07 g35 revup VQ37HR swap
#1
07 g35 revup VQ37HR swap
so heres the situation
07 g35 coupe 6mt revup needs a new engine
i plan on putting in an engine from a g 37 but i have a few things to take into consideration and some learning yet to do.
i would like to use a VQ37HR engine, along with it i will be using the g37 transmission, harness, ecu, driveshaft and mounts the computer will be flashed by our good friends at z speed. I will be building my own harness once i figure out exactly what engine i am using.
possibilities
vq35hr
vq37hr
vq35vhr
vq37vhr
what is different about the VHR engines
what is VVEL?
people have suggested using a vq37hr with vq35hr heads. i dont understand this. perhaps using a VQ37VHR with VQ35HR heads to eliminate the vvel ?
in the end i would basicly like to have a 330 hp na VQ37HR engine in my car what would you suggest as a good combo for block and heads
in the future the car then engine will be fully built, TT, with a 750 whp goal
07 g35 coupe 6mt revup needs a new engine
i plan on putting in an engine from a g 37 but i have a few things to take into consideration and some learning yet to do.
i would like to use a VQ37HR engine, along with it i will be using the g37 transmission, harness, ecu, driveshaft and mounts the computer will be flashed by our good friends at z speed. I will be building my own harness once i figure out exactly what engine i am using.
possibilities
vq35hr
vq37hr
vq35vhr
vq37vhr
what is different about the VHR engines
what is VVEL?
people have suggested using a vq37hr with vq35hr heads. i dont understand this. perhaps using a VQ37VHR with VQ35HR heads to eliminate the vvel ?
in the end i would basicly like to have a 330 hp na VQ37HR engine in my car what would you suggest as a good combo for block and heads
in the future the car then engine will be fully built, TT, with a 750 whp goal
The following users liked this post:
tswan1206 (10-12-2021)
#2
Bump
Great post and I am in a similar boat with a 05 G35 6MT and a blown rev up engine.
really close to pulling the trigger on a VQ35HR from an 07 350z with the 6MT attached
found a VQ37VHR short block I want to add to this equation
Guilty Garage is providing the wiring harness & ECU and I’m using there FAQ page to do the swap.
jumped on the forum for guidance and insight from anyone who has been down this road before I spend $4-5k and several hours on what seems like a solid plan for this car vs throwing another DE rev up engine in her.
MM
really close to pulling the trigger on a VQ35HR from an 07 350z with the 6MT attached
found a VQ37VHR short block I want to add to this equation
Guilty Garage is providing the wiring harness & ECU and I’m using there FAQ page to do the swap.
jumped on the forum for guidance and insight from anyone who has been down this road before I spend $4-5k and several hours on what seems like a solid plan for this car vs throwing another DE rev up engine in her.
MM
#3
I don't know about the blocks as I'm new to Nissans, but VVEL is Nissan's version of Toyota Valvematic and BMW Valvetronic. The idea is to change duration and lift together by adjusting lost motion in the cam profile. Think of it like a lash adjuster that can almost miss the cam lobe entirely.
The benefit is better fuel economy because with early intake valve closure, it avoids almost all throttle loss at low load. Another benefit is low end torque is better.
The drawback is the extra mechanism adds reciprocating mass to the valvetrain, so it's not as well suited for high rpm (not that that stopped Nissan from putting a high rev limit on it).
I guess it would make sense to swap the HR head on if you want to run it on the 35HR ECU and wiring. Otherwise, it seems to me it would be much easier to use a whole VQ37 engine.
The benefit is better fuel economy because with early intake valve closure, it avoids almost all throttle loss at low load. Another benefit is low end torque is better.
The drawback is the extra mechanism adds reciprocating mass to the valvetrain, so it's not as well suited for high rpm (not that that stopped Nissan from putting a high rev limit on it).
I guess it would make sense to swap the HR head on if you want to run it on the 35HR ECU and wiring. Otherwise, it seems to me it would be much easier to use a whole VQ37 engine.
#4
I don't know about the blocks as I'm new to Nissans, but VVEL is Nissan's version of Toyota Valvematic and BMW Valvetronic. The idea is to change duration and lift together by adjusting lost motion in the cam profile. Think of it like a lash adjuster that can almost miss the cam lobe entirely.
The benefit is better fuel economy because with early intake valve closure, it avoids almost all throttle loss at low load. Another benefit is low end torque is better.
The drawback is the extra mechanism adds reciprocating mass to the valvetrain, so it's not as well suited for high rpm (not that that stopped Nissan from putting a high rev limit on it).
I guess it would make sense to swap the HR head on if you want to run it on the 35HR ECU and wiring. Otherwise, it seems to me it would be much easier to use a whole VQ37 engine.
The benefit is better fuel economy because with early intake valve closure, it avoids almost all throttle loss at low load. Another benefit is low end torque is better.
The drawback is the extra mechanism adds reciprocating mass to the valvetrain, so it's not as well suited for high rpm (not that that stopped Nissan from putting a high rev limit on it).
I guess it would make sense to swap the HR head on if you want to run it on the 35HR ECU and wiring. Otherwise, it seems to me it would be much easier to use a whole VQ37 engine.
