Making the G35 into an exotic
Your so against kits cars, did you know your cars company was built on selling them?
http://i56.tinypic.com/4v1d83.jpg
http://i52.tinypic.com/35n58c0.jpg
I think from an engineering standpoint you have an interesting idea, just like a kit car, but the problem is the amount of money needed to change the G into an exotic, plus being ridiculed at car shows is not worth it. I don't think it is a good idea to post replica lambos to show how "great" they look.. think about it, once these replica lambos get their *** handed to them by simple turbo civics or srt4s, you will be the laughing stock of your town.
Im not sure which one you mean, relink the picture if you like
For a "generic" design, my car gets an awful lot of compliments.
And this is exactly how the conversation would go:
-"Dude...that's a nice Murcielago."
"Thanks."
-"Is it fast?"
"Well, yeah."
-"Can I see the engine?"
"Erm...I don't think so."
-"Well why not? Come on, let me look."
-"Wait...why are there only four cylinders?"
-"Dude...what kind of joke is this?"
Seriously. Trying to make your car something it's not is just stupid...
And this is exactly how the conversation would go:
-"Dude...that's a nice Murcielago."
"Thanks."
-"Is it fast?"
"Well, yeah."
-"Can I see the engine?"
"Erm...I don't think so."
-"Well why not? Come on, let me look."
-"Wait...why are there only four cylinders?"
-"Dude...what kind of joke is this?"
Seriously. Trying to make your car something it's not is just stupid...
-"Dude...that's a nice Murcielago."
"Thanks, its a kit car"
-"Dude...what kind of joke is this?"
I like the design unlike the mass produced bloated coupe you arrived in

this crap

this is not
Last edited by Arashi; Aug 21, 2012 at 06:55 AM.
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 10,359
Likes: 1,939
From: Auckland, New Zealand
good job comparing a car that looks very similar to the SLC.
how about a comparison with your crappy designs?
trololololo. i can draw a better car pissing on snow.
how about a comparison with your crappy designs?
trololololo. i can draw a better car pissing on snow.
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 10,359
Likes: 1,939
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Maybe you can convince the guys at Honda-tech with all of your retarded BS, but us here at this forum would not drive an Aston Martin G35. Try the civic guys, maybe you can convince them that they should put a Lambo kit on their car using paper mache. But I'm already registered at Honda-Tech so expect to be trolled there by yours truly as well.
trolololololo.
OP, it was a horrible idea to post that first picture of the Aston w/G grills slapped on. that turned everyone off, no one's against making the car your own. the issue is going out expressly to copy something else, now just making the car look more exotic is fine and has been done w/some success in the past on here. i understand why you're getting defensive considering the reaction you got but now you're just spouting nonsense. let's just get back on topic here, focusing on "more exotic" vs. "more like an existing exotic" would be a good start
My idea of a kit car would be the Factory 5 GTM, something that not only looks good but also earns the title of a "supercar".
This guy is just a giant troll guys.... Hes already trolled Beyond and 300zx forums...
http://forums.beyond.ca/st2/making-m...=&pagenumber=1

http://forums.beyond.ca/st2/making-m...=&pagenumber=1

Guest
Posts: n/a
I think you have some talent:

But the designs don't flow together. I think you'd really be better off just making up some simply bumpers to fit on cars and make things more subtle for them. You'd probably do awesome at making another Kuruma Z type bumper for the G... but not plastering the front with a futuristic design.

