Sway bars installed but have questions...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #1  
Old 11-05-2007, 11:26 PM
seung012's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Sway bars installed but have questions...

I just installed the 4 way ajustable in the front and 3 in the rear Hotchkis swaybars. I have them set at the one before stiff in the front and medium in the back. I feel a difference at decent high speeds (60 - 90 mph) and it gives the car a whole new feel. What I want to know is why people say it is undrivable if the whole setting is on stiff.... Can anyone tell me please and if you have this setting (stiff front and rear), please give me some info on how it drives and if it is safe enough to put it on that setting. I definitly do not want to go off the road because my suspension was too tight. Any info would be nice. Thanks!
 
  #2  
Old 11-06-2007, 07:38 AM
G35fromPA's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Philly burbs
Posts: 1,576
Received 38 Likes on 35 Posts
When you set the swaybars too stiff, you lose side to side suspension independence, which can do several things: 1) Make the ride a lot harsher, 2) force the inside wheels to lift on hard cornering, 3) Increase the forces on the suspension components and start breaking stuff like end links. Also, you ultimately can reduce cornerning traction at the limit. At the limit with a very stiff car, the tires become the most important factor, and in lower traction situations (worn tires, colder weather, rain, etc.) you are at higher risk of losing grip and sliding off. But this takes some experimentation to see what works fr your driving.
 
  #3  
Old 11-06-2007, 01:13 PM
redlude97's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (25)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,911
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by G35fromPA
When you set the swaybars too stiff, you lose side to side suspension independence, which can do several things: 1) Make the ride a lot harsher, 2) force the inside wheels to lift on hard cornering, 3) Increase the forces on the suspension components and start breaking stuff like end links. Also, you ultimately can reduce cornerning traction at the limit. At the limit with a very stiff car, the tires become the most important factor, and in lower traction situations (worn tires, colder weather, rain, etc.) you are at higher risk of losing grip and sliding off. But this takes some experimentation to see what works fr your driving.
+1, this becomes especially prevelant on the street because roads are never completely smooth like on the track. Hitting a bump midturn on the street with full stiff can easily put you into a slide because of the wheel lift.
 
  #4  
Old 11-06-2007, 01:22 PM
surfwb86's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For our cars, is it better to have it stiffer in the front? My last car was front wheel drive and I had the rear setting stiffer.
 
  #5  
Old 11-06-2007, 01:26 PM
Klubbheads's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: LA, North Holly
Posts: 17,039
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
^if u want understeer at the limit stiff in the front is the way to go. I have tried medium/medium on my hotchkis and it was too much understeer for my taste. At Stiff rear and medium front is the way to go for my style of driving.
 
  #6  
Old 11-06-2007, 01:28 PM
redlude97's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (25)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,911
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by surfwb86
For our cars, is it better to have it stiffer in the front? My last car was front wheel drive and I had the rear setting stiffer.
Yes the FM platform is unconventional in many ways, and responds better/more neutral with a stiffer front setting. This is against most suspension theory, but its what works in real world conditions and has been tested.
 
  #7  
Old 11-06-2007, 01:29 PM
Jeff92se's Avatar
Red Card Crew

iTrader: (24)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: ɐʍ 'ǝlʇʇɐǝs
Posts: 37,810
Received 583 Likes on 496 Posts
This on stock or modded suspension?

Originally Posted by seung012
I just installed the 4 way ajustable in the front and 3 in the rear Hotchkis swaybars. I have them set at the one before stiff in the front and medium in the back. I feel a difference at decent high speeds (60 - 90 mph) and it gives the car a whole new feel. What I want to know is why people say it is undrivable if the whole setting is on stiff.... Can anyone tell me please and if you have this setting (stiff front and rear), please give me some info on how it drives and if it is safe enough to put it on that setting. I definitly do not want to go off the road because my suspension was too tight. Any info would be nice. Thanks!
 
