Intake manifold design:
#3
I've read that before and I love scientific articles like that. Actual applied science. How novel.
Reading stuff like that always makes we wonder about that the resonators on the 1st gen G intake pipe. Are they Hemholtz units or not and if so, why doesn't the Z have them? Is there something special about the Z airbox that the G airbox doesn't have therefore needs the resonators? The VQ Maximas have similiar inline resonators and they have been shown on the dyno that they are indeed Hemholtz resonators and improve midrange power by up to 8whp.
Reading stuff like that always makes we wonder about that the resonators on the 1st gen G intake pipe. Are they Hemholtz units or not and if so, why doesn't the Z have them? Is there something special about the Z airbox that the G airbox doesn't have therefore needs the resonators? The VQ Maximas have similiar inline resonators and they have been shown on the dyno that they are indeed Hemholtz resonators and improve midrange power by up to 8whp.
#4
From my time with the Z oem airbox (v-stack conversion):
1) The G has a way bigger resonator on the tube AND a larger resonator below the airbox.
2) The Z's airbox has a much smaller one.
It's my opinion that the resonance as far as it pertains to hp/torque lie in the plenum itself and doesn't extend beyond the TB.
1) The G has a way bigger resonator on the tube AND a larger resonator below the airbox.
2) The Z's airbox has a much smaller one.
It's my opinion that the resonance as far as it pertains to hp/torque lie in the plenum itself and doesn't extend beyond the TB.
#5
For those interested here is a desertation of design of system:
http://upetd.up.ac.za/thesis/availab...ssertation.pdf
There are 300 Million pdf filesindexed by Google
http://upetd.up.ac.za/thesis/availab...ssertation.pdf
There are 300 Million pdf filesindexed by Google
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post