G35 Coupe V35 2003 - 07 Discussion about the 1st Generation V35 G35 Coupe

Making the G35 into an exotic

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Aug 22, 2012 | 12:46 AM
  #91  
hologram's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 332
Likes: 24
Originally Posted by herrschaft
Because that designer has bad taste. That kit is rice
Lol agreed, I hate teh APR kit.
 
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2012 | 12:49 AM
  #92  
SDGenius's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 12,810
Likes: 911
From: Oside, SoCal
that's not the APR kit it's a Veilside Fortune Widebody
 
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2012 | 04:03 AM
  #93  
TORETTO's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 10,359
Likes: 1,941
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Why did he put bulking shoulders on it? Because it's a damn widebody. What do you expect?

What's exotic about it? It looks out of place, and just widens the car.
 
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2012 | 09:51 AM
  #94  
herrschaft's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,739
Likes: 771
From: Coast
Originally Posted by hologram
Lol agreed, I hate teh APR kit.
The APR kit is on the red car in the header, completely different.
 
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2012 | 09:54 AM
  #95  
hologram's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 332
Likes: 24
Originally Posted by SDGenius
that's not the APR kit it's a Veilside Fortune Widebody
Can't believe i got it wrong. Thanks for pointing it out.
Originally Posted by herrschaft
The APR kit is on the red car in the header, completely different.
Sht, thanks for pointing that out
 
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2012 | 11:12 AM
  #96  
driftsucky's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,985
Likes: 156
From: Rochester NY
Originally Posted by person who's never seen an R8 or NSX ever in the history of EVER!!!!!
Find me a car under 200k that kinda looks like this






You can actually get two of these cars under 200k if you pick the right combo. lol


ON that note, Aratari, if 200k is your benchmark, you can have MOST exotics for that amount. Sans a couple high end under 100 production vehicles, most of them fall in the mid 100's. lol. So see, Why build a crappy car when you don't have to.
 
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2012 | 11:48 AM
  #97  
Mr. Brett's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 648
Likes: 55
From: Nashville, TN
Originally Posted by driftsucky
@Mr_Brett: the 350Z....trololololololol
Thanks.
 
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2012 | 11:58 AM
  #100  
Mr. Brett's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 648
Likes: 55
From: Nashville, TN
Originally Posted by Arashi
I was debating this whole notion of what some of the guys are saying of a fast looking car needing lots of power, say 600HP to backup its looks... where a 308 old style model, fast looking Ferrari has as much power as todays Civics.
Uhm. If I pay $100k+ for a car, it better have a minimum of 400HP.

Your logic still doesn't fly. That's like saying, "It's okay for Ferrari to build the 458 Italia to LOOK fast, but to drop a K24 Honda motor in it."

That old Ferrari might not have had a lot of horsepower. But you've got to remember two things:

1) The suspension set up was designed for on the track. Not straight-line racing.
2) A lot of those cars are designed to race in specific classes with horsepower and weight caps.

Just because a Ferrari had 185HP in the 1960's doesn't justify an exotic like that in modern times.

Originally Posted by Arashi
I respect the G35 design, with after market headlights, its a timeless design and I cant say that Ive ever seen anything resemble it.
Why mess with it? well because its a modern donor that is relatively cheap and reliable and hopefully making a conversion kit for it will make it better looking. I personally have no faith in other people designing cars, Im not saying Im great, but I do think my designs would appeal to the public more then a stock G.
Aftermarket? Fail. The OEM design is just fine.

And compared to a lot of other "sports" cars out there, the G isn't really all that cheap. How about using a donor car like a Toyota MR-2 Spyder instead? Cheap, AND they've got rear-mounted engines.
 
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2012 | 12:21 PM
  #101  
TORETTO's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 10,359
Likes: 1,941
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Originally Posted by AmateuRN
Did you make this too?



lmfao
 
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2012 | 01:25 PM
  #102  
Mr. Brett's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 648
Likes: 55
From: Nashville, TN
One thing I've noticed is that it seems like a lot of people who make "custom" cars have an affinity for our tail lights. Not sure why...
 
