G35 Sedan V36 2007- 08 Discussion about the 2nd Generation G35 Sedan 2007 - 08

Not a G35 but a 2011 G25

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Aug 1, 2010 | 01:34 AM
  #46  
infinitipearl's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
i read somewhere (can't find it now) that it would come in a manual transmission in very small numbers, as i recall in g25s trim. lets hope that's the case...
 
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2010 | 11:23 AM
  #47  
use2vw's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
I can see it from a "corporate' pov... But from a 37 owner's pov...the G25 cheapens the brand..booooo
 
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2010 | 12:12 PM
  #48  
Wrathernaut's Avatar
Gentle Manne of Leisure
15 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 7,993
Likes: 1,050
From: Pennsylvania
Premier Member

Even at "just" $4k less than the G37... that leaves a good gap for a $3.5k turbocharger kit.
 
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2010 | 12:21 PM
  #49  
soundmike's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,093
Likes: 213
From: Inside my G
Originally Posted by use2vw
I can see it from a "corporate' pov... But from a 37 owner's pov...the G25 cheapens the brand..booooo
How so, exactly, does offering this car, in light of everything else in the line-up, and the much anticipated Infiniti version of a GT-R, cheapen the brand any more than similar offerings from other manufacturers does to theirs?
 
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2010 | 04:45 PM
  #50  
blnewt's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,699
Likes: 137
From: New Mexico
Originally Posted by soundmike
How so, exactly, does offering this car, in light of everything else in the line-up, and the much anticipated Infiniti version of a GT-R, cheapen the brand any more than similar offerings from other manufacturers does to theirs?
I think it's the progression of the G lineup that's a bit backwards (at least compared to the BMW & Lexus Sport Sedans). They typically start w/ the lower end car and add higher performing cars to the line. Such as the
IS 250/IS 350 then adding the IS-F. Or BMW going w/ their 3 series/5series, then adding their M versions later in the model run.
 
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2010 | 05:56 PM
  #51  
soundmike's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,093
Likes: 213
From: Inside my G
I see your point.

Although i don't agree completely with it since BMW released the 1-series, a slot below the 3. Lexus is also coming out with a 1-series, Audi A3 competitor for the 2012 model year. In fact, most of the luxury car makes are coming out with "budget" vehicles in the next year or two, if they haven't already. Audi, i believe, is coming out with two -- A1 and the A2.
 
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2010 | 02:05 PM
  #52  
Dante's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 488
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR
I think its a great idea to bring the G25 here, The G20 was a great car and its been 8 years since they last made it, my wife has one and loves it...although if Infiniti prices the G25 wrong, sales will suffer like they did with the G20....
would be nice if they start the MSRP at 27k-32k
 
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2010 | 03:01 PM
  #53  
mihalis's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 51
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by blnewt
I think it's the progression of the G lineup that's a bit backwards (at least compared to the BMW & Lexus Sport Sedans). They typically start w/ the lower end car and add higher performing cars to the line. Such as the
IS 250/IS 350 then adding the IS-F. Or BMW going w/ their 3 series/5series, then adding their M versions later in the model run.
Because when I'd see someone in a G25, I would think the same thing when I see someone in an A3/A4. It's not necessarily looking down on them, but I'm not necessarily impressed either. IMO when I see an Audi/Infiniti/BMW on the street, I should be impressed...not indifferent
 
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2010 | 04:50 PM
  #54  
tg1234's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 1
From: Canada
Interesting view for sure. The way I see is the G is an entry luxury car. Nothing wrong having some eco engine in it. Would I buy it. No. Would more people buy G who doesn't care about HP and 060? Absolutely. If you can get the same trim packages what you can get in the 37 why not.

There is a reason why there is/was 2 trims for the Infiniti M and the FX.

Maybe they are more into the tech gadgets and they pick the more equiped G with the small engine instead of going with the journey big engine and no or minimal options on it.

More options they give us better it is.
 
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2010 | 01:41 AM
  #55  
samsizzle's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 546
Likes: 6
From: soulcal (sd to la)
anyone worried about g25's debadging and making people think they are higher, while getting the advantages of better mpg mann i wish they werent dual exhaust or had some difference in body
 
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2010 | 07:34 AM
  #56  
g35xdriver's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 233
Likes: 13
From: Northern Virginia
g35x
i just see infiniti gearing toward a younger market. people in their 20s can better afford a g25, and the refresh of the 2010 g37 looks more youthful to me as well. i much prefer my 2008, a classier aesthetic imho.
 
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2010 | 08:26 AM
  #57  
Pitman's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
From: NYC
The G25 just added value to my G35. Thanks Infiniti.
 
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2010 | 08:59 AM
  #58  
Jayhawk815's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
From: Dodge City, KS
Originally Posted by samsizzle
anyone worried about g25's debadging and making people think they are higher, while getting the advantages of better mpg mann i wish they werent dual exhaust or had some difference in body
Who cares? This is being blown WAY out of proportion by some people. A vast majority of of models currently on the market offer different engine options, including many luxury vehicles. Big deal. And from reports I've read, the mpg advantages are minimal.
 
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2010 | 10:17 AM
  #59  
rpm&my_G35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,863
Likes: 116
From: Waterloo, Ont.
^^ True
^ +1Bn (a million just isn't what it used to be)
 
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2010 | 12:04 PM
  #60  
soundmike's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,093
Likes: 213
From: Inside my G
Originally Posted by Jayhawk815
Who cares? This is being blown WAY out of proportion by some people. A vast majority of of models currently on the market offer different engine options, including many luxury vehicles. Big deal. And from reports I've read, the mpg advantages are minimal.
Agreed. I really don't see how any of this affects perceived value in the sense that a lot are mentioning about. The big difference (in price, specifically) between a G25 and G37 is no different than that of a base 37 Journey and a fully-loaded 37. But that doesn't mean to say that the base 37 Journey is bringing anything down.
 
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:30 AM.