G35 Coupe V35 2003 - 07 Discussion about the 1st Generation V35 G35 Coupe

Dyno'd my car today...I'm happy!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Dec 8, 2009 | 09:19 PM
  #1  
GT-ER's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,901
Likes: 2
From: Puerto Rico
Dyno'd my car today...I'm happy!

I took my coupe for the first time to my local dyno. I put down 240whp with 219lb-ft of torque. My only mods are test pipes, Skunk2 Spacer, K&N Drop-in and the stock resonator was swapped out for a magnaflow one. That's it.

My previous Sedan had headers, testpipes, skunk2 spacer, K&N Drop-in, And a custom mandrel bent 2.5"exhaust and it put out 242whp on this same dyno in near identical conditions. Interesting.



Oh...and I did 3 runs and two were 239whp and the last 240whp...how's that for consistency? LOL.
 
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2009 | 11:09 PM
  #2  
fresh_06'G35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
From: Southern California (760)
consistency is key haha good numbers
 
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2009 | 01:20 AM
  #3  
EGGPLANT's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,818
Likes: 13
From: SoCal - LA
damn i would have expected more....

my car threw 256 with injen CAI, XO2 exhaust, Skunk2 5/8 spacer.... tuned by technosquare... non rev up btw...

but happy modding... hope you get more HP with future mods..
 
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2009 | 02:27 AM
  #4  
partyman66's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,560
Likes: 228
From: Southeastern Mass.
Originally Posted by bluevelvet
damn i would have expected more....
Keep in mind that his car is an auto-tranny so it's going to lose more power in delivery to the wheels than the same year 6MT.
 
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2009 | 03:00 AM
  #5  
JOKER's Avatar
CLUB MODERATOR
iTrader: (24)
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 9,084
Likes: 348
From: earth
I dynoed at 242hp with spacer and intake only.
 
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2009 | 03:15 AM
  #6  
jlo0109's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,514
Likes: 0
From: ::626::714::818::
I'm sorry but that number is pretty sad, stock I think is at 236 to the wheels, don't know about AT but shouldn't be too far off.
 
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2009 | 03:52 AM
  #7  
JOKER's Avatar
CLUB MODERATOR
iTrader: (24)
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 9,084
Likes: 348
From: earth
^mine is AT
 
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2009 | 04:30 AM
  #8  
Skaterbasist's Avatar
Retired SuperMod
Staff Alumni
iTrader: (16)
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 13,068
Likes: 101
From: Southern Cali --> 818
Originally Posted by jlo0109
I'm sorry but that number is pretty sad, stock I think is at 236 to the wheels, don't know about AT but shouldn't be too far off.
There's nothing sad about those numbers Jason. My car put down 265-ish bone-stock. That doesn't mean it [was] faster than any other stock revup. Different dyno's yield different results, that's all.
 
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2009 | 07:20 AM
  #9  
GT-ER's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,901
Likes: 2
From: Puerto Rico
Most of you people are comparing it to 6mt's which will put a good amount more power due to less drivetrain loss.

FWIW, the sedan I used to own put down 206whp stock. So I'm most definitely happy with 240whp.
 
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2009 | 07:23 AM
  #10  
GT-ER's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,901
Likes: 2
From: Puerto Rico
Originally Posted by bluevelvet
damn i would have expected more....

my car threw 256 with injen CAI, XO2 exhaust, Skunk2 5/8 spacer.... tuned by technosquare... non rev up btw...

but happy modding... hope you get more HP with future mods..
Your car put 16whp more with a tune, exhaust, cai...all of which I don't have. Of course you're going to get more hp than me...you also spent 3 times what I did.

Originally Posted by jlo0109
I'm sorry but that number is pretty sad, stock I think is at 236 to the wheels, don't know about AT but shouldn't be too far off.
That would be about 220whp on a 5AT.
 

Last edited by GT-ER; Dec 9, 2009 at 11:53 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2009 | 11:29 AM
  #11  
LightsOut's Avatar
SIETESG
iTrader: (37)
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 6,784
Likes: 6
From: So. Cal (323)-(909)
Premier Member

get rid of the skunk spacer and get a motordyne spacer and you yield better results
 
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2009 | 11:51 AM
  #12  
GT-ER's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,901
Likes: 2
From: Puerto Rico
Originally Posted by LightsOut
get rid of the skunk spacer and get a motordyne spacer and you yield better results
Do you think it would be enough to offset what I'd have to pay?
 
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2009 | 12:19 PM
  #13  
LightsOut's Avatar
SIETESG
iTrader: (37)
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 6,784
Likes: 6
From: So. Cal (323)-(909)
Premier Member

spacer can be picked up cheap used or 200 new, then sell your skunk spacer.
 
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2009 | 12:25 PM
  #14  
GT-ER's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,901
Likes: 2
From: Puerto Rico
Originally Posted by LightsOut
spacer can be picked up cheap used or 200 new, then sell your skunk spacer.
How much more could it possibly give me though? I just have a tough time believing that a small difference in spacer thickness will make a noticeable difference in power.
 
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2009 | 12:43 PM
  #15  
LightsOut's Avatar
SIETESG
iTrader: (37)
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 6,784
Likes: 6
From: So. Cal (323)-(909)
Premier Member

https://g35driver.com/forums/reviews...spacers-4.html

there is another thread that show dyno graph and the MD had a higer gains. think its in the 350z forum.
 
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:18 PM.