Volks SF-Winnings 19" Offset question??
#62
Is this a good setup and deal on an AT Coupe
http://www.350zonline.com/store/cust...?productid=144
The SF Winning is a two piece fine forged wheel.
This package includes:
(2) Front 19x8.5+25 offset with (2) Toyo T1-S 245/35/19 Tires
(2) Rear 19x9.5+29 offset with (2) Toyo T1-S 275/35/19 Tires
The Toyo tires are mounted and balanced on the rims when shipped.
The Volk SF Winning comes in Silver and Gun Metal, Gold, and Rays Metal Coat (RMC) finishes.
*Note shipping is $120 throughout the U.S. 48 continental states (Hawaii and Alaska are extra).
Details
Price: $ 3,150.00
This package includes:
(2) Front 19x8.5+25 offset with (2) Toyo T1-S 245/35/19 Tires
(2) Rear 19x9.5+29 offset with (2) Toyo T1-S 275/35/19 Tires
The Toyo tires are mounted and balanced on the rims when shipped.
The Volk SF Winning comes in Silver and Gun Metal, Gold, and Rays Metal Coat (RMC) finishes.
*Note shipping is $120 throughout the U.S. 48 continental states (Hawaii and Alaska are extra).
Details
Price: $ 3,150.00
#64
#65
#66
Originally Posted by bzabodyn
Those are the standard offsets for the 8.5/9.5 setup - many people here are running that - they look fine, even on a stock height car (even though they are very aggressive - one thing is for sure though - no chances of rubbing!)
i know that i need to roll the fender if i go with this setup, but i also want the most aggressive look.
And i will install Tein Basic also, so after i roll the fender and the coilover on.
Is there any more rubbing issues? I do want the best look, but also i don't want to lose any kind of drivability. Appreciate for your reply~
#68
I am still not clear here. Call me an IDIOT if you like, but what is the best offset. From what I am getting here.....you don't want much up front , but a lot in the back for an aggressive look. If that is true........can someone just come out and say...for a car with no drop do this..... and for a car dropping about an inch do this.......... HELP... this is like GREEK.
19.8.5/9.5 Front? OFFSET ?
19.9.5/10.5 Rear? OFFSET ?
19.8.5/9.5 Front? OFFSET ?
19.9.5/10.5 Rear? OFFSET ?
#69
Originally Posted by istick2u
I am still not clear here. Call me an IDIOT if you like, but what is the best offset. From what I am getting here.....you don't want much up front , but a lot in the back for an aggressive look. If that is true........can someone just come out and say...for a car with no drop do this..... and for a car dropping about an inch do this.......... HELP... this is like GREEK.
19.8.5/9.5 Front? OFFSET ?
19.9.5/10.5 Rear? OFFSET ?
19.8.5/9.5 Front? OFFSET ?
19.9.5/10.5 Rear? OFFSET ?
#70
Originally Posted by istick2u
I am still not clear here. Call me an IDIOT if you like, but what is the best offset. From what I am getting here.....you don't want much up front , but a lot in the back for an aggressive look. If that is true........can someone just come out and say...for a car with no drop do this..... and for a car dropping about an inch do this.......... HELP... this is like GREEK.
19.8.5/9.5 Front? OFFSET ?
19.9.5/10.5 Rear? OFFSET ?
19.8.5/9.5 Front? OFFSET ?
19.9.5/10.5 Rear? OFFSET ?
-SF
#72
they will clear fine, but I personally think that a 8.5" wheel is too small for the front of the G (esp. if you're putting a 10.5" rear) - there's a black G with Gold SF's that has that exact setup if you want to see how if looks (w/ 245/35 front, 285/35 rear)...
blackGcoupe - I think it's pretty much impossible to rub if you roll/shave the fenders with the 9.5 +19, 10.5 +17 offset - there are two G coupes running those sizes with 255/35 front and 285/35 rear and both are doing fine after rolling the fenders... if you want the super-aggressive look and don't mind rolling/shaving the fenders, that setup is the way to go... but in my case, I didn't want to have to deal with that, so I opted for a different setup that has yet to be tried-out (9.5/10.5 +29 all the way around)
blackGcoupe - I think it's pretty much impossible to rub if you roll/shave the fenders with the 9.5 +19, 10.5 +17 offset - there are two G coupes running those sizes with 255/35 front and 285/35 rear and both are doing fine after rolling the fenders... if you want the super-aggressive look and don't mind rolling/shaving the fenders, that setup is the way to go... but in my case, I didn't want to have to deal with that, so I opted for a different setup that has yet to be tried-out (9.5/10.5 +29 all the way around)
#73
Originally Posted by bzabodyn
they will clear fine, but I personally think that a 8.5" wheel is too small for the front of the G (esp. if you're putting a 10.5" rear) - there's a black G with Gold SF's that has that exact setup if you want to see how if looks (w/ 245/35 front, 285/35 rear)...
blackGcoupe - I think it's pretty much impossible to rub if you roll/shave the fenders with the 9.5 +19, 10.5 +17 offset - there are two G coupes running those sizes with 255/35 front and 285/35 rear and both are doing fine after rolling the fenders... if you want the super-aggressive look and don't mind rolling/shaving the fenders, that setup is the way to go... but in my case, I didn't want to have to deal with that, so I opted for a different setup that has yet to be tried-out (9.5/10.5 +29 all the way around)
blackGcoupe - I think it's pretty much impossible to rub if you roll/shave the fenders with the 9.5 +19, 10.5 +17 offset - there are two G coupes running those sizes with 255/35 front and 285/35 rear and both are doing fine after rolling the fenders... if you want the super-aggressive look and don't mind rolling/shaving the fenders, that setup is the way to go... but in my case, I didn't want to have to deal with that, so I opted for a different setup that has yet to be tried-out (9.5/10.5 +29 all the way around)
^^
#74
bza's reply is right on blackG, I have that offset right now with rolled fenders and I drive VERY aggressive (drift, track, etc) no rubbing problems at all and it looks very nice. To get an idea of how great these wheels are all around I ran a 13.9 1/4 mile on them last week so I dont think the weight really makes too much of a difference performance wise.
#75