But the designs don't flow together. I think you'd really be better off just making up some simply bumpers to fit on cars and make things more subtle for them. You'd probably do awesome at making another Kuruma Z type bumper for the G... but not plastering the front with a futuristic design.
I don't follow your reasoning. At all. Unless you're planning on making an exotic that looks like it's from 1970 to make up for it being slow.
Last edited by Mr. Brett; Aug 21, 2012 at 01:18 PM.
Honestly when it comes to doing this kind of custom work, people come into the shop I work with, with hopes and dreams. Then we tell them what the cost will be to do what they want. The usually walk away and we never really see them again. To make the G look like an "exotic" your looking at a LOT of labor. Hundreds of hours of labor on it. Stretching the doors is not just something that you can easily throw around and do. To stretch a door say the G you have to move the B pillar out that means change the bracing in the car. This alone is a lot. You can drop 40k on body work. In the end you should have just saved up and bought a used Ferrari or Aston martin.
Honestly, the G looks fine the way it is. Why mess with the design?
It's unique. That's one thing I think Nissan has always had going for them: while Lexus, BMW, M.Benz and all those other mid-level car companies are trying to copy each other, Infinti has managed to retain its own unique profile and design. Give me one other car on the road that even remotely resembles the G35 coupe that was designed before it was.
It's unique. That's one thing I think Nissan has always had going for them: while Lexus, BMW, M.Benz and all those other mid-level car companies are trying to copy each other, Infinti has managed to retain its own unique profile and design. Give me one other car on the road that even remotely resembles the G35 coupe that was designed before it was.
@Mr_Brett: the 350Z....trololololololol
Why would you spend 18k on a car, and then another 30-50k on body work to make a car that LOOKS like something else when you can just spend that amount on a pre-owned version of what you're transforming your car into? Unless you're a body guy and just like doing it, it doesn't make sense for ANYONE involved.
Also, why would I want my car to look like an exotic? It's not an exotic. My assumption is that you'd know that the car you're about to buy is not an exotic car BEFORE you buy it. If you DON'T know that, then yeah, I guess it makes sense to go all goofy on changing it. Like, if you buy it, get it home, look up exotic on teh interwebz and be like "OH SCHNAP!!!!! MY CAR IS A LUXURY COUPE!!!!! NOT AN EXOTIC? DAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAMN!!!!!!" So, yeah, if that happens, then do up an exotic kit.
Based on that 300ZX, I'd agree with the point made about you making body kits. Just don't make gay ones.
Why would you spend 18k on a car, and then another 30-50k on body work to make a car that LOOKS like something else when you can just spend that amount on a pre-owned version of what you're transforming your car into? Unless you're a body guy and just like doing it, it doesn't make sense for ANYONE involved.
Also, why would I want my car to look like an exotic? It's not an exotic. My assumption is that you'd know that the car you're about to buy is not an exotic car BEFORE you buy it. If you DON'T know that, then yeah, I guess it makes sense to go all goofy on changing it. Like, if you buy it, get it home, look up exotic on teh interwebz and be like "OH SCHNAP!!!!! MY CAR IS A LUXURY COUPE!!!!! NOT AN EXOTIC? DAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAMN!!!!!!" So, yeah, if that happens, then do up an exotic kit.
Based on that 300ZX, I'd agree with the point made about you making body kits. Just don't make gay ones.
Last edited by driftsucky; Aug 21, 2012 at 06:32 PM.
@Mr_Brett: the 350Z....trololololololol
Why would you spend 18k on a car, and then another 30-50k on body work to make a car that LOOKS like something else when you can just spend that amount on a pre-owned version of what you're transforming your car into? Unless you're a body guy and just like doing it, it doesn't make sense for ANYONE involved.
Find me a car under 200k that kinda looks like this

Also, why would I want my car to look like an exotic? It's not an exotic. My assumption is that you'd know that the car you're about to buy is not an exotic car BEFORE you buy it. If you DON'T know that, then yeah, I guess it makes sense to go all goofy on changing it. Like, if you buy it, get it home, look up exotic on teh interwebz and be like "OH SCHNAP!!!!! MY CAR IS A LUXURY COUPE!!!!! NOT AN EXOTIC? DAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAMN!!!!!!" So, yeah, if that happens, then do up an exotic kit.
Based on that 300ZX, I'd agree with the point made about you making body kits. Just don't make gay ones.
Why would you spend 18k on a car, and then another 30-50k on body work to make a car that LOOKS like something else when you can just spend that amount on a pre-owned version of what you're transforming your car into? Unless you're a body guy and just like doing it, it doesn't make sense for ANYONE involved.
Find me a car under 200k that kinda looks like this

Also, why would I want my car to look like an exotic? It's not an exotic. My assumption is that you'd know that the car you're about to buy is not an exotic car BEFORE you buy it. If you DON'T know that, then yeah, I guess it makes sense to go all goofy on changing it. Like, if you buy it, get it home, look up exotic on teh interwebz and be like "OH SCHNAP!!!!! MY CAR IS A LUXURY COUPE!!!!! NOT AN EXOTIC? DAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAMN!!!!!!" So, yeah, if that happens, then do up an exotic kit.
Based on that 300ZX, I'd agree with the point made about you making body kits. Just don't make gay ones.

https://i.imgur.com/2mR0q.jpg
Can I buy Suzuki automobiles and kit Ferrari 599 bodies on them and still be legit, I dont think so.
the issue is going out expressly to copy something else, now just making the car look more exotic is fine and has been done w/some success in the past on here. i understand why you're getting defensive considering the reaction you got but now you're just spouting nonsense. let's just get back on topic here, focusing on "more exotic" vs. "more like an existing exotic" would be a good start
Even in this concept below some might have a problem with all the space behind the seats being an empty unused area and shaped like what a mid engine car should be like, to this I wouldnt care.

