The definition of “intertia” and the definition of “switch” does not clearly define what this is.


As to your rant about “cutt fuel line” – I was referencing this post - its your own damn phrasing genious

duh - that was made pretty clear when I said this in post number #10

And the fact that the G apparently doesn’t even have this function makes it even less relevant… and also shows that your as clueless as I was about this “switch”.

I'm sure you will go on and on and on and on... because you have absolutely nothing better to do... but my 30 seconds is up with you and I've already proved you aren’t as "clear" as you profess to be... so I'll sit and watch you post up all your blabber now.

 

(so if the ign is "on" and the fuel line is cut, it doesn't pour fuel all over the place)

But go ahead and just completely ignore that was NEVER stated as the definition. Yeah I said it, why wouldn't I? It gives the reader an EXAMPLE of it's purpose (NOT definition). Far from a rant. It was one sentence. In ( ) no less. Wow rant? LOL what a joke.

The name interia switch most definately rules out "fuel line cut" as you are trying to make out to be (which was never, ever part of my definition in the 1st place)

What's revelant NOW is that you are desperately trying to prove me wrong with a statement was never described as part of the definition. Athough my CORRECT definition was clear and mirrored all the others that knew what one was.

Someone that has no idea what one was is trying to debate with someone that actually knows is probably the most hilarious part of the whole thing.

Yeah, I called it. out of context references being used as the main point of contention. Open book I tell ya guys.

 

^^^ huh?

 

What you've been doing this whole thread

 

And you’re trying to give a (poor) definition of a switch that doesn’t even exist… by using terms such as "cut fuel line” then crying that the switch has nothing to do with a cut fuel line… and insisting that the definition of “inertia” and “switch” makes it clear that it’s a fuel failsafe that doesn’t even exist on a G

You are brilliant!!! We are sooo lucky to have you here

 

Uh no. Please follow closely: (of course it's in the context of an autoforum about a device commonly know for cutting off power to a fuel pump) But what the hell, it has to be said.lol

Definition: Example of function: Both correct.

What you are trying to point out?

Perhaps you should flame Mustang also. Here's his definition:

OMG! switches cannot KILL and it cannot FEED! Plus, he's definition says it kills the pump in case the car catches on file (ie.. only after it catches on fire). Which is technically incorrect but everyone one what he's getting at. Everyone but hmm, I won't name names now. LOL

But I see it's getting personal(which we all know it did from your first not so subtle crack). Perhaps this is the time where you should be challenging me to a pinks race all out or something.

 

^^^ Bzzzzzztttt - 30 seconds is up... no more time for you.

Have a nice day

 

See ya, wouldn't want to be ya.

 

Did you get in an accident and the car won't start? If yes, then there might be another fuel related electrical switch that might have been tripped. It might help if you provided some background to your question