Motordyne Plenum Spacers, Non-RevUp Engine Feedback
No, you need to reread that thread, and reread what he said. He said the torque was increased up top. That is, in the high rpm range, the torque was higher than it was on the stock track 350Z. And, if you look at the graph, you will see that it is indeed higher at 6000+ rpms. The max torque is certainly not higher, but at certain points, (above 6k rpm) the torque is higher than it was on the stock Z.
Sheesh.
Arguing on the internet is like running in the Special Olympics. Sure, you might win, but you know, even still, you are still qualified for the short bus. And yet I still do it.
Dave
Sheesh.
Arguing on the internet is like running in the Special Olympics. Sure, you might win, but you know, even still, you are still qualified for the short bus. And yet I still do it.
Dave
Originally Posted by caelric
No, you need to reread that thread, and reread what he said. He said the torque was increased up top. That is, in the high rpm range, the torque was higher than it was on the stock track 350Z. And, if you look at the graph, you will see that it is indeed higher at 6000+ rpms. The max torque is certainly not higher, but at certain points, (above 6k rpm) the torque is higher than it was on the stock Z.
Sheesh.
Arguing on the internet is like running in the Special Olympics. Sure, you might win, but you know, even still, you are still qualified for the short bus. And yet I still do it.
Dave
Sheesh.
Arguing on the internet is like running in the Special Olympics. Sure, you might win, but you know, even still, you are still qualified for the short bus. And yet I still do it.
Dave
Dave Im not sure what thread we are talking about. He may be right like I said. I understand you like to make underlying remarks. Its fine with me. Just what do you know? I would like to thank you for all your smart remarks.
Like I care what you think on your little EYE-land. You know you must be lucky not to live with someone close to you that has someone in the the special olympics. Your the one that should be in the special olympics you jack ***. Get a surf board the waves are longer than your road.
Last edited by GEE PASTA; May 16, 2005 at 03:10 AM.
I'm not going to be able to run the dyno because I've got to go out of town this weekend on business. I know that some of you were looking for the results quickly, so I am returning any funds that I receive. I will run the dyno, I just don't have a time frame at the moment. I don't feel right holding people's money for weeks at a time if I can't get the dyno scheduled. If you've sent funds via Paypal, I've refunded them to you. If you've sent me funds via mail, etc, I will return them to you once I receive them. I'm sorry guys, but my job comes before dyno results, ya know.
Originally Posted by scoobybri
I'm not going to be able to run the dyno because I've got to go out of town this weekend on business. I know that some of you were looking for the results quickly, so I am returning any funds that I receive. I will run the dyno, I just don't have a time frame at the moment. I don't feel right holding people's money for weeks at a time if I can't get the dyno scheduled. If you've sent funds via Paypal, I've refunded them to you. If you've sent me funds via mail, etc, I will return them to you once I receive them. I'm sorry guys, but my job comes before dyno results, ya know.
You can keep the money if you buy GEO & snM a few cold ones.
I think they both could use a few frosty's.
Pasta
Gee Pasta, I was trying to say that max torque (which is around 5k rpms) doesn't go up at all, but if you look at the upper rpms (6k to 7200), torque is gained. It shows about a 8ft/lb torque gain in the upper rpms. Basically you can't just look at peak hp and torque gain, you have to look at the whole graph..........though I can't see anyone really feeling a difference in power with this gain.
Originally Posted by ChazM
Gee Pasta, I was trying to say that max torque (which is around 5k rpms) doesn't go up at all, but if you look at the upper rpms (6k to 7200), torque is gained. It shows about a 8ft/lb torque gain in the upper rpms. Basically you can't just look at peak hp and torque gain, you have to look at the whole graph..........though I can't see anyone really feeling a difference in power with this gain.
I get really frustrated with dyno numbers. I will always go back to my old school way of thinking. The first thing that comes to mind is when you increase volume in your intake(Plenum) You loose low end power, You will always see a high end charge of HP.
The deal is you need a flat power and torque curve. In any racing environment torque is what wins races not HP. Your car like mine has a more built up high end charge to it. The trick here is to get it to run down low, Low end torque and drivability and get it to pull hard all the way to redline. Here is the problem I see right now. In your intake(plenum) you need high speed flow to pack the cylinders. The more air fuel mix the more power. Put any Plenum spacer, or pre 2005 plenums on you are going to loose that low end power that wins races. Or for the most part the joy of driving a car that has response. Here is the deal we all want. the best for are cars and sometimes we luck out and for the most part we do not.
This I can say I have found some very good results in my installs and the Pasta Mobile has some ***** down low now. I will wait for a Plenum change. Nissan may have done a great job with the new plenum. Im thinking of installing the pre 2005 lower plenum with the Crawford plenum. The pre 2005 plenums had longer runners. That makes more low end power. Papa Pasta
Originally Posted by nuck
On a350Z board a sort of related topic. A Crawford Plenum dyno on an 05 Z
http://my350z.com/forum/showthread.p...highlight=dyno
Keeping in mind this is an actual plenum and not the spacer.
http://my350z.com/forum/showthread.p...highlight=dyno
Keeping in mind this is an actual plenum and not the spacer.
1st gear 6300rpms to 7000rpms: maybe .3 seconds
2nd gear 6300rpms to 7000rpms: maybe .6 seconds
3rd gear 6300rpms to 7000rpms: maybe 1 second
Race over. In the 1/4 mile, it won't make any measureable difference in ET or MPH. The VQ might be fractionally (.1 seconds quicker at the top of 4th and 5th because the car spend more time accelerating through this rpm range, but not many of us have the money or ***** to drive at such speeds.
Power under the curve is key. If the plenum gained 8-10whp from 4900rpms to 7000rpms, then there probably would be a .1 second and 1mph gain with the plenum because the gain would be across the entire powerband, not just the last 40% of it.
Please forgive me for asking a question that has probably been asked 100 times.
Will this spacer give me the same results as it would if I completely replaced the plenum?
I'd much rather retain the stock look if possible and I'm not sure if I like the look of some of the aftermarket plenums out there.
Thanks,
Jeff
Will this spacer give me the same results as it would if I completely replaced the plenum?
I'd much rather retain the stock look if possible and I'm not sure if I like the look of some of the aftermarket plenums out there.
Thanks,
Jeff
Originally Posted by jnkirk1974
Please forgive me for asking a question that has probably been asked 100 times.
..
..
i just dynoed my 05 300hp engine whit test pipe,y pipe,and aam spacer
best pull 248whp whit a 226 max torque sae corrected and lowest 240whp
does number kind suck i was looking for 260whp+ so im like at 293 crank engine hp
can i say the 300hp oem engine is well overated that all bull**** marketing
a/f was very rich 11.5 in topend
the dyno brand is dynojet 248
best pull 248whp whit a 226 max torque sae corrected and lowest 240whp
does number kind suck i was looking for 260whp+ so im like at 293 crank engine hp
can i say the 300hp oem engine is well overated that all bull**** marketing
a/f was very rich 11.5 in topend
the dyno brand is dynojet 248


