I read a few of you commenting that the lack of a sunroof is preferable. It's subjective, I know, but I was wondering if it's just the relative rarity, or if there's a technical reason like reduced body flex, etc. Thanks!

 

It was cheaper to manufacture. Stop, you have a unique G!

 

Not mine. I'm still shopping & haven't found the right one yet...

 

One of the main reasons I bought SLICK was because she had a sunroof! My previous car was a '92 Nissan 300ZXTT with t-tops and would have bought another Z but they quit building them with any type of sunroof/t-top! When driving in the rain we can't roll down our windows but you can crack your sunroof to get fresh air and not get soaked.
Gary

 

Weight savings (60-70 lbs) and gained head room.

 

Ill sell you mine if you want it? I pulled it out. but mine is a race car... so... lol

it is only about 40lb though tracks and all.

 

Nice! Former '94 TT Z32 owner here also

Yeah, I'm kinda partial to the sunroof... Get claustrophobic with no holes in the roof, haha.

 

correct
Much more room to get head now

 

im pulling mine off as well. i think im going to add a cap weld a brace in and a non sunroof headliner.

i hate sunroofs.

 

Everyone has their preferences.. I prefer hard top because I feel the sunroof ruins the whole 'sports car' look and makes it look like more a altima/lexus with unnecessary luxury bells & whistles

Might also be preferred because its abit rare aswell, all G's I see have sunroofs.. so its meh.

I remember honda guys going crazy for civics with sunroof because 80% of them don't have them,
same logic here

 

If you wear a helmet on the track, it's a bit tight for the tall folks.

 

Yea my passengers do not have much head room when I had my sunroof in. Have more now.

 

search "sunroof flew off" threads lol

 

weight reduction bro

 

Thanks, meathead Rob Lowe!