G35 vs. maxima
#31
03-08-2005, 07:44 AM
Originally Posted by Birdhouse
G35 has a better turning circle than the Maxima.
#32
03-08-2005, 10:36 AM
Originally Posted by gtbigup01
Lets not bring in the altima. The last time I checked the alti puts down betteer time than our G's with it's 245 HP
#33
03-08-2005, 12:24 PM
Originally Posted by RichK
Wow, I can't believe I forgot about that already. My MAx sucked as far as turning went. My wife hated driving the car because she would have to swing way out to pull into a normal parking space. It's pretty bad when our ARMADA turned better than the Maxima. When I let her test drive the G ( I was sold on it already), she noticed the vastly improved turning right away. I loved my Maxima, but I am not "looking back" at it.
Originally Posted by GEE35X
LOL Right on I forgot about that. I used to get so frustrated cause you could not do a regular U-Turn in the Max. You had to make 3 point turn. 
Wayne
Wayne
Absolutely right guys. If I remember correctly, the turning circle for the G35 is 39ft and the Nissan Maxima is 44ft. That's a 5 ft. difference, which is huge for a radius.
Believe it or not the turning circle was crucial for the purchase of the '05 G35 over the '05 Maxima. It's the difference between making a complete U-Turn with ease or stopping at the curb and reversing looking like a fool.
#34
03-08-2005, 12:31 PM
#35
03-08-2005, 12:33 PM
Originally Posted by EZZ
Actually, the fastest stock Alti gets about 14.2. There are several members here who have had 13.9 stock with a 6mt sedan. I haven't seen an Alti get 13.xx stock so I believe the G still has the upper had. This probably means that the G has a stronger engine because the alti is about a 100 lbs lighter.
Plus drag coefficient of the aero G will give it a big advantage in the top end.
#36
03-08-2005, 02:46 PM
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I originally owned a 2k2 maxima. With the exception of o2 sensors failing, otherwise no problems. Annoyances were the turning radius, handling and wind noise from the windows.
Unlike alot of people here I like the 6th gen max. And was in the process of getting one. It was roomier, quieter, felt like a more solid platform than the 5th gen. I must confess that I did not like it when it first premiered. But all of that changed when I got a 6th gen as a rental. I then went and test drove a 6sp which was almost a deal closer. Plus could have gotten it much cheaper than the g.
Well fate interceded one tues afternoon. The wife and I were out and passed by the infiniti dealership. I made one of my usual comments about how I love the looks of the coupe and sedan. She said lets go test drive one since we arent doing anything. Well we did(04 sedan 6sp). Instant conversion, loved everything about the car. This was Oct 04 and they didnt have any sedan 6sp w/nav so we placed an order.
Fastforward Feb now in possession of and plan to keep until I we can afford a M3.
Unlike alot of people here I like the 6th gen max. And was in the process of getting one. It was roomier, quieter, felt like a more solid platform than the 5th gen. I must confess that I did not like it when it first premiered. But all of that changed when I got a 6th gen as a rental. I then went and test drove a 6sp which was almost a deal closer. Plus could have gotten it much cheaper than the g.
Well fate interceded one tues afternoon. The wife and I were out and passed by the infiniti dealership. I made one of my usual comments about how I love the looks of the coupe and sedan. She said lets go test drive one since we arent doing anything. Well we did(04 sedan 6sp). Instant conversion, loved everything about the car. This was Oct 04 and they didnt have any sedan 6sp w/nav so we placed an order.
Fastforward Feb now in possession of and plan to keep until I we can afford a M3.
#37
03-08-2005, 03:51 PM
Originally Posted by DaveB
I have a special place in my heart for Maximas because I owned a 96 for 6 years, but the love stops in 2003. The 6th gen 2004+ Maximas are nasty overweight pigs. They aren't terribly slow seeing that one guy is running 14.2s@96mph in a BONESTOCK 04 SE automatic. There are a few others with 04+'s doing 14.3-14.5@97mph+ in stock to nearly stock form. The 265hp 6speeds are putting down about 215-220whp and 225wtq. Good numbers, but the car does weigh close to 3500lbs though.
The Maximas you shouldn't sleep on are the 95-03s. It's terribly easy is go mid 13s with a 95-97 Maxima with just an ECU, a JDM variable intake manifold, Y-pipe, modified airbox, and slicks. Basically $1800 in bolt-on parts, and I ran 14.3 at almost 100mph in my 96 on street tires and at 1100' above sea level. Stock the car did 15.3@91mph. I went from 160whp to 205whp. I can only hope to make those types of gains in my G35. The 4th gen (95-99) chassis is superlight (2900-3000lbs) therefore it's got great power to weight. Now guys are swapping 3.5s into the 4th gens. These cars will easily run in the 12s on drag tires because getting 235-245whp is a no brainer. One 5th gen owner (3.5 02 SE 6 speed, 260whp) has already run 12.8@108mph with bolt-ons, deeper gear, slicks, no passenger seats, and a 12lb battery. Raceweight with driver was 3100lbs. A handful of other 02-03s are in the mid 13 to high 13s on street tires. The quicker turbo Maximas are in the 11.5@118mph-11.9@124mph while most are in the 12s. Turbo kits are easy installs on these cars and the motor will happily take 400whp with no internal work what so ever. It's as if 3.0 VQ was made for boost.