MM
#5
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Washington State
Posts: 14,799
Received 2,457 Likes
on
2,151 Posts
Coupe 6MT Premium RAS
The problem is always CANBUS, swapping from one generation to the next means literally nothing talks to itself anymore because it operates at a different bit rate.
As for weighing the benefits of the VHR, the DE is capable of a safe daily driven 600whp. The HR is capable of a safe daily driven 750whp. Both are capable of around 1200whp max for track use only. The VHR offers no real benefit that would justify the extra work to make the CANBUS issues worth the effort. If your chassis came with the VHR as the factory option then run with it. If you chassis came with the DE or HR as the factory option then run with it unless you really NEED that extra 150whp potential as a daily driver.
VVEL is only a benefit when operating at (or slightly above) stock horsepower levels and is usually disabled for anything making EDIT: BIG power.
As for the 3 year old question the OP was asking, the money and TIME would be better spent on weight reduction and other chassis improvements rather than a measly 30hp. Boost the DE, rev-up engines aren't actually hard to find, but you will probably need to pay an extra $200 delivery.
As for weighing the benefits of the VHR, the DE is capable of a safe daily driven 600whp. The HR is capable of a safe daily driven 750whp. Both are capable of around 1200whp max for track use only. The VHR offers no real benefit that would justify the extra work to make the CANBUS issues worth the effort. If your chassis came with the VHR as the factory option then run with it. If you chassis came with the DE or HR as the factory option then run with it unless you really NEED that extra 150whp potential as a daily driver.
VVEL is only a benefit when operating at (or slightly above) stock horsepower levels and is usually disabled for anything making EDIT: BIG power.
As for the 3 year old question the OP was asking, the money and TIME would be better spent on weight reduction and other chassis improvements rather than a measly 30hp. Boost the DE, rev-up engines aren't actually hard to find, but you will probably need to pay an extra $200 delivery.
Last edited by cleric670; 12-16-2020 at 02:22 PM.
#6
Oh yea, CANBUS is a problem. I don't really see how the extra 0.2L from the 37 is worth the trouble because the HR is better suited for high rpm.
There shouldn't be a reason to disable VVEL unless you're running higher than stock rpm, assuming the ECU doesn't do any "requested torque" comparison shenanigans that would make it go crazy with a turbo attached. If pedal position and rpm translates into a cam and lift position, it will work perfectly with some slight adjustments to the WOT setting to compensate for intake resonance under boost. Throttle response and fuel efficiency should be better with VVEL, particularly if you have a passive wastegate.
There shouldn't be a reason to disable VVEL unless you're running higher than stock rpm, assuming the ECU doesn't do any "requested torque" comparison shenanigans that would make it go crazy with a turbo attached. If pedal position and rpm translates into a cam and lift position, it will work perfectly with some slight adjustments to the WOT setting to compensate for intake resonance under boost. Throttle response and fuel efficiency should be better with VVEL, particularly if you have a passive wastegate.
Last edited by C_infty; 12-13-2020 at 03:49 PM.
#7
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Washington State
Posts: 14,799
Received 2,457 Likes
on
2,151 Posts
Coupe 6MT Premium RAS
Sorry I didn't mean "bigger" power, I meant like BIG BIG power. Any type of cam timing adjustment when you're pushing a BLOCK to the extreme is another variable part to fail and kaboom. Strictly racecar stuff though 800whp and up usually with huge valves, domed pistons, and high duration cams. For almost every other situation you're going to leave it functioning.
Cam locking kits exist for a reason Most people will never need one though. Big big cams with adjustable phasers is a recipe for disaster since they can actually be advanced far enough with the stock phaser to smash oversized valves to the pistons. Locking kit removes any potential for this to happen. Cars like this don't NEED low end power so no need for variable cam timing.
Cam locking kits exist for a reason Most people will never need one though. Big big cams with adjustable phasers is a recipe for disaster since they can actually be advanced far enough with the stock phaser to smash oversized valves to the pistons. Locking kit removes any potential for this to happen. Cars like this don't NEED low end power so no need for variable cam timing.
Trending Topics
#8
Great post and I am in a similar boat with a 05 G35 6MT and a blown rev up engine.
really close to pulling the trigger on a VQ35HR from an 07 350z with the 6MT attached
found a VQ37VHR short block I want to add to this equation
Guilty Garage is providing the wiring harness & ECU and I’m using there FAQ page to do the swap.
jumped on the forum for guidance and insight from anyone who has been down this road before I spend $4-5k and several hours on what seems like a solid plan for this car vs throwing another DE rev up engine in her.
MM
really close to pulling the trigger on a VQ35HR from an 07 350z with the 6MT attached
found a VQ37VHR short block I want to add to this equation
Guilty Garage is providing the wiring harness & ECU and I’m using there FAQ page to do the swap.
jumped on the forum for guidance and insight from anyone who has been down this road before I spend $4-5k and several hours on what seems like a solid plan for this car vs throwing another DE rev up engine in her.
MM
hello I’m currently working on the same , 2007 G35s car putting a 2011 g37 engine in it. Wondering what engine harness to use ? The g35 or g37 or will i need something else ?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vadeg
Engine, Drivetrain & Forced-Induction
6
10-10-2015 07:12 PM
GDUP G
Engine, Drivetrain & Forced-Induction
6
11-10-2012 11:56 AM