea
Originally Posted by 2006tt guy
thanks for the feedback everyone, i should be more specific when i start my thread. there was a question as to what kind of system i should use. i am familiar with what is out there I'm just not sure exactly how much tuning freedom i should allow. i'm looking to get 650-700whp safely. i'm currently at 510whp at 8psi.
510whp at 8psi?
 
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2009 | 08:18 PM
  #20  
2006tt guy's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
for my setup 510whp is made at 8psi..
 
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2009 | 09:04 PM
  #21  
TTG35forT's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 419
Likes: 3
From: Florida
Given your HP goal, I would recommend the F-CON, Haltech or ViPec V88.

If you go with F-Con, you are limited to using an authrized HKS dealer for tunering... If you don't have an authorized HKS dealer near you, you might want to stick with the Haltech or ViPec. Check out their web sites and compare their respective features.
 
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2009 | 09:51 PM
  #22  
rcdash's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 32
From: NC
Originally Posted by 2006tt guy
for my setup 510whp is made at 8psi..

You previously posted that you made low to mid 400s at 8 and 10 psi. Hmmmm...


Originally Posted by 2006tt guy
20k since install, dyno 8/10/09 @ 10psi hit 465 whp.
Originally Posted by 2006tt guy
i have the jwt twin turbo kit. upgraded bb700 gt28 turbos, ported head, pauter rods. arias 8;5;1 low compression pistons, nismo gasket, upgraded fuel, and oil pump. twin intercoolers. jwt cams 262 duration,jwt valve springs and 550cc injectors.


Originally Posted by 2006tt guy
relentless auto is a good contact to have for tuner work. they are in el cajon
 
Attached Thumbnails what kind of engine management should i get??-pict0443.jpg  

Last edited by rcdash; Aug 23, 2009 at 10:03 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2009 | 12:56 PM
  #23  
str8dum1's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,241
Likes: 5
From: raleigh-wood NC
haha, own3d! going from 465 to 700 is a huge jump. Good luck! You need more than a ECU to do that
 
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2009 | 01:20 PM
  #24  
rimshot's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (11)
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 661
Likes: 2
From: Maryland
Vipec v88 is what's being used on my build.
 
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2009 | 04:23 PM
  #25  
2006tt guy's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
clarity- rcdash called me on my dyno info so i'd like to provide some insight to the jump in power. it's not magical, the guys at the tuner shop i went to had a higher rate of load for my car. they said this is normal for them since they tune drift and track cars. my car was also running fairly lean at the time which led my session to be cut short as to spare the pain of a blown motor. i will get my new sheet up to make my point more clearly. you guys offer a lot of help and it is appreciated.
 
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2009 | 05:45 PM
  #26  
rcdash's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 32
From: NC
Originally Posted by 2006tt guy
clarity- rcdash called me on my dyno info so i'd like to provide some insight to the jump in power. it's not magical, the guys at the tuner shop i went to had a higher rate of load for my car. they said this is normal for them since they tune drift and track cars. my car was also running fairly lean at the time which led my session to be cut short as to spare the pain of a blown motor. i will get my new sheet up to make my point more clearly. you guys offer a lot of help and it is appreciated.
For comparison's sake (across different dynos), a SAE or STD corrected dynojet is well accepted. Dynapacks are notorious for inflating numbers (e.g. the JWT dyno). The fact that your tuner shop tweaked a setting on the dyno to increase the power output displayed is telling you something. It's not magical, but it is made up and completely irrelevant whp # for comparison to other cars. A JWT 700bb kit and low compression 3.5L motor will see around 350-380 whp on a Dynojet at 8 psi. With your cams, maybe a little higher whp, but not much more torque.
 
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2009 | 07:52 PM
  #27  
2006tt guy's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
that's correct, i did my last run and normalized the data to get an accurate comparison between having loaded sprung weight on the vehicle and un-sprung weight. so a 20% loaded system vs. almost no load. that's how the power was measured in the runs.as you well know we do not exist in an environment where there are no frictional and rotating mass losses, however just for numbers sake that hp can be shown with 10psi.
 
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2009 | 09:15 PM
  #28  
rcdash's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 32
From: NC
Originally Posted by 2006tt guy
that's correct, i did my last run and normalized the data to get an accurate comparison between having loaded sprung weight on the vehicle and un-sprung weight. so a 20% loaded system vs. almost no load. that's how the power was measured in the runs.as you well know we do not exist in an environment where there are no frictional and rotating mass losses, however just for numbers sake that hp can be shown with 10psi.
The numbers are not comparable unless they have been cross-checked on a Dynojet (or the dyno has several data points comparing cars run on both). Mathematical corrections are guesses and bogus as a point of comparison. Dynojet STD and SAE numbers have fixed atmospheric correction factors and are the most reproducable/repeatable across different dynos.

There's nothing terribly real world about any dyno #. It's just a # that approximates engine output as measured at the wheels, hubs, etc. You can compare #s across different runs on the same dyno. That's it - and that's fine for tuning. If you want to compare your dyno # to someone else's car measured at some other dyno, get a Dynojet reading. Hope that makes it clear.
 
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2009 | 11:14 PM
  #29  
2006tt guy's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
that makes sense. i wanted to see what other factors can positively or negatively affect my power output. that's what i was looking for when i had the load changed on the hub. it decreased from 20% down to 12%. hence the big power change. but back to the topic of the thread. how is the haltech setup working??
 
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2009 | 05:50 PM
  #30  
bigkrnxboi's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 373
Likes: 1
From: Torrance
Fcon vpro <3
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
privatecorye
Steering & Suspension
1
May 31, 2016 01:56 AM
ClwMike
G35 Sedan V35 2003-06
7
Jul 23, 2015 12:55 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:00 AM.