Maximas are easy to go fast, but making it handle, brake, and ride well is a different story. The McPherson strut setup in the front and torsion beam rear axle are great for packaging and weight reduction, but you can only push the suspension so far. The car starts out with limited wheel travel for stock and lowering greatly reduces ride quality. I had H&Rs, Koni yellows, and subframe connectors on my 96 and the car handled and rode quite nicely, but it can't compare to my 03 G35. Same goes for the brakes. No comparsion. Both cars would probably generate similiar handling and braking numbers, but the G would do it in a far more controlled manner. That goes a long way. Don't get me started about the advantages of RWD
Me choosing the G35 was a natural progression and the Maxima crowd as a whole agrees that the 6th gen Maxima should have been the G35 sedan. Only a select few of the avid Maxima owners like the 6th Maxima. My G35 is far more refined and comfortable than my Maxima ever was, but the it should be seeing that it's a 7 year newer car. I hope my G35 is as bulletproof as my Maxima was. 160 1/4 mile passes with 3000-4500rpm launches on the stock 113K mile clutch. Never slipped once.
The Maximas you shouldn't sleep on are the 95-03s. It's terribly easy is go mid 13s with a 95-97 Maxima with just an ECU, a JDM variable intake manifold, Y-pipe, modified airbox, and slicks. Basically $1800 in bolt-on parts, and I ran 14.3 at almost 100mph in my 96 on street tires and at 1100' above sea level. Stock the car did 15.3@91mph. I went from 160whp to 205whp. I can only hope to make those types of gains in my G35. The 4th gen (95-99) chassis is superlight (2900-3000lbs) therefore it's got great power to weight. Now guys are swapping 3.5s into the 4th gens. These cars will easily run in the 12s on drag tires because getting 235-245whp is a no brainer. One 5th gen owner (3.5 02 SE 6 speed, 260whp) has already run 12.8@108mph with bolt-ons, deeper gear, slicks, no passenger seats, and a 12lb battery. Raceweight with driver was 3100lbs. A handful of other 02-03s are in the mid 13 to high 13s on street tires. The quicker turbo Maximas are in the 11.5@118mph-11.9@124mph while most are in the 12s. Turbo kits are easy installs on these cars and the motor will happily take 400whp with no internal work what so ever. It's as if 3.0 VQ was made for boost.
Maximas are easy to go fast, but making it handle, brake, and ride well is a different story. The McPherson strut setup in the front and torsion beam rear axle are great for packaging and weight reduction, but you can only push the suspension so far. The car starts out with limited wheel travel for stock and lowering greatly reduces ride quality. I had H&Rs, Koni yellows, and subframe connectors on my 96 and the car handled and rode quite nicely, but it can't compare to my 03 G35. Same goes for the brakes. No comparsion. Both cars would probably generate similiar handling and braking numbers, but the G would do it in a far more controlled manner. That goes a long way. Don't get me started about the advantages of RWD
Me choosing the G35 was a natural progression and the Maxima crowd as a whole agrees that the 6th gen Maxima should have been the G35 sedan. Only a select few of the avid Maxima owners like the 6th Maxima. My G35 is far more refined and comfortable than my Maxima ever was, but the it should be seeing that it's a 7 year newer car. I hope my G35 is as bulletproof as my Maxima was. 160 1/4 mile passes with 3000-4500rpm launches on the stock 113K mile clutch. Never slipped once.
#38
03-08-2005, 09:52 PM
Originally Posted by Gting
Plus drag coefficient of the aero G will give it a big advantage in the top end.
#39
03-08-2005, 10:07 PM
#40
03-08-2005, 10:29 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Diego, CA.
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#41
03-08-2005, 11:33 PM
Originally Posted by socketz
Now that we've heard what a bunch of G owners have to say, I wonder what the reverse argument would be from the Max side.
Has anyone bookmarked a thread that talks about this subject. Just curious.
Has anyone bookmarked a thread that talks about this subject. Just curious.
I've spent 6 years over at Maxima.org and the majority of the Maxima group has their sights set on the G35 sedan/coupe or 350z as their Maxima replacement. More often than not, when someone sells their Maxima it's for one of these four cars:1) G35 coupe
2) 350Z
3) G35 sedan
4) WRX/WRX STI
#42
03-08-2005, 11:50 PM
Originally Posted by Gting
I'm sure a stock Max would be very even for you in a run. A 6spd will probably pull on you in a higway run.
#44
03-08-2005, 11:57 PM
G35 = Full Sports Sedan
Maxima = 1/2 Sports Sedan
The overall package is more sportier in the G35.... Even tho the Maxima is just about as quick, It's handling is not on par with the G35... Bottom line is a FWD car will never be considered a true sports sedan regardless of how good it is..
Although I would have no problems owning a Maxima
Maxima = 1/2 Sports Sedan
The overall package is more sportier in the G35.... Even tho the Maxima is just about as quick, It's handling is not on par with the G35... Bottom line is a FWD car will never be considered a true sports sedan regardless of how good it is..
Although I would have no problems owning a Maxima
Last edited by G35keg; 03-08-2005 at 11:59 PM.
#45
03-09-2005, 12:30 AM
G/max/alt
I test drove the 05 altima with the vq engine and was quite impressed by the pull of the car. I also noted the interior quality as ok. I then drove a 04 max and the car had more buttons and gadgets than I could take in. It also pulled hard, but I truely noticed the torque steer and turning radius. Plus the weight of the car was noticeable. Then a week later I drove the G. It was like night and day. The G had cornering, acceleration, braking, etc. Plus the interior quality was better IMHO. Bang for buck you'll be hard pressed to find better than the G!