NSX over G35?
This is what you'll be paying for an NSX: http://motors.shop.ebay.com/sch/Cars....html?_nkw=nsx
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 972
Likes: 21
From: 916/847/650/415/408/510/512/406
I agree +1Milion
But to answer this stupid question, I will give up my G35 for a NSX anyday if given to me...LoL
No way dude!
As long as we're talking about the 3.2 liter NSX cars (that means anything post 1996) and one with a 6-speed manually tranny, they are superior to all year stock G35's in basically all areas of performance..... dead-stop acceleration, top speed (by a good 20 MPH), and handling (by a lot). Those NSXs are pretty light for the power they produce(3000-3200 pounds and about 290 HP), even though the power they produce is not amazingly high by modern standards. They also have a good transmission which helps make the car lively despite non-jawdrapping raw power numbers from the motor on paper. The motor is designed to make power at high RPMs so it performs well as a track/race type vehicle that wants to be driven hard.
I would take an equally-good condition newer NSX over my G35 without even batting an eye, if it were a straight-up trade without me having to throw in cash to balance it out. That's a no-brainer.
As long as we're talking about the 3.2 liter NSX cars (that means anything post 1996) and one with a 6-speed manually tranny, they are superior to all year stock G35's in basically all areas of performance..... dead-stop acceleration, top speed (by a good 20 MPH), and handling (by a lot). Those NSXs are pretty light for the power they produce(3000-3200 pounds and about 290 HP), even though the power they produce is not amazingly high by modern standards. They also have a good transmission which helps make the car lively despite non-jawdrapping raw power numbers from the motor on paper. The motor is designed to make power at high RPMs so it performs well as a track/race type vehicle that wants to be driven hard.
I would take an equally-good condition newer NSX over my G35 without even batting an eye, if it were a straight-up trade without me having to throw in cash to balance it out. That's a no-brainer.
^^ you beat me to it lol. There's no way a stock G35 will outrun a stock 3.2L NSX in any situation. Those cars are super light.. made with aluminum instead of steel. They're under 3000lbs and our G35's are elephants in comparison.
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 805
Likes: 31
From: Salinas Ca
i think the NSX was like 70k brand new and its mid engine....... g35 was like 30-35 and fat as *** ( i love the ish out of my fat girl ) at the end of the day they aint even in the same ballpark sorry
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 159
Likes: 2
blue tooth and nav, a double din will do that.. in fact thats y i am hesitate to get double din for my g cuz im thinking about getting an nsx.
im thinking to spend abt 35000 btw..with less then 50000 miles..
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 159
Likes: 2
forgot to mention im thinking to spend under 35000 to find some under 50000 miles....but still struggling about if its worth it.
If you just want to go fast in a straight line, buy an LS-powered GM vehicle or a used SVT Mustang. You can get those nowadays for 1/3 to half of what you'd spend on a Supra, and they have more power in stock form.
