G35 Sedan V35 2003-06 Discussion about the 1st Generation V35 G35 Sedan

test pipes?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #1  
Old 10-15-2006, 07:13 PM
aimhigher's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: north ca.
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
test pipes?

is it worth installing these? is there a noticeable hp gains? what are the downfall about installing these? i own a sedan and would like to keep it smooth.. will it effect it? just wouldnt want a rattling sound. thanks
 
  #2  
Old 10-15-2006, 09:41 PM
Gdup35sedan's Avatar
ENVautoDetailing.com

iTrader: (47)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Diego/Redondo Beach
Posts: 9,257
Received 136 Likes on 92 Posts
It all depends on what you want out of the car. The test pipes show noticeable gains but there are a couple downfalls. They are very loud, some raspy (getting resonated test pipes helps with the rasp) and they smell. You say you want to keep your car smooth so i dont think you want test pipes, sounds like you'd be better off with high flow cats. You'll get some noticeable power gains and a nice deeper tone to the exhaust note.
-GP-
 
  #3  
Old 10-15-2006, 10:07 PM
Klubbheads's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: LA, North Holly
Posts: 17,039
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
^Gdup do resonated test pipes smell also?
 
  #4  
Old 10-15-2006, 10:09 PM
Gdup35sedan's Avatar
ENVautoDetailing.com

iTrader: (47)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Diego/Redondo Beach
Posts: 9,257
Received 136 Likes on 92 Posts
Originally Posted by Klubbheads
^Gdup do resonated test pipes smell also?
I'm pretty sure they do, not as strong a smell though. I've never used test pipes but one of my coworkers with a Z had them and said the smell was pretty potent all the time. He had regular test pipes so i dont know 100% that the resonated smells
-GP-
 
  #5  
Old 10-15-2006, 10:19 PM
Klubbheads's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: LA, North Holly
Posts: 17,039
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Damn i confused u with vodkarocket. I know he had them thats why i asked.
 
  #6  
Old 10-16-2006, 12:54 AM
bbug's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pomona, Ca
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The downfall to testpipes is getting your car inpounded and seriously fined. Sport compact mag ran a test pipe vs hi-flo comparison and in their findings, they found a marginal increase in hp by using test pipes. I don't think it's worth the extra noise, the extra harm to the environment or the potential to lose your ride.
 
  #7  
Old 10-16-2006, 01:26 AM
ttrank's Avatar
Grocery getter

iTrader: (57)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 27,305
Received 189 Likes on 59 Posts
I would never do test pipes on the G. They sound like hell. You will have to get the mod to keep your CEL off. If you want a mod like this just get the high flow cats.
 
  #8  
Old 10-16-2006, 10:47 AM
MrBillMartin's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: long island
Posts: 678
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
your cars not gonna get impounded and your not gonna get a fine unless your stupid about it.

but your car will sound like ****. i had test pipes on my car for about 6 months, got sick of them, swapped them out for kinetix high flow cats. only sounds good under WOT, under normal acceleration the rattling sounds awful.

they are not worth it.
 
  #9  
Old 10-16-2006, 10:56 AM
DaveB's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 6,573
Likes: 0
Received 72 Likes on 51 Posts
You should contact Trey Hutchinson since he's had both HFCs and test pipes. He saw fairly miminal gains by going with the HFCs and then going to TPs. Maybe with some ECU tuning he'll actually see some useable power gains with the TPs.
 
  #10  
Old 10-16-2006, 11:22 AM
dyenboy's Avatar
Registered

Join Date: May 2002
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 8,680
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i heard from a member once they installed test pipes, their check engine light came on..

anyways..test pipes ain't a worthy upgrade..
 
  #11  
Old 10-16-2006, 11:52 AM
vodkarocket's Avatar
Modded Member
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: San Francisco, Ca
Posts: 3,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dyenboy
anyways..test pipes ain't a worthy upgrade..
That's a completely baseless statement. I love how people critique mods they've never tried. I've had every single bolt-on on my car, and the test pipes made the most significant difference. They're also one of the cheapest mods you can do to your car. I'd rank power mods as:

1. Test pipes
2. Headers
3. MREV2 + 5/16" spacer

I switched out from Crawford High-flow cats to test pipes, and the gains were extremely noticable. So much so that my 275/30/20's would break loose when I got on the throttle from a stop. With my tuning, the test pipes not only helped me gain power back down low, but really improved the performance up high. It had a similar effect to putting a lighter flywheel on a 6MT transmission.

The check engine light came on the first time I put them on- after resetting the ECU I never saw it again. On non-resonated test pipes, you do have to deal with a little bit of rasp, but for me the sound was a non-issue. As for other negative aspects, the test pipes do emit the smell of burning gas. You won't notice this while the car is moving, but if you have your windows down when you're stuck in traffic you'll start to smell it.
 

Last edited by vodkarocket; 10-16-2006 at 11:55 AM.
  #12  
Old 10-16-2006, 01:35 PM
DaveB's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 6,573
Likes: 0
Received 72 Likes on 51 Posts
Originally Posted by vodkarocket
I switched out from Crawford High-flow cats to test pipes, and the gains were extremely noticable. So much so that my 275/30/20's would break loose when I got on the throttle from a stop. With my tuning, the test pipes not only helped me gain power back down low, but really improved the performance up high. It had a similar effect to putting a lighter flywheel on a 6MT transmission.
Trey's dyno results conflict with your findings. The only place he gained power with TPs over his Crawford HFCs was above 6000rpms and the gains were in the 5whp range. Oddly, the TPs brought his AFs into an acceptable range.

I can post up his dyno comparison for those interested.
 
  #13  
Old 10-16-2006, 01:37 PM
vodkarocket's Avatar
Modded Member
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: San Francisco, Ca
Posts: 3,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveB
Trey's dyno results conflict with your findings. The only place he gained power with TPs over his Crawford HFCs was above 6000rpms and the gains were in the 5whp range. Oddly, the TPs brought his AFs into an acceptable range.

I can post up his dyno comparison for those interested.
Two things worth mentioning- Trey has a revup engine, and no ECU tuning.
 
  #14  
Old 10-16-2006, 01:39 PM
Jeff92se's Avatar
Red Card Crew

iTrader: (24)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: ɐʍ 'ǝlʇʇɐǝs
Posts: 37,810
Received 583 Likes on 496 Posts
What ecu tuning would be needed if the a/f were okay? The revup/non-revup issue is interesting though
 
  #15  
Old 10-16-2006, 01:50 PM
vodkarocket's Avatar
Modded Member
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: San Francisco, Ca
Posts: 3,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Before switching out from HFC's to TP's, my car had a "dead spot" up until 3,500RPMs. From a stand still, my car was an absolute pig. Immediately after switching out to TP's this flat spot was gone, as I mentioned, my car would now break loose from a stand still; a first for me with my sticky 275 T1R's.

As for the issue of AFR, there's a difference between it being in the safe recommended range, and optimal range. My car was tuned to run at optimal conditions, with modified inputs at 100 RPM increments.
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: test pipes?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:02 AM.