G35 Coupe V35 2003 - 07 Discussion about the 1st Generation V35 G35 Coupe

NSX over G35?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #16  
Old 06-21-2012, 04:07 PM
DrMax's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Quebec, Canada
Posts: 355
Received 30 Likes on 24 Posts
Would buy a R35 before a nsx but thats my opinion....I must admit that the red nsx on the pixture is dope!!
 
  #17  
Old 06-21-2012, 04:16 PM
tylerxfire's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,466
Received 56 Likes on 49 Posts
this is the dumbest question ever...these 2 cars just cannot be compared...and the nsx is not gonna be found in good shape with anything near decent miles for under 20k
 
  #18  
Old 06-21-2012, 04:30 PM
dominate's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: O'ahu, Hawai'i
Posts: 929
Received 89 Likes on 73 Posts
This is what you'll be paying for an NSX: http://motors.shop.ebay.com/sch/Cars....html?_nkw=nsx
 
  #19  
Old 06-21-2012, 05:17 PM
SukaZenki's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: 916/847/650/415/408/510/512/406
Posts: 972
Received 21 Likes on 20 Posts
Originally Posted by tylerxfire
this is the dumbest question ever...these 2 cars just cannot be compared...and the nsx is not gonna be found in good shape with anything near decent miles for under 20k

I agree +1Milion

But to answer this stupid question, I will give up my G35 for a NSX anyday if given to me...LoL
 
  #20  
Old 06-21-2012, 05:19 PM
Imperial1's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Toronto
Posts: 164
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by partyman66
No way dude!

As long as we're talking about the 3.2 liter NSX cars (that means anything post 1996) and one with a 6-speed manually tranny, they are superior to all year stock G35's in basically all areas of performance..... dead-stop acceleration, top speed (by a good 20 MPH), and handling (by a lot). Those NSXs are pretty light for the power they produce(3000-3200 pounds and about 290 HP), even though the power they produce is not amazingly high by modern standards. They also have a good transmission which helps make the car lively despite non-jawdrapping raw power numbers from the motor on paper. The motor is designed to make power at high RPMs so it performs well as a track/race type vehicle that wants to be driven hard.

I would take an equally-good condition newer NSX over my G35 without even batting an eye, if it were a straight-up trade without me having to throw in cash to balance it out. That's a no-brainer.

^^ you beat me to it lol. There's no way a stock G35 will outrun a stock 3.2L NSX in any situation. Those cars are super light.. made with aluminum instead of steel. They're under 3000lbs and our G35's are elephants in comparison.
 
  #21  
Old 06-21-2012, 05:33 PM
VQ35 revv's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Calgary / Ft mac
Posts: 165
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
NSX was the first mass produced car with a full Aluminum body. They are legendary in performance, and hold their value like no other!
 
  #22  
Old 06-21-2012, 06:46 PM
superchargedg's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: maryland
Posts: 4,451
Received 65 Likes on 56 Posts
I love the NSX's but wouldnt take one over my G as i have to much invested in it...but god i love that car.
 
  #23  
Old 06-21-2012, 08:55 PM
TougeMonsterG35's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Salinas Ca
Posts: 805
Received 31 Likes on 27 Posts
i think the NSX was like 70k brand new and its mid engine....... g35 was like 30-35 and fat as *** ( i love the ish out of my fat girl ) at the end of the day they aint even in the same ballpark sorry
 
  #24  
Old 06-21-2012, 10:25 PM
soysssauce's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 159
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by lcysimon
Awesome car.. but too many years and miles... A 92 or 93 will run you $25k at this point...

If you're in for the MR, get a Cayman S (About $30-35K) and don't ever test drive a 911 S =P

Oh btw, did I mention... no bluetooth, navigation, heated seats and nice leather..

blue tooth and nav, a double din will do that.. in fact thats y i am hesitate to get double din for my g cuz im thinking about getting an nsx.

im thinking to spend abt 35000 btw..with less then 50000 miles..
 
  #25  
Old 06-21-2012, 10:27 PM
soysssauce's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 159
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by tylerxfire
this is the dumbest question ever...these 2 cars just cannot be compared...and the nsx is not gonna be found in good shape with anything near decent miles for under 20k
forgot to mention im thinking to spend under 35000 to find some under 50000 miles....but still struggling about if its worth it.
 
  #26  
Old 06-21-2012, 10:30 PM
bluedevils95's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 19,624
Received 576 Likes on 502 Posts
If i had the money i would get the NSX. They are sexy cars. Bluebatmobile has an awesome NSX and completely loves the car.
 
  #27  
Old 06-26-2012, 04:14 PM
Blue_Batmobile's Avatar
Official Sponsor of the Florida G35 Club
iTrader: (28)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 4,654
Received 33 Likes on 28 Posts
Originally Posted by AzuMaster



I will take this over 99% of the cars on the road today!! Shout out to BlueBatmobile


B@t
 
  #28  
Old 06-26-2012, 04:52 PM
live fast's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The nsx is a nice looking car but i wouldn't trade my G for it. If your looking for power and your willing to spend 35k or less go with a supra, more power then the nsx and g.
 
  #29  
Old 06-26-2012, 05:26 PM
partyman66's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Southeastern Mass.
Posts: 3,560
Received 228 Likes on 199 Posts
Originally Posted by live fast
The nsx is a nice looking car but i wouldn't trade my G for it. If your looking for power and your willing to spend 35k or less go with a supra, more power then the nsx and g.
If power is the only concern, there are a plethora of other cars out there for $35K that will blow the doors off of a G35/NSX or a Supra. A used good condition fairly-stock Supra is probably the most expensive possible way you could get into a car more powerful than a G35/NSX.

If you just want to go fast in a straight line, buy an LS-powered GM vehicle or a used SVT Mustang. You can get those nowadays for 1/3 to half of what you'd spend on a Supra, and they have more power in stock form.
 
  #30  
Old 06-26-2012, 05:38 PM
HighOctane's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2012
Location: SFV 818
Posts: 146
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Ill still take the nsx over the G
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: NSX over G35?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:20 AM.