Blades, I just dont perfer to go that route. Low compression, forced induction. I like that. Okay. You like what you like, and I like what I like (a stock car). It is impressive that your car made that much over the stated specs w/o mods. I doubt there are any G35's making over 260 (or 280 for coupes) straight from the showroom.

FraudulentNeon, if your Firebird is better than your WRX in every aspect, why do you still have it? I am aware of the handling capabilites of a well balance front-engine rear-drive platform.. I do have a G35 with the Front-Midship platform, after all. And I take it back.. I looked up some numbers. The Firebird is impressive, and I thought the WRX would have done better through the slalom. The G35 is right there, too, if not a hair ahead depending on who does the review.

2003.5 G35 Sedan Desert Platinum/Graphite Premium/Sport/Aero/Nav/Winter

 

" if your Firebird is better than your WRX in every aspect, why do you still have it? "

I said handling.

2002 Impreza WRX, 13.86@96.8, $0 Mods

2002 Firebird T/A, 13.2 @ 108, I/E

 

Last thing to say on this topic is...I would not supercharge my V6 then go onto a Civic forum and say that my car could smoke their car....ofcourse it would....same thing as boasting about a supercharged V8 beating a V6....what's the point? When you beat the TT GTR when/if it comes out in north america then you have something to brag about.

Red/Canadian

 

Sounds good. Just waiting for my brother to get twin turbos on his g35 coupe. Bring it on

2003 Mustang Cobra
2003 G35 Sedan

 

ok.. i think this thread died a long time ago..

'03 G35 Sedan: ivory/aero body/sport/sunroof
Warning: Objects in mirror are FASTER than they appear