Fastest G35?
#61
12-22-2004, 04:32 PM
#62
12-22-2004, 04:59 PM
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DFWG35
So I get to pick the car right.... Since you are selecting someone else’s car I get to do the same... Right... I have posted on my web site what my car specs / times are; this would be my Proof.... Do you see how pointless your offer is…
As I said before.. Post the proof..
Out of curiosity what law firm are you going to work for? PM me if you like..
As I said before.. Post the proof..
Out of curiosity what law firm are you going to work for? PM me if you like..
I will be working for the local (Lubbock) Chapter 7 Bankruptcy trustee until I move to Dallas in May...
Oh and Laura, I am from San Antonio and my brother still is a firefighter there so I am in the Austin/SA area alot... we will def. bring the car down sometime!
Last edited by TxLawDawg; 12-22-2004 at 05:02 PM.
Hope you understand... but yeah thats where the car is most of the time when Kenny isn't driving it...
#66
12-22-2004, 06:21 PM
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#67
12-22-2004, 08:39 PM
#68
12-23-2004, 07:45 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: omaha,ne
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Randys_G
I never claimed to be the fastest, but you'd know that if you read my original post. And as for today's standard, for a 3500 pound car, low 13's on street tires is respectable, I don't care who you are.
Don't take anything personally. I know you didn't claim to be the fastest. I simply didn't remember anyone posting faster times so I was asking. I forgot about booger posting his high 12s. He's even in the same town as I am. (By the way booger, did you proove that time. These guys will be asking.
) Sounds like you two guys are possibly the fastest of members on this forum.As far as 13s being respectable; I believe I made that very statement in a previous post. 13s is very respectable. However, it is not necessarily impressive. It may be impressive for the G, but, again, by today's standards it is really not that great. There are full bodied older muscle cars tipping the scale anywhere from 3200-4200lbs that run 12s, 11s, and even some 10s at that weight. Then again, they don't run a V6.
My $.02 was not meant to bash or disrespect anyone on this forum. I was simply trying to make a few people understand that what TaxLawDawg is claiming is very possible - NO MATTER IF IT'S TRUE OR NOT. At first, some people seemed to think that it was not possible. Now, the arguement has changed into "you're full of **** until you prove different."
#69
12-23-2004, 07:53 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: omaha,ne
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sinurgy
So why then would you even bother posting it?
As far as why I posted on here that it does indeed run 11s and could very easily run 10s, I was trying to make a simple point. But, if you don't get it, then you don't get it. Sorry for wasting my time and yours.
You guys need to be a little more objective when discussing the performance potential of cars. I will say it again. There is always someone smarter than you and better than you, so you will never have the fastest car. (Unless of course you're the one who's the smartest and have the fastest car - someone has to be fastest.
)
#72
12-23-2004, 12:39 PM
Originally Posted by omahaG
The reason it's in my sig is because I thought this was a group of people who appreciated cars, style, and performance. If anyone wants to call it BS because I didn't post dyno results or a timeslip, then I have 3 options. 1. take it off my sig. 2. post the proof. 3. say screw you.
As far as why I posted on here that it does indeed run 11s and could very easily run 10s, I was trying to make a simple point. But, if you don't get it, then you don't get it. Sorry for wasting my time and yours.
You guys need to be a little more objective when discussing the performance potential of cars. I will say it again. There is always someone smarter than you and better than you, so you will never have the fastest car. (Unless of course you're the one who's the smartest and have the fastest car - someone has to be fastest. )
As far as why I posted on here that it does indeed run 11s and could very easily run 10s, I was trying to make a simple point. But, if you don't get it, then you don't get it. Sorry for wasting my time and yours.
You guys need to be a little more objective when discussing the performance potential of cars. I will say it again. There is always someone smarter than you and better than you, so you will never have the fastest car. (Unless of course you're the one who's the smartest and have the fastest car - someone has to be fastest.
)nice way to sum it up!! So your looking for a low 13 sec car, i'll race you in my M3
JKJK
#75
01-19-2005, 04:50 PM
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[QUOTE=TxLawDawg] and raping modded Supras on Northwest Highway... on Nittos the car has run WELL into the 11's...
hahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!! ok.... i can name at least 20 supras in texas alone who will tear it up. bring it to az and it's all over for him.... talk talk talk. it hasn't even been done yet. supras don't have to prove it, they've been running low 11s since '94
hahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!! ok.... i can name at least 20 supras in texas alone who will tear it up. bring it to az and it's all over for him.... talk talk talk. it hasn't even been done yet. supras don't have to prove it, they've been running low 11s since '94