Making donors like existing replicas has lots of variables were taste and money play a big factor in... but in the big picture I say do what ever makes one happy instead of trying to conform to what ever.
Kit cars that are made to mimic something else but can't perform like the real thing, yes I'm against that. The term "Poser" comes to mind when I think about it. Personally, I'd rather make a stock looking car fast rather then doing it backwards.
My idea of a kit car would be the Factory 5 GTM, something that not only looks good but also earns the title of a "supercar".
My idea of a kit car would be the Factory 5 GTM, something that not only looks good but also earns the title of a "supercar".
This guy is just a giant troll guys.... Hes already trolled Beyond and 300zx forums...
http://forums.beyond.ca/st2/making-m...=&pagenumber=1


http://forums.beyond.ca/st2/making-m...=&pagenumber=1


I think you have some talent:
But the designs don't flow together. I think you'd really be better off just making up some simply bumpers to fit on cars and make things more subtle for them. You'd probably do awesome at making another Kuruma Z type bumper for the G... but not plastering the front with a futuristic design.
But the designs don't flow together. I think you'd really be better off just making up some simply bumpers to fit on cars and make things more subtle for them. You'd probably do awesome at making another Kuruma Z type bumper for the G... but not plastering the front with a futuristic design.
Bloated, mass-produced coupe? You're completely counterdicting yourself! You are the one talking about turning this "bloated, mass-produced" coupe into something that looks "exotic."
On face value it is a common car and the engine is pressed in tight to make it bloated unlike how the ZX was made.

But on the other hand this g35 builder has shown us the limits of what the donor can become and also you can see in my styling concepts that it can look slick.
So you're saying that because a 1970-something Ferrari has the equivalent 0-60 time as a 2012 Civic Si, it's justified to make a "slow" exotic?
I don't follow your reasoning. At all. Unless you're planning on making an exotic that looks like it's from 1970 to make up for it being slow.
On face value it is a common car and the engine is pressed in tight to make it bloated unlike how the ZX was made.

But on the other hand this g35 builder has shown us the limits of what the donor can become and also you can see in my styling concepts that it can look slick.
So you're saying that because a 1970-something Ferrari has the equivalent 0-60 time as a 2012 Civic Si, it's justified to make a "slow" exotic?
I don't follow your reasoning. At all. Unless you're planning on making an exotic that looks like it's from 1970 to make up for it being slow.
Honestly when it comes to doing this kind of custom work, people come into the shop I work with, with hopes and dreams. Then we tell them what the cost will be to do what they want. The usually walk away and we never really see them again. To make the G look like an "exotic" your looking at a LOT of labor. Hundreds of hours of labor on it.
Stretching the doors is not just something that you can easily throw around and do. To stretch a door say the G you have to move the B pillar out that means change the bracing in the car. This alone is a lot. You can drop 40k on body work. In the end you should have just saved up and bought a used Ferrari or Aston martin.
Stretching the doors is not just something that you can easily throw around and do. To stretch a door say the G you have to move the B pillar out that means change the bracing in the car. This alone is a lot. You can drop 40k on body work. In the end you should have just saved up and bought a used Ferrari or Aston martin.
Honestly, the G looks fine the way it is. Why mess with the design?
It's unique. That's one thing I think Nissan has always had going for them: while Lexus, BMW, M.Benz and all those other mid-level car companies are trying to copy each other, Infinti has managed to retain its own unique profile and design. Give me one other car on the road that even remotely resembles the G35 coupe that was designed before it was.
It's unique. That's one thing I think Nissan has always had going for them: while Lexus, BMW, M.Benz and all those other mid-level car companies are trying to copy each other, Infinti has managed to retain its own unique profile and design. Give me one other car on the road that even remotely resembles the G35 coupe that was designed before it was.
Why mess with it? well because its a modern donor that is relatively cheap and reliable and hopefully making a conversion kit for it will make it better looking. I personally have no faith in other people designing cars, Im not saying Im great, but I do think my designs would appeal to the public more then a stock G.
Last edited by Arashi; Aug 21, 2012 at 07:27 PM.


