Engine, Drivetrain & Forced-Induction Have Technical Questions or Done Modifications to the G35? Find out the answer in here! (View All Posts)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD
View Poll Results: What kind of synthetic oil do you use?
Mobil-1 5W-30
133
64.25%
Amsoil 5W-30
45
21.74%
Other (please specify)
29
14.01%
Voters: 207. You may not vote on this poll

Mobil-1 or Amsoil?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Nov 19, 2007 | 12:19 AM
  #136  
HiTechOilCo's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 312
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Still2Slow
Nevermind.... just read your profile " independent AMSOIL Direct Dealer" enough said.
Hello Stil2Slow. Why thank you.

Again, check out the Product Data Sheets and you'll see. That's where you find out if an oil that talks the talk can really walk the walk.

Steve - Hi-Tech Oil Co.
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2007 | 01:49 AM
  #137  
636Racer's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,475
Likes: 0
From: 21°18'54.33" N, 158°05'55.47" W
I'll just throw this into the mix. I used to be in MLM and marketed Bi-Tron. I made some profit nothing to be proud of, but I was more into it for me and my personal use. I was never good at MLM anyways.

This is what I mean by third party validation:
http://www.bitronglobal.com/BTV.html

Although it's hosted on the bitron site, Business TV is the 3rd party validation that the company needed. I would probably fair better now if I was still with BiTron especially with the rising cost of oil, but I bought myself a good amount of surplus and I dont care to distribute them.

Edit:

Found thier website:
http://www.b-tv.com/s/Home.asp
and the link to bitron's documentary
http://www.b-tv.com/i/videos/bitronbtv.wmv

I havent seen anything about amsoil on their site either.

Damn...I may think about redistributing it (not the MLM part) and use these guys testimonials
http://www.bitronglobal.com/testmonial_racing.html

IMO, these guys are WAY more creditable than any distributor of any sort (me included).
 

Last edited by 636Racer; Nov 19, 2007 at 05:38 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2007 | 01:51 PM
  #138  
Jeff92se's Avatar
Red Card Crew
iTrader: (24)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 37,810
Likes: 585
From: ɐʍ 'ǝlʇʇɐǝs
Premier Member

So why did you feel a test that shows results on an old CHEVY 350 was necessary to post? Back in 1986 no less

http://www.getahelmet.com/jeeps/tech/syntheticoil/

Originally Posted by HiTechOilCo
Hello Still2Slow. Used oil analysis is intended to be used as a guide for that particular car, for that particular oil sample and not for making general conclusions. The reason is because the operating conditions and varying drivers can differ so greatly from vehicle to vehicle, making comparisons of used oil analysis laboratory test results from different vehicles, with different drivers, with different operating conditions, etc., invalid for comparison purposes.

Steve - Hi-Tech Oil Co.
 

Last edited by Jeff92se; Nov 19, 2007 at 01:53 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 02:40 AM
  #139  
g35ctuner's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
ROYAL PURPLE 5w30. couldn't be happier.
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 03:54 PM
  #140  
redlude97's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (25)
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,911
Likes: 8
From: Seattle, WA
Originally Posted by g35ctuner
ROYAL PURPLE 5w30. couldn't be happier.
I bet you could be if you actually performed a UOA on it
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 04:19 PM
  #141  
roneski's Avatar
Devil's Advocate
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,404
Likes: 0
From: Vegas
I've been extremely happy with redline (Group V polyol ester-based ).
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 05:37 PM
  #142  
G35_TX's Avatar
Premier Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,671
Likes: 1
From: South
Premier Member

Originally Posted by redlude97
I bet you could be if you actually performed a UOA on it
Agreed. He be very surprised of what the results would be from it.
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 09:07 PM
  #143  
w0ady's Avatar
fgc moderator
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 15,085
Likes: 19
From: jacksonville, fl
mobil 1 10w-30 since im down south and n/a.
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 09:17 PM
  #144  
Jeff92se's Avatar
Red Card Crew
iTrader: (24)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 37,810
Likes: 585
From: ɐʍ 'ǝlʇʇɐǝs
Premier Member

Russ were you talking about Resolute? He's know his stuff
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 09:43 PM
  #145  
Resolute's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Jeff92se
Russ were you talking about Resolute? He's know his stuff
Well, I try not to be stupid, LOL.
I saw the sticky I made posted over here too, thought I should register and defend my intentions on it. Too bad I missed it when it got copied.

Will

edit: I guess you and Redlude are on both sites? G forum not as active or something?
 
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2007 | 08:32 AM
  #146  
G35_TX's Avatar
Premier Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,671
Likes: 1
From: South
Premier Member

I can believe he knows his stuff, but when he says M1 isn't a Group III then I am sorry that is plain wrong.
 
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2007 | 11:56 AM
  #147  
Jeff92se's Avatar
Red Card Crew
iTrader: (24)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 37,810
Likes: 585
From: ɐʍ 'ǝlʇʇɐǝs
Premier Member

Dude probably knows more about oil than you. And I do believe his point wasn't the fact that Mobil isn't Grp IV. It's how they stack up on the analysis tests.

Originally Posted by G35_TX
I can believe he knows his stuff, but when he says M1 isn't a Group III then I am sorry that is plain wrong.
 
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2007 | 12:12 PM
  #148  
G35_TX's Avatar
Premier Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,671
Likes: 1
From: South
Premier Member

Actually if you read his posts over there, you will see he said M1 is not a Group III and is a PAO based which is false.
 
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2007 | 12:35 PM
  #149  
Resolute's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by G35_TX
Actually if you read his posts over there, you will see he said M1 is not a Group III and is a PAO based which is false.
If you claim this, then the burden of proof is on you to prove it. You have yet to do so.

ALL of the M1 oils have a PAO base stock in them. Again, that should not even be question. How much of their base oils are comprised of PAO is up for debate, but NONE of them are a hydroisomerized, G3 oil. Blend of the two? Absolutely, PAO's have to be in a blend because they are horrible solvents.

I've given you some proof, you have shown me none. Opinions aren't evidence. If they were, then this thread would back me up since the majority backs up Mobil1, but I'm not that subjective of results. Hence, I posted actual data.

On the subject of this thread, I'm surprised so many use the M1 5W-30 and 10W-30 oils. For the money, there are better options. Not because of wild accusations with no proof about M1 not being a "true' synthetic, but because both of these blends have over eight UOA's apiece with only average results. They'll work just fine for your engine without issue, but for the six bucks a quart, I'd recommend at least the 0W-40 or Castrol Syntec 0W-30 weights. If you have to use a 5W-30 for whatever reason, and the options are only between the M1 or ASL... then the ASL is probably a better pick if you don't mind shelling out the money.

Will
 
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2007 | 01:49 PM
  #150  
Jeff92se's Avatar
Red Card Crew
iTrader: (24)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 37,810
Likes: 585
From: ɐʍ 'ǝlʇʇɐǝs
Premier Member

I run the Mobil 5w30 because Walmart had 5 qts for around $22. When I run out, I was considering Penzoil Platinum but I think I remember seeing their TBN numbers not being great. Okay for my short change intervals but..
 
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 1 votes, 5.00 average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:16 PM.