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2012 | 01:42 PM
  #103  
guitarrocker98's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,065
Likes: 211
Look as a guy who does a lot of custom things personally, I have respect for doing this kind of thing. Well, not specifically making a MR2 look like a Ferrari or whatever donor car you use, but for building custom cars. Doing custom things takes a lot of well (skill). Just because you can do something does not mean you should. And just because your "machine" can do something does not mean it should. If you really want to do something completely different go ahead and build it. You will be into it thousands easily in parts and not to mention labor. I know you said you do it yourself, but these things take hundreds to thousands of hours to complete.

90% of people who start a project like this do 1 of 3 things.

1. Drop WAY TO MUCH MONEY INTO IT.
2. Spend years building it, and either quit or sell
3. End up finishing it Well over their time frame and budget.

All of them do one things though and that is lose a wife/girlfriend haha.
 
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2012 | 04:00 PM
  #104  
Arashi's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 21
Likes: 1
What are the other options though, owning a regular car like everyone else or working for decades to buy a great car.


Originally Posted by ME GUSTA
Why did he put bulking shoulders on it? Because it's a damn widebody. What do you expect?
What's exotic about it? It looks out of place, and just widens the car.
These bulges come from nature, are the Bentley ones also out of place?



Originally Posted by driftsucky


You can actually get two of these cars under 200k if you pick the right combo. lol

ON that note, Aratari, if 200k is your benchmark, you can have MOST exotics for that amount. Sans a couple high end under 100 production vehicles, most of them fall in the mid 100's. lol. So see, Why build a crappy car when you don't have to.
Duckhunt these cars look nothing like my concept.

Originally Posted by AmateuRN
Ah, I was trying to be positive and constructive... but seeing is how you're all about it for the money... lost respect. You can make money at anything -- if you're good at it. Look at your feedback, man... it's not good. I know anyone who sees your work after this point will discourage those all over the world not to buy your crap if you do actually produce it. How much do you think you can make now?

Do it to make something beautiful and unique- not a mixture of different supercars wrapped up on a 20 year old car... I tried to help you out... but you don't want to hear it, so fck off.
Yes how foolish of me not to listen to your advice oh great wizard of car design.

Originally Posted by AmateuRN
Did you make this too?
That Celica actually looks pretty cool, just the vents are excessive.

Originally Posted by Mr. Brett
Uhm. If I pay $100k+ for a car, it better have a minimum of 400HP.

Your logic still doesn't fly. That's like saying, "It's okay for Ferrari to build the 458 Italia to LOOK fast, but to drop a K24 Honda motor in it."

That old Ferrari might not have had a lot of horsepower. But you've got to remember two things:

1) The suspension set up was designed for on the track. Not straight-line racing.
2) A lot of those cars are designed to race in specific classes with horsepower and weight caps.

Just because a Ferrari had 185HP in the 1960's doesn't justify an exotic like that in modern times.

I guess you're against cars like the Mitsubishi Eclipse and Celica then, cars look fast, but are slow and lack good suspension so they are poser cars. Only if you guys could rule over the car industry and stop posing poor people from owning wanna be fast looking car.



Aftermarket? Fail. The OEM design is just fine.


And compared to a lot of other "sports" cars out there, the G isn't really all that cheap. How about using a donor car like a Toyota MR-2 Spyder instead? Cheap, AND they've got rear-mounted engines.
MR2's are ideal but not as common as G35's, so if a great kit is made, more sales and conversions can be made. That's one aspect of it, but for me not enough to justify it over an MR2.
 

Last edited by Arashi; Aug 22, 2012 at 04:04 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2012 | 06:51 PM
  #105  
TORETTO's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 10,359
Likes: 1,941
From: Auckland, New Zealand
The Bentley comes with the fenders stock. The G35 has the widebody kit for the fenders. See the difference? Or are you just really that blind?
 
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:07 AM.