StrafeSpeed IGT rear bumper interest thread
#16
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,922
Likes: 12
From: Belcamp, MD
I'm not understanding what you are saying or asking? Are you saying show the picture of the selected IGT bumper design to the OP in this thread? I guess that makes sense.
#20
It's pretty sick thopugh i think it looks way to similar to the CS rear to justify making it.
Also whats with everyone and being vent happy lately, christ sake people calm down with the vents....
I'd recommend making a non-widebody APR rear, to me it give the OEM feel with a nice smooth line and diffuser and without all the fins and vents. Much Cleaner!!!
Also whats with everyone and being vent happy lately, christ sake people calm down with the vents....
I'd recommend making a non-widebody APR rear, to me it give the OEM feel with a nice smooth line and diffuser and without all the fins and vents. Much Cleaner!!!
#21
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,922
Likes: 12
From: Belcamp, MD
I'm certain the Chargespeed/OEM lines are pretty close to each other, it is just the fact that the aftermarket bumpers are lower which gives the perceived droop. The shortness and inward angle of the OEM bumper is what makes it look less droopy if thats what you are getting at.
#24
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,922
Likes: 12
From: Belcamp, MD
I also know what you're saying about the similarity of the two, I thought about that too, but the differences are enough for me to want one over the other (i.e. Kenstyle vs K2).
#25
^lol nice, check my post look kinda what a non-wide apr would look like...mmmm
And please for the sake of humanity no k-style rear, we need more sleek/clean mods not loud ones!!!
And please for the sake of humanity no k-style rear, we need more sleek/clean mods not loud ones!!!
#27
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,922
Likes: 12
From: Belcamp, MD
You can do the same design to a CS rear, which has less lines in it actually. The KS has that higher bumpout by the fender which I've never been a fan of.