Rear ended!!! :(
#48
Don't mean to be a jerk about it but if someone rear ended me and smelled like alcohol I'd call the cops. The other driver now can claim the circumstances were totally different and all kinds of nonsense, especially since he had passengers (witnesses) in the car and it appears you were alone. Now you're talking your story versus his and it can get messy for you.
Who's to say that he won't be drunk, drive and hurt someone else in the future?
Who's to say that he won't be drunk, drive and hurt someone else in the future?
#50
Don't mean to be a jerk about it but if someone rear ended me and smelled like alcohol I'd call the cops. The other driver now can claim the circumstances were totally different and all kinds of nonsense, especially since he had passengers (witnesses) in the car and it appears you were alone. Now you're talking your story versus his and it can get messy for you.
Who's to say that he won't be drunk, drive and hurt someone else in the future?
Who's to say that he won't be drunk, drive and hurt someone else in the future?
#51
#52
Don't mean to be a jerk about it but if someone rear ended me and smelled like alcohol I'd call the cops. The other driver now can claim the circumstances were totally different and all kinds of nonsense, especially since he had passengers (witnesses) in the car and it appears you were alone. Now you're talking your story versus his and it can get messy for you.
Who's to say that he won't be drunk, drive and hurt someone else in the future?
Who's to say that he won't be drunk, drive and hurt someone else in the future?
The way I see it the kid has no defense. If he tries to defend himself against Gevo1 he doesn't have a chance even if he lies through his teeth. When you rear end someone you are always at fault unless someone backs into you. In this case no one would believe that Gevo1 backed into the kid at 40mph at an intersection.
Geronimomoe mentions what worries me most. "Who's to say that he won't be drunk, drive and hurt someone else in the future?"
#54
I agree with everyone on here who say "should have never let the kid go"..."he won't learn a lesson" and so on.
The way I see it the kid has no defense. If he tries to defend himself against Gevo1 he doesn't have a chance even if he lies through his teeth. When you rear end someone you are always at fault unless someone backs into you. In this case no one would believe that Gevo1 backed into the kid at 40mph at an intersection.
Geronimomoe mentions what worries me most. "Who's to say that he won't be drunk, drive and hurt someone else in the future?"
The way I see it the kid has no defense. If he tries to defend himself against Gevo1 he doesn't have a chance even if he lies through his teeth. When you rear end someone you are always at fault unless someone backs into you. In this case no one would believe that Gevo1 backed into the kid at 40mph at an intersection.
Geronimomoe mentions what worries me most. "Who's to say that he won't be drunk, drive and hurt someone else in the future?"
#55
As for lack of proof, technically correct as the kid wasn't wasn't tested. However I'm pretty sure it doesn't take much alcohol to be legally "over". I think 1 beer and driving within the hour of consumption could put you over in some states?
#56
Yep. IMHO should have called the cops.
As for lack of proof, technically correct as the kid wasn't wasn't tested. However I'm pretty sure it doesn't take much alcohol to be legally "over". I think 1 beer and driving within the hour of consumption could put you over in some states?
As for lack of proof, technically correct as the kid wasn't wasn't tested. However I'm pretty sure it doesn't take much alcohol to be legally "over". I think 1 beer and driving within the hour of consumption could put you over in some states?
#59
#60