G37 Coupe V36 2008+ Discussion about the G37 Coupe

New Navigation Looks Like It Still SUCKS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #1  
Old 06-11-2007, 02:52 AM
civic4982's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,466
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
New Navigation Looks Like It Still SUCKS

The new navigation looks like the interface still sucks crap.

Where's the touch screen that Acura/Honda have been doing for 3 or 4 years now?

Are they going to be doing voice activation for the navi?

A huge improvement I noticed is that they combined all the in cabin info onto the screen like they did on the murano and the FX/QX/and others (it's about f'in time). They've also got a much better input device than that piece of $hit miniature joystick that only a 5 year old child could have small enough hands to use.
 
  #2  
Old 06-11-2007, 04:30 AM
Hypnoz's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The 07 G sedan and G37 have the same navigation, which is touch screen or you can use the wheel/buttons.
 
  #3  
Old 06-11-2007, 07:00 AM
muscarel's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by civic4982
The new navigation looks like the interface still sucks crap.

Where's the touch screen that Acura/Honda have been doing for 3 or 4 years now?

Are they going to be doing voice activation for the navi?

A huge improvement I noticed is that they combined all the in cabin info onto the screen like they did on the murano and the FX/QX/and others (it's about f'in time). They've also got a much better input device than that piece of $hit miniature joystick that only a 5 year old child could have small enough hands to use.
Yes, the Navigation system in the new G37 looks identical to that in the 2007 sedan. It is a very good unit - and much better than the 1st gen unit. With the new system you have 3 choices (choices are good) - touchscreen, the round **** and buttons, or voice activated. It also contains your radio, music box, etc information. It is also hard drive based, making it much faster than the previous DVD unit.

It is one of my favorite features of the new gen cars.
 
  #4  
Old 06-11-2007, 07:50 AM
Garnet Canuck's Avatar
Traveling Administrator
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Rothesay, New Brunswick, Canada
Posts: 30,233
Received 175 Likes on 102 Posts
The Navi in the 2nd gen is absolutely amazing. The graphics are incredible, it's lightning fast, and like others have mentioned, it does in fact have touch screen and can be voice activated.
 
  #5  
Old 06-11-2007, 11:31 AM
mantisG35's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: OC
Posts: 717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by civic4982
The new navigation looks like the interface still sucks crap.

Where's the touch screen that Acura/Honda have been doing for 3 or 4 years now?

Are they going to be doing voice activation for the navi?

A huge improvement I noticed is that they combined all the in cabin info onto the screen like they did on the murano and the FX/QX/and others (it's about f'in time). They've also got a much better input device than that piece of $hit miniature joystick that only a 5 year old child could have small enough hands to use.
huh? it is touch-screen. PLUS drive a BMW with iDrive and that should make you feel VERY good about infiniti's navi
 
  #6  
Old 06-11-2007, 02:14 PM
ElixXxeR's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yea, to the OP, you need to experience the nav. It is the best in the industry for the class of car as of now, truly amazing. And the old one did not suck.
 
  #7  
Old 06-11-2007, 02:37 PM
anotha's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wasnt aware people did not like the 1st gen nav, what exactly did you all not like?
 
  #8  
Old 06-11-2007, 03:32 PM
muscarel's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I didn't say the 1st gen was no good, but re-reading my email, perhaps I may have implied that.

The 1st gen was very good for its time.

When Infiniti was using DVD, BMW was still using CD. Now they are using hard drives, and BMW is using DVD. They're a generation behind.
 
  #9  
Old 06-11-2007, 05:19 PM
bostonmerlin's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Boston
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1st gen was good (2003).. loved 3d view. what i wanted vs what i got was touch screen. back then the lexus nav was the one to beat if i recall. you could argue fingerprints but overall touch is faster for me to use. i cant wait to use gen 2. traffic, touch, faster, nicer screen/graphics, more car functions integrated. Hell, i even liked my sexy-momma-voice chick! The gen2 should be fun to use. This is where 2007 sedan owners should speak up as they've been using the soon-2-be g37 system for a while now.
bm
 
  #10  
Old 06-12-2007, 09:21 AM
civic4982's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,466
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
acura/honda navi is light years ahead even the newest one on the g37 coupe.

my mistake on it being touch screen though.
 
  #11  
Old 06-12-2007, 09:24 AM
civic4982's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,466
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by mantisG35
huh? it is touch-screen. PLUS drive a BMW with iDrive and that should make you feel VERY good about infiniti's navi
why compare it to something that sucks? you go drive an Acura TL or RL and that should amke you feel VERY bad about Infiniti's navi.
 
  #12  
Old 06-12-2007, 09:59 AM
G35_TX's Avatar
Premier Member

iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: South
Posts: 3,671
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree. Honda has the Navi systems down good.
 
  #13  
Old 06-12-2007, 11:10 AM
mantisG35's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: OC
Posts: 717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by civic4982
why compare it to something that sucks? you go drive an Acura TL or RL and that should amke you feel VERY bad about Infiniti's navi.
because i havent seen them?
 
  #14  
Old 06-12-2007, 12:09 PM
CHI-TOWN G37's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by civic4982
acura/honda navi is light years ahead even the newest one on the g37 coupe.

my mistake on it being touch screen though.
It's also voice activated, which you missed as well. I've had Honda/Acura Mercedes and have played with my Bro's BMW NAVI. BMW is the worst, followed closely by MB with Honda/Acura light years ahead of them. As long as this new Infiniti system is DVD based and has touch/voice it should be all good as that is about as good as it gets today. XM real-time traffic is also available which once again is about as advanced as you could expect.

Not sure what is so suck-crap about that
 
  #15  
Old 06-12-2007, 12:14 PM
ICHANCE's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Jackson,MS
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by civic4982
acura/honda navi is light years ahead even the newest one on the g37 coupe.

my mistake on it being touch screen though.
Hey guys you gotta remember where he's coming from.............................................. ................Civic. The world of the wrong wheel drives.
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: New Navigation Looks Like It Still SUCKS



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:58 PM.