G35 Sedan V35 2003-06 Discussion about the 1st Generation V35 G35 Sedan

Should a had a V8, Brew__HAHA's LSX Swap

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 5.00 average.
 
Old Apr 7, 2011 | 08:36 AM
  #76  
gdriver2010's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 81
Likes: 4
From: Cookeville TN
i second his notion ^
 
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2011 | 09:41 PM
  #77  
Brew_haha's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 224
Likes: 40
From: BAMA


Spec 3+ with Aluminum Flywheel, and Spec throwout bearing, off with the spec stock stuff and on with the Sikky quick bleeder and line adapter.
 
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2011 | 09:59 PM
  #78  
Brew_haha's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 224
Likes: 40
From: BAMA
Still waiting on the motor to get done but held up by rod bolts being out of stock. Trans still hasnt shipped from being built but they did give me a 1 1/2-2 week window of shipment
 
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2011 | 01:00 PM
  #79  
Lucky-G's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,931
Likes: 7
From: STL, MO
So, I'm not gonna read through 6 pages of this...but I do wanna say AWESOME!!!!!

You gonna make it to IA in Nashville in July?
 
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2011 | 05:37 PM
  #80  
OCG35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (33)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 17,181
Likes: 154
From: OC - So Cal
Originally Posted by Brew_haha
because i plan on doing lot of boost..... maybe in the future going 427 for now just hoping to hit 600-650, and i picked up the motor for half of what ls2's go for.
you could do that with TT VQDE at a lot less weight... but V8 sound cool
 
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2011 | 05:47 PM
  #81  
Jeff92se's Avatar
Red Card Crew
iTrader: (24)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 37,810
Likes: 585
From: ɐʍ 'ǝlʇʇɐǝs
Premier Member

That's an interesting question. IMHO, I think he could get that hp number with alot less stress on the LS motor vs TT VQ. And probably run the oem high compression vs a built short block on the VQ.

But I think 600-650 is just in the reach of a fully cammed, headered, intaked, tuned 7.0 427 LS motor. Stock 427 Z06s are in the 515hp range? I'd like to see the weight comparisons of a built NA LS to a VQ35 with two turbos, intercooler etc...
 

Last edited by Jeff92se; Apr 8, 2011 at 05:55 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2011 | 06:24 PM
  #82  
OCG35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (33)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 17,181
Likes: 154
From: OC - So Cal
Originally Posted by Jeff92se
That's an interesting question. IMHO, I think he could get that hp number with alot less stress on the LS motor vs TT VQ. And probably run the oem high compression vs a built short block on the VQ.

But I think 600-650 is just in the reach of a fully cammed, headered, intaked, tuned 7.0 427 LS motor. Stock 427 Z06s are in the 515hp range? I'd like to see the weight comparisons of a built NA LS to a VQ35 with two turbos, intercooler etc...
he said he planned to boost... so the weight comparo would not be LS NA... even without FI, I think it's gonna be heavier... piping doesnt weigh much and SC or turbos aren't overly heavy, even with ancillary intercooler, etc... an FI setup on a VQ isnt gonna add as much weight as this...

The weight distribution is what I feel throws off a V8 swap... for a drag car it might be okay - but imo, handling is gonna be jeopardized quite a bit.
 
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2011 | 06:26 PM
  #83  
mcaron's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 0
If im not mistaken i coulda sworn snyper said his engine actually weighted LESS than the VQ?
 
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2011 | 06:35 PM
  #84  
OCG35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (33)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 17,181
Likes: 154
From: OC - So Cal
Originally Posted by mcaron
If im not mistaken i coulda sworn snyper said his engine actually weighted LESS than the VQ?
that would be surprising...
 
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2011 | 06:41 PM
  #85  
Jeff92se's Avatar
Red Card Crew
iTrader: (24)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 37,810
Likes: 585
From: ɐʍ 'ǝlʇʇɐǝs
Premier Member

Originally Posted by OCG35
he said he planned to boost... so the weight comparo would not be LS NA... even without FI, I think it's gonna be heavier... piping doesnt weigh much and SC or turbos aren't overly heavy, even with ancillary intercooler, etc... an FI setup on a VQ isnt gonna add as much weight as this...

The weight distribution is what I feel throws off a V8 swap... for a drag car it might be okay - but imo, handling is gonna be jeopardized quite a bit.
Right but he also said he wanted 600-650 hp. Might not have to boost to get that.

I think the LS is heavier. No question. But everything you add, adds up. The turbos feature cast iron exhaust housings that aren't that light. The IC while pretty light is thrown out on the far front end of the car. From an informal search. I get about 315lbs for the VQ35 and 415 lbs for the LS3 (I assume fully dressed for both)

So we are talking about 100lbs difference. NA. Turbo the VQ and I guess we can roughly assume a 50lb difference. At least the turbos are down low and back. But a V8 only has 2 of it's piston sticking out further than the V6.

IMHO only here. I'd probably would rather have a very warmed over NA LS than a TT low compression VQ35 wicked up to 650hp.

It's not a question of what's better/worse. More about preference and discussion.
 

Last edited by Jeff92se; Apr 8, 2011 at 06:48 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2011 | 06:42 PM
  #86  
NFSP G35's Avatar
? = 2B || !2B
iTrader: (22)
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 22,160
Likes: 852
From: Tallahassee, FL (or thereabout)
Premier Member

Originally Posted by mcaron
If im not mistaken i coulda sworn snyper said his engine actually weighted LESS than the VQ?
Um. No.

An LS1/2/3 maaaaaybe. But this motor is an iron block.
 
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2011 | 06:50 PM
  #87  
OCG35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (33)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 17,181
Likes: 154
From: OC - So Cal
Originally Posted by Jeff92se

It's not a question of what's better/worse. More about preference and discussion.
I don't think anyone said one was better or one was worse... and yes, it is a discussion about preference - that's moding in a nutshell...
 
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2011 | 07:06 PM
  #88  
Jeff92se's Avatar
Red Card Crew
iTrader: (24)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 37,810
Likes: 585
From: ɐʍ 'ǝlʇʇɐǝs
Premier Member

Originally Posted by OCG35
I don't think anyone said one was better or one was worse... and yes, it is a discussion about preference - that's moding in a nutshell...
I felt the point needed to be made. The one great thing about these LS motors is that headers, cams, intakes, tunes, heads etc.. yield some big (relatively) na gains VS NA gains for the VQ35 (even accounting for the 2 less cylinders)
 
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2011 | 09:16 PM
  #89  
Barcraft's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 52
Likes: 1
Wow Im so anxious to see the results
 
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2011 | 09:36 PM
  #90  
Hotdawwgman's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (19)
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 7,054
Likes: 124
From: SoCal/Chicago at Heart
Holy ****!!!!
 
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 5.00 average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:53 PM.