  #8  
Old 11-06-2007, 01:30 PM
redlude97's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (25)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,911
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Klubbheads
^if u want understeer at the limit stiff in the front is the way to go. I have tried medium/medium on my hotchkis and it was too much understeer for my taste. At Stiff rear and medium front is the way to go for my style of driving.
Maybe you should talk to gsedan35, the local suspension expert. Your setup is prone to understeer now, the opposite of what you are trying to achieve.
 
  #9  
Old 11-06-2007, 01:35 PM
Jeff92se's Avatar
Red Card Crew

iTrader: (24)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: ɐʍ 'ǝlʇʇɐǝs
Posts: 37,810
Received 583 Likes on 496 Posts
I think your statement is true only if he exceeds a certain point. Up to that point, he's right.

Originally Posted by redlude97
Maybe you should talk to gsedan35, the local suspension expert. Your setup is prone to understeer now, the opposite of what you are trying to achieve.
 
  #10  
Old 11-06-2007, 01:38 PM
Klubbheads's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: LA, North Holly
Posts: 17,039
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by redlude97
Maybe you should talk to gsedan35, the local suspension expert. Your setup is prone to understeer now, the opposite of what you are trying to achieve.
Im not sure how this setup goes with stock springs and shocks. But that setting combined with s-techs and z-shocks I have zero understeer. Infact when i go make a right turn and enter the corner too fast without giving any gas back can step out from time to time. Also It starts oversteering when i lift of on the corner while above 5k rpm. Right now there is zero understeer on this car. The steering is much more direct also.
 
  #11  
Old 11-06-2007, 01:38 PM
redlude97's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (25)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,911
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
Well after a long discussion with gsedan35 over on my350z.com, I was convinced by him that I should never had the rear stiffer than the front settings with the hotchkis bars. Just look at the OEM sport tuned suspension. The front swaybar was stiffened while the rear was left the same. Why would infiniti engineers make the sport tuned suspension more prone to understeer if that was the case?
 
  #12  
Old 11-06-2007, 01:39 PM
redlude97's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (25)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,911
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Klubbheads
Im not sure how this setup goes with stock springs and shocks. But that setting combined with s-techs and z-shocks I have zero understeer. Infact when i go make a right turn and enter the corner too fast without giving any gas back can step out from time to time. Also It starts oversteering when i lift of on the corner while above 5k rpm. Right now there is zero understeer on this car. The steering is much more direct also.
Which S-techs are you running?
 
  #13  
Old 11-06-2007, 01:41 PM
Klubbheads's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: LA, North Holly
Posts: 17,039
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
coupe s-techs, same rates as the sedan it, just 0.1 lower in the rear but 0.1 higher in the front compare to the sedan s-techs.
 

Last edited by Klubbheads; 11-06-2007 at 01:43 PM.
  #14  
Old 11-06-2007, 01:42 PM
Jeff92se's Avatar
Red Card Crew

iTrader: (24)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: ɐʍ 'ǝlʇʇɐǝs
Posts: 37,810
Received 583 Likes on 496 Posts
I have every reason to believe that almost every car maker engineers in either a neutral or understeer into their OEM suspensions. Most of the time, you have to make the rear a bit stiffer to get the car to go neutral IMHO
 
  #15  
Old 11-06-2007, 01:43 PM
Klubbheads's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: LA, North Holly
Posts: 17,039
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by redlude97
Well after a long discussion with gsedan35 over on my350z.com, I was convinced by him that I should never had the rear stiffer than the front settings with the hotchkis bars. Just look at the OEM sport tuned suspension. The front swaybar was stiffened while the rear was left the same. Why would infiniti engineers make the sport tuned suspension more prone to understeer if that was the case?
Because majority of infiniti's costumers are going to be average daily drivers who can care less if the car under steers or not. It is a common misconception that under steering is safer than over steering.
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Sway bars installed but have questions...



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:15 AM.