G35 Coupe V35 2003 - 07 Discussion about the 1st Generation V35 G35 Coupe

$35k sedans comparo from C&D (from E60 board)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Aug 30, 2005 | 01:10 PM
  #46  
webhed's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by tekknikal
it is, but things still arent adding up...
I know, I know. We all go thru it sometimes in life.......it's called DENIAL. Don't worry though it'll pass as soon as Infiniti comes up with something to better our aging G35s.
 

Last edited by webhed; Aug 30, 2005 at 01:17 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2005 | 01:20 PM
  #47  
KAHBOOM's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,093
Likes: 0
From: NC
There may be many many factors such as gearing tires tranny set up, TC stall speed etc- more than just HP and weight that can make a difference in the performance. C&D is always a bit on the quick side with the acceleration numbers IMO even with the G coupe. No other mags are ever able to match most of their times. The fact of the matter remains however that other car companies are targeting the G35 as the car to beat performancewise.
 
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2005 | 01:26 PM
  #48  
terryw's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,337
Likes: 1
From: University of Maryland
nissan has some serious work to do, upping the hp by making it rev higher will keep decreasing torque, its not going to be easy to match/best the toyota 3.5l engine. im sure their technitians are hard at work right now to improve the vq35.
 
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2005 | 01:54 PM
  #49  
Deang35c6's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Originally Posted by terryw
nissan has some serious work to do, upping the hp by making it rev higher will keep decreasing torque, its not going to be easy to match/best the toyota 3.5l engine. im sure their technitians are hard at work right now to improve the vq35.
Yeah, it's called a 3.8L VQ with 324 hp and 282 lb/ft!

Some interesting data on the IS350...

Weight 3537 lb
306 hp@ 6400 rpm
277 lb/ft @ 4800 rpm
Compression ratio: 111 (no FI here)
Gearing:
I 3.520
II 2.042
III 1.4
IV 1.00
V .716
VI .586
Final 4.083

This car gearing very aggressively. All I need now is the MPH in each gear to make the assumption that the race is over past 100 mph. Fifth AND sixth gears aren't ideal for triple digit runs in this car. I can see why it got 0 to 60 in 5.1 seconds. Any compression past 101 is asking for trouble.
 

Last edited by Deang35c6; Aug 30, 2005 at 02:01 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2005 | 02:08 PM
  #50  
terryw's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,337
Likes: 1
From: University of Maryland
i doubt toyota would ever put out a unreliable engine. its probably really sturdy, strong block, heads and all that good stuff.
 
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2005 | 02:11 PM
  #51  
csdstudio's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
From: MN, western subs
Originally Posted by Deang35c6
Any compression past 101 is asking for trouble.
With Toyota reliablity and build quality, i'd take it. A win is a win. The G will lose, simple logic. Doesn't take a bulging forehead vein to figure that one out.
 
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2005 | 02:11 PM
  #52  
goldnbear's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Just wanted to chime in re: C&D Review.

I've read that review and they have 2 lines that contribute to their overall ranking of BMW being #1.

The 2 lines being to the tune of: "Gotta have it factor" and "Fun to Drive" factor.

Just a little qualitative in my opinion...but that's just me.
 
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2005 | 02:14 PM
  #53  
terryw's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,337
Likes: 1
From: University of Maryland
yeah C & D sucks. i believe their stats are still credible though
 
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2005 | 02:17 PM
  #54  
csdstudio's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
From: MN, western subs
"Gotta have it factor" and "Fun to Drive" factor" do not take precedence in anyones book over "it broke down, though, but still was fun."
 
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2005 | 03:24 PM
  #55  
EZZ's Avatar
EZZ
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,056
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by Deang35c6
Yeah, it's called a 3.8L VQ with 324 hp and 282 lb/ft!

Some interesting data on the IS350...

Weight 3537 lb
306 hp@ 6400 rpm
277 lb/ft @ 4800 rpm
Compression ratio: 111 (no FI here)
Gearing:
I 3.520
II 2.042
III 1.4
IV 1.00
V .716
VI .586
Final 4.083

This car gearing very aggressively. All I need now is the MPH in each gear to make the assumption that the race is over past 100 mph. Fifth AND sixth gears aren't ideal for triple digit runs in this car. I can see why it got 0 to 60 in 5.1 seconds. Any compression past 101 is asking for trouble.
The compression ratio is higher in Direct Injection cars such as the new Audi and Lexus. I bet up to the Lexus's governed limit of 142, the G35 sees its ugly a$$ tail lights.
 
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2005 | 08:17 PM
  #56  
GSCoupe's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver
Somebody just found out there's a mistake by Car and Driver, & there's only 74 points for the BMW 330i in "Vehicle", according to the numbers published by them

That would mean 212 points and tied for first position with Lexus.

8+7+3+4+3+7+9+7+9+0+17= 74 ???? not 75

Link : http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v434/BAHILL99/13.jpg
 
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2005 | 08:52 PM
  #57  
Deang35c6's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
That's some funny $hit. I wonder what other datum is "skewed".
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Frostbite91
Audio, Video & Electronics
5
Aug 20, 2015 07:20 PM
Frankieg35
Audio, Video & Electronics
6
Aug 15, 2015 10:49 PM
noctilucous
2nd Gen (V36) Sedan
0
Aug 6, 2015 08:47 PM
justgotg35
G35 Sedan V35 2003-06
2
Jul 19, 2015 12:33 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:54 PM.