FI: we're not in Kansas anymore...
Those are by far the wierdest dyno graphs I have ever seen it looks like they picked up lots of torque down low by increasing the boost but no WHP is odd.
Also I would suggest not writing about how low the dyno reads, most people that have been around and know what they are talking about will call you out on that. Every shop on the planet claims they have a low reading dyno or a heart breaker
Also I would suggest not writing about how low the dyno reads, most people that have been around and know what they are talking about will call you out on that. Every shop on the planet claims they have a low reading dyno or a heart breaker
To be quite honest I was kind of leaning on the hope that someone else could interpret it better than I could... I think because we were focussing on torque numbers most of what's included is torque related down low- as it doesn't seem to have affected much up high.
Also, most of what the shop and I have ever talked about was picking up "the dig" which I think this does show. I'm a bit confused as to what the old numbers are on the old tune / baseline were versus the new ones... and if HP is on the one graph as well as boost and it's all boost on the other... And now I'm at work for the week so probably won't get a chance to approach them about it and get a walkthrough until at least when I get home.
Also, most of what the shop and I have ever talked about was picking up "the dig" which I think this does show. I'm a bit confused as to what the old numbers are on the old tune / baseline were versus the new ones... and if HP is on the one graph as well as boost and it's all boost on the other... And now I'm at work for the week so probably won't get a chance to approach them about it and get a walkthrough until at least when I get home.
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,282
Likes: 219
From: Alberta
Sigh. Wish it were that easy. As for commenting on the low reading Dyno- seemed to me the mustangs were the lowest reading Dyno out there so I'm not really breaking any new ground there. I guess either way i either head back to Seattle at some point with the car and face my border nightmares again or head to red deer. I don't think there are dynojets anywhere else in my area?
Bout time for a road trip, anyway, innit?
No snow in Calgary, i saw motorbikes out today and it was +10
You mayb right. We will see what the built long block on e85 actually puts down. Gotta do the 6mt swap before though. If not time to upgrade the turbos and I want to get that treads tone single interfooler
Well I was at 367 hp 399 tq on stock block on my 5at at 7lbs on 93. That was on a mustang dyno. We will see. Not trying to chase the high numbers game otherwise I would of sleeved the block. Just mayb time to upgrade the turbos. What do the experts recommend?
Last edited by r1forever80; Apr 25, 2012 at 11:05 PM.
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,282
Likes: 219
From: Alberta
I know what I'd be taking a hard look at is those new GTX turbos and how they would fit into your budget... I wish I had the expertise to weigh in but in terms of where you go from here it sounds like you have your work cut out for you with the swap.
I only know the obvious stuff...
I only know the obvious stuff...
The billet wheels will gain a bit of power, but you would be farther ahead to swap for a 700 or 850bb kit. You will need new turbos and the passenger side manifold ($400 for the mani when i checked last) to upgrade to either of those kits everything else is the same.








