Kumho Ecsta SPT (KU31) any good?

Subscribe
Feb 14, 2009 | 09:57 PM
  #1  
these tires good???

better than Vredestein Sessanta Ultrac n falken 452???

anyone have these on their car??

im getting 245/35 n 275/30 20s
Reply 0
Feb 14, 2009 | 10:54 PM
  #2  
I have them on my car in the summer time great tires, in winter they suck. I would get Vredestein Next tho sick tires for the price.
Reply 0
Feb 14, 2009 | 11:18 PM
  #3  
so which one would u prefer????
Vredestein or Kumho
Reply 0
Feb 14, 2009 | 11:37 PM
  #4  
i would go with Vredestein, i didn't have them but my friends do and they are extremely happy with them.
Reply 0
Feb 15, 2009 | 01:07 AM
  #5  
+1 on Vredesteins. Heard nothing but good things about them.
Reply 0
Feb 15, 2009 | 09:01 AM
  #6  
so...
Kumho Ecsta SPT no good?
Reply 0
Feb 15, 2009 | 12:45 PM
  #7  
^ it's very good, i love mine i just don't like them in the winter hehe.
Reply 0
Feb 15, 2009 | 01:36 PM
  #8  
As far as their winter performance goes, they aren't supposed to do well in the winter. They are "High-Performance Summer Tires". If you are looking for winter tires then buy a set of all-seasons.

As far as the Kumho's go, they are a great tire especially considering the price. And as far as "which one's better"? There really isn't an answer to that one. Different people will say different things. You won't be disappointed with either the Kumhos or Vredsteins. Also check out the Falken FK452.
Reply 0
Feb 15, 2009 | 08:09 PM
  #9  
humm
its really hard to decide.....
i duno which one to pick...
Reply 0
Feb 16, 2009 | 01:34 AM
  #10  
i have owned both and ran 20s with em...and i will tell you from experience...
The Kumho SPT are good for the first few thousand miles and after that(about 4000 miles), the road noise is very excessive...I currently have the vredestein ultrac sessentas and are very very quiet after about 7000 miles and grips very good...so spend a little extra and go for the vredesteins...GL
Reply 0
Feb 16, 2009 | 04:39 AM
  #11  
ooh thanks for the info
Reply 0
Subscribe